【新唐人2013年04月25日讯】四川雅安地震后，很多热心民众纷纷对灾区进行捐款、捐物救助。但很少有民众向“中国红十字会”捐款。而大陆民间慈善组织募集善款时，更以“与中国红会无关，请放心捐款!”为口号。惨遭滑铁卢的“中国红十字会”最近宣称，将重新针对“郭美美事件”进行调查。
四川雅安地震之后，“中国红十字会”开始发起募捐活动，但深陷各种贪腐丑闻的“中国红会”，显然无法得到民众的信任。网络消息显示，截至4月20号晚间7点，“中国红十字基金会”总共才收到捐款14万元，它的官方微博更收到多达几百页的“滚”字留言。
24号，大陆媒体报导，“中国红会”在雅安地震募捐上遭遇滑铁卢之后，社会监督委员会对外宣称，将于5月中下旬，重新启动对“郭美美事件”的调查。
2011年，实名认证为“中国红十字会商业总经理”的郭美美在微博炫富，自称她“住大别墅，开玛莎拉蒂”。
香港作家、自由撰稿人张成觉：“郭美美那个事情已经过去了，你现在再怎么说，根本也挽回不了。它当然希望中国红十字会名声能挽回一点，但这都是徒劳的。”
雅安地震后，各民间募捐机构纷纷撇清与“中国红会”的关系，甚至在募捐现场贴出告示说：“郑重声明，本次活动与‘中国红十字会’没有任何关系，请大家放心捐赠! ”
时事评论员蓝述：“它实际上在很大程度上代表‘中国特色’这四个字，目前在中国民众的心里彻底破产。这么多年以来，所谓的‘中国特色’实质上是‘中共特色’。”
据了解，“中国红十字会”长期由中共卫生部代管，内设中共党委。 《德国之声》文章“中国红十字会与谁有关？”，其中引用网民的话指出，“中国红十字会”不过是中共整个权力系统的一部分。
国际红十字委员会（International Committee of the Red Cross，简称ICRC）东亚代表处官员马文德(Martin Unternaehrer)向美国《纽约时报》中文网表示：国际“红十字会”与各国“红十字会”并不存在任何隶属关系。国际“红十字会”无权要求“中国红会”公开账目，也无权监督“中国红会”的具体运作。
蓝述：“红十字会在国外救死扶伤。到了中国去，加上个中国特色，它就变成了一个为维护中共形象而做事情的腐败机构。”
近年来，大陆当局对民众的暴力“维稳”和全面贪腐，导致中共民心尽失、危机重重。作为中共附属机构的“中国红十字会”，自然也爆发了信用危机。
2008年四川汶川大地震后，“中国红十字会”收到各界捐款超过40亿元。但随即而来的各种贪污、挪用丑闻，让民众深感被骗、上当。2011年，先是“上海市卢湾区红十字会”的一张近万元的餐饮发票被曝光，不久，又爆发了“郭美美事件”，再次让“中国红会”信誉扫地。
时事评论员汪北稷曾亲自参加过2008年汶川大地震救灾，在灾区他亲自看到用铁丝替代钢筋的房子，而很多学生被这样的校舍砸死。
汪北稷表示，这样悲痛的事情，和当局的麻木、对热心人士的打压，都让人深感“人祸”害人。而民众通过郭美美等事件，彻底抛弃了“中国红十字会”。
时事评论员汪北稷：“这是中国人民对中共腐败专制政权觉醒的一个标志。中国人民要从天灾当中看到人祸，人祸就是中共，中共就是中国最大的人祸。”
汪北稷强调，从唐山大地震、汶川大地震到当前的雅安地震，一次次天灾之后，人们都震惊目睹中共腐败政权的“反人类”行径。汪北稷认为，这将加速中共政权的解体。
采访/易如 编辑/李谦 后制/萧宇
China’s Red Cross Wants to Earn Its Reputation Back
Lots of warmhearted people have made donations of
money and materials for the Ya’an earthquake victims.
However, few people have sent their donations
via the Red Cross Society of China (RCSC).
