【新唐人2014年08月05日讯】中共喉舌媒体近两天大篇幅详细起底“炫富女郭美美”卖淫、赌博、被包养等细节，并指称，她与“中国红十字会”毫无关系，令公众感到愕然。大陆民众斥责中共为了转移最近接连发生的大事件，和漂白“红十字会”，而毫无底线的拿一个女子的狗血剧进行炒作。
北京警方8月3号证实，郭美美等人7月14号，因涉嫌赌博罪，被北京市公安局刑事拘留，郭美美的“干爹”，深圳富商王军也在7月24号被北京警方刑拘。
近两天，中共喉舌媒体《新华网》、《人民网》、《央视》等，罕见的大篇幅起底郭美美，宣称郭美美与“干爹”王军实为“包养关系”，王军每次都给5万包养费，还给她240万买车，并宣称两人不是“红会”人员，有关“红会”事件是无中生有。
报导说，郭美美嗜赌成性，设赌局“抽水”，拉熟人下水；私生活极为混乱，“商演”背后多为性交易，每次价码达数10万元人民币等。
报导还说，郭美美1991年出生在湖南益阳一个单亲家庭，父亲有诈骗前科，母亲长期经营洗浴、桑拿、茶艺等休闲服务，大姨曾因涉嫌容留他人卖淫，被公安机关刑事拘留，舅舅曾因贩毒被判刑等。
喉舌媒体的这一举动，令公众大跌眼镜。福建网民吴淦指出，郭美美最多就是卖淫和赌博，党媒花这么大的力气去爆一个女孩的丑闻，只会让人反感。
福建网民吴淦：“郭美美你用这种手段比如说让她上电视，然后把审讯的内容公布，然后说她家里人怎么样怎么样，作为一个公权力这样做是很不耻的，这个是很下作的，所以我对整个事件，我是觉得非常反感的。”
北京宪政学者陈永苗指出，“红会”的问题是公权力腐败的问题，当局不去查处他们，不但把所有事情推到郭美美身上，还把她家人都搞臭，这样只会越描越黑。
北京宪政学者陈永苗：“它推出这个新闻稿我看了一下，比如说，郭美美一次卖淫弄了十几万，就是很明显的它有很多的破绽，然后相当于这个文稿出来，它不仅没有平息人家对红十字会的怀疑，它反而加大了对红十字会的怀疑。”
陈永苗表示，在这个时间点上放出郭美美事件，实际上就是想要掩盖最近一系列不稳定的大事件，平息民怨。
陈永苗：“(云南)地震、昆山爆炸事故，还有掩盖周永康被法办这个震荡的效应，因为郭美美一出来，然后立即把其他的事情掩盖住了，它就放出一个次要的，而且是比较狗血的东西，把一些比较尖锐的东西给盖住了。”
不过，大陆网民并不相信喉舌媒体的报导，网友质问“红十字会”的头现在是谁？干嘛为了洗白“红会”，绕这么大的圈子去整郭美美？让人感觉好像是在保护谁。
还有网友表示，爆炒郭美美事件是因为“红十字会”又要募捐了。
早在2011年6月，20岁的郭美美通过微博炫富，自称是“中国红十字会商业总经理”，引发了公众对“红十字会”持续多年的信任危机。
去年“4.21雅安地震”后，“红十字会”在“微博”呼吁捐款，却在不到两天的时间，收到了14多万个“滚”字留言。“红会”随后宣布，将重新调查郭美美事件。
郭美美则回应说，自己手中握有高层丑闻证据，资料已寄美国。随后，红会秘书长说：“红会没有任何人说要重查郭美美”。
一时间，郭美美究竟握有哪位大人物的把柄，成为网路议论的话题。
美国媒体《大纪元》报导，中共中央政治局常委刘云山父子涉“郭美美事件”。报导说：2004年，刘云山安插儿子刘乐飞进入“中国人寿保险公司”，出任投资管理部总经理，掌管超过5000亿元的保险资产。
2006年7月，刘乐飞出任首席投资执行官，大发慈善财，而在“郭美美事件”中被扯出的“博爱小站”，就是刘乐飞借慈善捞钱的项目。
采访编辑/李韵 后制/陈建铭
Chinese Condemn Media Exploiting Guo Meimei to Absolve Red Cross
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) mouthpiece media
showed Guo Meimei apologizing in long detail for her flashy
antics, including prostitution, gambling, and mistress life.
