【新唐人2013年04月25日訊】四川雅安地震後，很多熱心民眾紛紛對災區進行捐款、捐物救助。但很少有民眾向「中國紅十字會」捐款。而大陸民間慈善組織募集善款時，更以「與中國紅會無關，請放心捐款!」為口號。慘遭滑鐵盧的「中國紅十字會」最近宣稱，將重新針對「郭美美事件」進行調查。
四川雅安地震之後，「中國紅十字會」開始發起募捐活動，但深陷各種貪腐醜聞的「中國紅會」，顯然無法得到民眾的信任。網絡消息顯示，截至4月20號晚間7點，「中國紅十字基金會」總共才收到捐款14萬元，它的官方微博更收到多達幾百頁的「滾」字留言。
24號，大陸媒體報導，「中國紅會」在雅安地震募捐上遭遇滑鐵盧之後，社會監督委員會對外宣稱，將於5月中下旬，重新啟動對「郭美美事件」的調查。
2011年，實名認證為「中國紅十字會商業總經理」的郭美美在微博炫富，自稱她「住大別墅，開瑪莎拉蒂」。
香港作家、自由撰稿人張成覺：「郭美美那個事情已經過去了，你現在再怎麼說，根本也挽回不了。它當然希望中國紅十字會名聲能挽回一點，但這都是徒勞的。」
雅安地震後，各民間募捐機構紛紛撇清與「中國紅會」的關係，甚至在募捐現場貼出告示說：「鄭重聲明，本次活動與『中國紅十字會』沒有任何關係，請大家放心捐贈! 」
時事評論員藍述：「它實際上在很大程度上代表『中國特色』這四個字，目前在中國民眾的心裡徹底破產。這麼多年以來，所謂的『中國特色』實質上是『中共特色』。」
據了解，「中國紅十字會」長期由中共衛生部代管，內設中共黨委。 《德國之聲》文章「中國紅十字會與誰有關？」，其中引用網民的話指出，「中國紅十字會」不過是中共整個權力系統的一部分。
國際紅十字委員會（International Committee of the Red Cross，簡稱ICRC）東亞代表處官員馬文德(Martin Unternaehrer)向美國《紐約時報》中文網表示：國際「紅十字會」與各國「紅十字會」並不存在任何隸屬關係。國際「紅十字會」無權要求「中國紅會」公開賬目，也無權監督「中國紅會」的具體運作。
藍述：「紅十字會在國外救死扶傷。到了中國去，加上個中國特色，它就變成了一個為維護中共形象而做事情的腐敗機構。」
近年來，大陸當局對民眾的暴力「維穩」和全面貪腐，導致中共民心盡失、危機重重。作為中共附屬機構的「中國紅十字會」，自然也爆發了信用危機。
2008年四川汶川大地震後，「中國紅十字會」收到各界捐款超過40億元。但隨即而來的各種貪污、挪用醜聞，讓民眾深感被騙、上當。2011年，先是「上海市盧灣區紅十字會」的一張近萬元的餐飲發票被曝光，不久，又爆發了「郭美美事件」，再次讓「中國紅會」信譽掃地。
時事評論員汪北稷曾親自參加過2008年汶川大地震救災，在災區他親自看到用鐵絲替代鋼筋的房子，而很多學生被這樣的校舍砸死。
汪北稷表示，這樣悲痛的事情，和當局的麻木、對熱心人士的打壓，都讓人深感「人禍」害人。而民眾通過郭美美等事件，徹底拋棄了「中國紅十字會」。
時事評論員汪北稷：「這是中國人民對中共腐敗專制政權覺醒的一個標誌。中國人民要從天災當中看到人禍，人禍就是中共，中共就是中國最大的人禍。」
汪北稷強調，從唐山大地震、汶川大地震到當前的雅安地震，一次次天災之後，人們都震驚目睹中共腐敗政權的「反人類」行徑。汪北稷認為，這將加速中共政權的解體。
採訪/易如 編輯/李謙 後製/蕭宇
China’s Red Cross Wants to Earn Its Reputation Back
Lots of warmhearted people have made donations of
money and materials for the Ya’an earthquake victims.