China’s non-official charity groups have explicitly
distanced themselves from the RCSC in respect of donations.
the RCSC Supervisory Board declared it will reopen the
investigation into “the Guo Meimei incident”.
After a 7-magnitude earthquake hit Ya’an,
the RCSC initiated a donation campaign.
The RCSC has obviously lost people’s trust for it’s
being rocked by corruption scandals.
By 7pm on April 20, the RCSC has only received
donations of 140,000 yuan.
On its official micro-blog were left hundreds of pages of
Comments saying: “Scram!”
On April 24, China’s media reported
an announcement by the RCSC Supervisory Board.
The organ intends to reopen an investigation into
the “Guo Meimei incident” in mid-to-end of May.
In 2011, Guo Meimei showed off her wealth
in her real-name micro-blog account,
under the title of “Commercial General Manager, the RCSC”.
Guo claimed that she
“lives in a big villa and owns a Maserati.”
(Hong Kong writer) Cheung Shing Kok: “The scandal of
Guo Meimei has been exposed to the public.
No matter how hard you try to earn back
the reputation of the RCSC, it will be futile.”
All of China’s non-official charities have all openly claimed
that they have no relation with the RCSC.
A notice was posted on the site of a donation campaign.
It reads, “We hereby declare that this event
has nothing to do with the Red Cross Society of China.
Please rest assured of this when you make your donations! “
(Critic) Lan Shu: “This issue has largely destroyed
Chinese civilians’ recognition of ‘Chinese characteristics’.
Over decades, the so-called ‘Chinese characteristics’
have always been ‘ Communist Party characteristics’.”
Public data show that the RCSC has been
under administration of the CCP Ministry of Health.
The RCSC has set up a CCP committee.
A commentary published in Deutsche Welle
Chinese website cited netizens in China.
It said, “the RCSC is actually an integral part of
the whole CCP system of rule.”
Martin Unternaehrer, official at the Regional Delegation
for East Asia, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) told the New York Times Chinese website that
the ICRC is independent of the Red Cross agencies
of all other member nations.
The ICRC has no right to require the RCSC to
make its financial accounts public.
Nor does it have rights to oversee
the operation of the RCSC.
Lan Shu: “Overseas, the Red Cross is deemed to save lives.
But in China, it is pre-fixed with ‘Chinese characteristics’.
That has turned it into a corrupt agency,
which exists to maintain the established image of the CCP. ”
In recent years, the CCP authorities’ violent
“stability preservation” and all-out corruption have totally lost the people’s trust.
The RCSC certainly cannot escape the public distrust
resulting from this
For the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake,
the RCSC received donations of over 4 billion yuan.
However, what ensued were continuous scandals of
corruption and embezzlements.
In 2011, the RCSC Shanghai Luwan branch was exposed
as having laid on a meal costing nearly 10,000 yuan.
Later, “the Guo Meimei incident” was unveiled.
And the scandals have discredited the RCSC.
Commentator Wang Beiji was among those in the rescue
efforts for the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake victims.
In the quake-hit areas, he witnessed jerry-built houses,
with steel reinforcements replaced with iron wire.
Many student victims were crushed by collapsing
school buildings of dangerously inferior quality.
Wang Beiji says that, facing such tragedies, the authorities
Have always shown scorn and have cracked down on warmhearted activists.
These facts have made the public realize that
the disaster was in fact man-made.
The exposure of “the Guo Meimei incident” has led
the public to distrust the RCSC.
Wang Beiji: “This signals an awakening of the Chinese people
to the ugly reality of the CCP’s corrupt authoritarian regime.
The Chinese should now realise that man-made disaster
has been the real source of all the ” natural catastrophes” .
The worst man-made disaster in China is exactly
the existence of the CCP itself.”
Wang Beiji points out that after so many earthquakes
and other disasters have occurred in China,
citizens have repeatedly witnessed and have
been shocked by the CCP’s crimes against humanity.
Wang Beiji says this will speed up
the disintegration of the Communist regime.