They also claimed that she has nothing to do
with China Red Cross.
Chinese mainlanders are condemning the CCP for
shamelessly making a show of and hyping up the lady’s story
to distract attention from a recent spate of big incidents
and clear the name of Red Cross.
On August 3, Beijing police confirmed Guo and others
have been under criminal detention at the Beijing Municipal Public
Security Bureau on suspicion of gambling since July 14.
On July 24, Guo’s “godfather,” Shenzhen businessman
Wang Jun was also detained in Beijing.
In the past two days, CCP mouthpiece Xinhua News Agency,
People’s Daily, China Central TV and so on
reported on Guo’s story at unusually great length.
They claimed Guo is the mistress of Wang Jun, who offered
Guo more than $8,000 each time and bought her a car
worth nearly $40,000.
The reports also claimed these two people aren’t connected to
the Red Cross, and the Red Cross incident was fabricated.
The reports say Guo is addicted to gambling, and made profits
by setting up gambling rings and pulling acquaintances into it.
The reports say her private life is very messy,
involving lots of prostitution behind closed doors,
with Guo making upwards of $16,000 each time.
The report also said 23-year-old Guo was born into a single-
parent family in Yiyang, Hunan province.
I claimed her dad has been convicted of fraud,
her mom is engaged in some leisure services including
a sauna and bathhouse, tea ceremonies and so on; her aunt
was once detained on suspicion of harboring prostitutes;
and her uncle was sentenced for drug trafficking.
The mouthpiece media’s actions were shocking to a lot people.
Fujian netizen Qu Gan says that, at most,
Guo is involved in prostitution and gambling.
Qu says it’s distasteful for the party media to spend so much
effort to reveal this scandal of one girl.
Wu Gan: “As a public authority, it’s very shameless to have
Guo’s face plastered on TV in such a way, publicizing her trial
and her family members’ histories.
I feel very disgusted by the whole thing.”
Beijing constitutional scholar Chen Yongmiao says that the
problem with China’s Red Cross is its corruption.
The authorities didn’t stop at putting all responsibility on Guo,
but also discredited her family members,
without any investigating of China’s Red Cross,
which will only blacken its name further.
Chen Yongmiao: “I read the news and found many obvious
flaws, such as Guo receiving several hundred thousand yuan
for each prostitution visit.
The reports didn’t ease people’s doubts on the Red Cross,
but instead increased suspicion of it."
Chen says the publishing of the incident with Guo at this point
is to cover up recent waves of big events and quell discontent.
Chen Yongmiao: “The impact of the Yunnan earthquake,
the car factory explosion in Kunshan and Zhou Yongkang case
are concealed by the Guo Meimei event.
They report this minor issue to cover up the pointed issues.”
However, the mainland netizens don’t trust the Party
mouthpiece reports.
Some netizens are questioning, who is Red Cross’s director?
Why must Red Cross’s name be cleared by persecuting Guo
in such a roundabout way?
It seems they are protecting someone.
Some netizens say the hype up of Guo Meimei is because the
Red Cross will collect donations again.
Back to June of 2011, then 20-year-old Guo showed off her
wealth online on social media and claimed herself as
the commercial general manager of China’s Red Cross.
It sparked public distrust of China’s Red Cross,
which has followed it for years.
Last year, China’s Red Cross called for donations on Weibo
microblog after an earthquake in Ya’an, Sichuan Province.
In less than two days, they received
more than 140 thousand posts saying “get lost."
China’s Red Cross then announced
it would re-investigate the events surrounding Guo.
Guo responded saying that she has evidence of scandals of
high-level officials, which she has sent to the United States.
Later, the secretary general of China’s Red Cross said:
“No one from the Red Cross said Guo Meimei would be reinvestigated."
For a while, guesses on which important person it was that
Guo had evidence on became a hot topic on China’s Internet.
U.S.-based Epoch Times reported that Politburo Standing
Committee member Liu Yunshan and his son are involved
in the events with Guo.
The report says that in 2004, Liu placed his son Liu Lefei into
China Life Insurance Company as the general manager
of the investment management department,
in charge of more than $80.9 billion worth of insurance assets.
In July of 2006, Liu Lefei made huge profits on charity money
as Chief Investment Officer.
The “fraternity station” implicated in the Guo Meimei event,
is Liu Lefei’s charity project to make money.
Interview & Edit/LiYin Post-Production/Chen Jianmin