However, few people have sent their donations
via the Red Cross Society of China (RCSC).
China’s non-official charity groups have explicitly
distanced themselves from the RCSC in respect of donations.
the RCSC Supervisory Board declared it will reopen the
investigation into “the Guo Meimei incident”.
After a 7-magnitude earthquake hit Ya’an,
the RCSC initiated a donation campaign.
The RCSC has obviously lost people’s trust for it’s
being rocked by corruption scandals.
By 7pm on April 20, the RCSC has only received
donations of 140,000 yuan.
On its official micro-blog were left hundreds of pages of
Comments saying: “Scram!”
On April 24, China’s media reported
an announcement by the RCSC Supervisory Board.
The organ intends to reopen an investigation into
the “Guo Meimei incident” in mid-to-end of May.
In 2011, Guo Meimei showed off her wealth
in her real-name micro-blog account,
under the title of “Commercial General Manager, the RCSC”.
Guo claimed that she
“lives in a big villa and owns a Maserati.”
(Hong Kong writer) Cheung Shing Kok: “The scandal of
Guo Meimei has been exposed to the public.
No matter how hard you try to earn back
the reputation of the RCSC, it will be futile.”
All of China’s non-official charities have all openly claimed
that they have no relation with the RCSC.
A notice was posted on the site of a donation campaign.
It reads, “We hereby declare that this event
has nothing to do with the Red Cross Society of China.
Please rest assured of this when you make your donations! “
(Critic) Lan Shu: “This issue has largely destroyed
Chinese civilians’ recognition of ‘Chinese characteristics’.
Over decades, the so-called ‘Chinese characteristics’
have always been ‘ Communist Party characteristics’.”
Public data show that the RCSC has been
under administration of the CCP Ministry of Health.
The RCSC has set up a CCP committee.
A commentary published in Deutsche Welle
Chinese website cited netizens in China.
It said, “the RCSC is actually an integral part of
the whole CCP system of rule.”
Martin Unternaehrer, official at the Regional Delegation
for East Asia, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) told the New York Times Chinese website that
the ICRC is independent of the Red Cross agencies
of all other member nations.
The ICRC has no right to require the RCSC to
make its financial accounts public.
Nor does it have rights to oversee
the operation of the RCSC.
Lan Shu: “Overseas, the Red Cross is deemed to save lives.
But in China, it is pre-fixed with ‘Chinese characteristics’.
That has turned it into a corrupt agency,
which exists to maintain the established image of the CCP. ”
In recent years, the CCP authorities’ violent
“stability preservation” and all-out corruption have totally lost the people’s trust.
The RCSC certainly cannot escape the public distrust
resulting from this
For the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake,
the RCSC received donations of over 4 billion yuan.
However, what ensued were continuous scandals of
corruption and embezzlements.
In 2011, the RCSC Shanghai Luwan branch was exposed
as having laid on a meal costing nearly 10,000 yuan.
Later, “the Guo Meimei incident” was unveiled.
And the scandals have discredited the RCSC.
Commentator Wang Beiji was among those in the rescue
efforts for the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake victims.
In the quake-hit areas, he witnessed jerry-built houses,
with steel reinforcements replaced with iron wire.
Many student victims were crushed by collapsing
school buildings of dangerously inferior quality.
Wang Beiji says that, facing such tragedies, the authorities
Have always shown scorn and have cracked down on warmhearted activists.
These facts have made the public realize that
the disaster was in fact man-made.
The exposure of “the Guo Meimei incident” has led
the public to distrust the RCSC.
Wang Beiji: “This signals an awakening of the Chinese people
to the ugly reality of the CCP’s corrupt authoritarian regime.
The Chinese should now realise that man-made disaster
has been the real source of all the ” natural catastrophes” .
The worst man-made disaster in China is exactly
the existence of the CCP itself.”
Wang Beiji points out that after so many earthquakes
and other disasters have occurred in China,
citizens have repeatedly witnessed and have
been shocked by the CCP’s crimes against humanity.
Wang Beiji says this will speed up
the disintegration of the Communist regime.
