【新唐人2013年04月16日讯】4月15号是中共前总书记胡耀邦逝世24周年。大陆多家官方媒体发表纪念胡耀邦的文章，以及刊登当年“天安门广场”学生聚集纪念胡耀邦的照片。但是胡耀邦家的胡同被警察封锁，希望拜访祭奠的人们被拦截和驱逐。中南海前秘书俞梅荪回忆胡耀邦曾说，“要防止法律走向反动”，似乎印证了今天的现实。
中共上海市委机关报《解放日报》，4月15号发表两篇文章，纪念胡耀邦逝世24周年。
上海媒体界元老周瑞金，曾任《解放日报》党委书记、和《人民日报》副总编辑，他在纪念胡耀邦的文章中说：“在中国改革到了需要狠推一步、击一猛掌的新的历史时刻，缅怀耀邦，有很强烈的现实意义。”
此外，《中国新闻周刊》也刊登了题为《胡耀邦治丧与学生游行》的回忆文章。其中披露了在胡耀邦去世之后，媒体对于报导规格不知所措的内幕，以及学生运动风雨欲来的历史画面。文章说，“这天上午，从人民大会堂向天安门广场望去，学生坐满了广场，四周人来人往，他们举着青年斗士，民主领袖、浴血民主等横幅….预示着一场大的风暴不可避免了！”
据中南海前秘书俞梅荪表示，他15号前往位于会计师胡同的胡耀邦家祭奠，看到在距离两百米远的地方建了一个大铁门，并被警察封锁，有二、三十个举着鲜花的访民被拦在外面。俞梅荪也被拦住不让进。
中南海前秘书俞梅荪：“ 大约有二、三十个，访民们都拿着鲜花，访民们都很穷的。每人掏五块钱，凑了150块钱，买了几把鲜花，都在那里。”
俞梅荪说，警察不断的拍摄、录像。来了四五辆警车，还来了一个大客车。访民告诉他说，那个大客车是专门拉人的。俞梅荪让访民帮他拍照留念，遭到警察驱赶。俞梅荪离开之后，听到留守的朋友说，后来访民们都被大客车拉走了。
胡耀邦的长子，全国政协常委胡德平，在胡耀邦忌日当天，婉拒了《新唐人》的采访，但感谢众人纪念先父的心意。
胡耀邦长子胡德平：“这个咱们先不说了。好不好？什么时候可以一起见见面，说点很轻松的事。好吗？因为今天也来了很多人。我们也知道来人的心情。也感谢大家。”
俞梅荪曾经在国务院担任立法工作十年，他曾向胡耀邦汇报立法工作，当时胡耀邦告诉他：立法无需太多。重要的是要让老百姓记住。
俞梅荪：“1985年的时候，我负责执笔我们国家七五立法规划，这个报到耀邦那里去。耀邦说，你这个立法要立那么多法，三个多个法，一个法要三四千字，三百个法要120万字，老百姓记都记不过来。这怎么得了。”
在此之前，胡耀邦也曾经批示说，要防止法律走向“反动”。
俞梅荪：“1982年的时候，耀邦对我们的六五立法规划也有一个批示。就是法律不能太多，要防止法走向反面。要防止法走向反动。不要把法搞成反动的东西。我一直对耀邦不以为然。我认为耀邦是个外行。”
但是九年后，当俞梅荪受到《文汇报》的陷害入狱之后，警察拒绝给他看任何法律书籍。他突然明白胡耀邦对立法的理解。
俞梅荪：“我从警察那里提审回来，回到牢房，当监狱的牢门铁门砰的一声在我的后面关上，一声巨响，忽然之间我觉得，耀邦是对的，我是错的。法连我这个立法工作者都掌握不了，更何况老百姓啊？”
1989年，胡耀邦逝世后，民众自发的悼念活动，拉开学生民主运动帷幕，并引发1989年天安门事件。近年来，要求中共“平反天安门事件”的呼声越来越高，有分析人士认为，官媒的纪念文章，赞扬胡耀邦在文革后为数百万人平反的功绩，这是暗示当局应该“平反六四”。
采访编辑/秦雪 后制/李月
Chinese Official Media Memorize Hu Yaobang,
Visitors Were Dismissed
April 15 is the 24th anniversary of the death of former Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) General Secretary Hu Yaobang.
Many Chinese official media published articles to
commemorate Hu Yaobang.
They included photos of students gathered on Tiananmen
Square to commemorate Hu Yaobang when he passed away.
However, the alley of Hu Yaobang’s home was blocked.
People who went to pay a visit were intercepted and expelled.
Zhongnanhai former secretary Yu Meisun recalled Hu Yaobang
once said “to prevent the law toward reactionary."
It seems to be today’s reality.
CCP Shanghai Municipal official newspaper Liberation Daily
published two articles on April 15th commemorating the 24th
anniversary of the death of Hu Yaobang.
Shanghai media veteran Zhou Ruijin, former Liberation Daily
party secretary and People’s Daily deputy editor-in-chief,
wrote an article to commemorate Hu Yaobang:
“China’s reform is at a new stage that needs relentless push
and heavy punch.
To commemorate Hu Yaobang has
a very strong practical significance."
In addition, China Newsweek also published an article titled
Hu Yaobang’s Funeral And Students Demonstration.
It disclosed that the media did not know how to cover
the death of Hu, as well as the history of the student movement.
The article says, “In the morning, looking at Tiananmen Square
from the Great Hall, students filled the square.
They held up banners stating: “Young Fighters,” “Democratic
Leaders,” “Blood for Democracy” etc. A big storm is inevitable!”
According to former Zhongnanhai secretary Yu Meisun,
on April 15th, he went to Hu Yaobang’s home at Kuiji Alley.
He saw a big iron gate set up about 200 meters from the place.
It was blocked by the police.
About 20 to 30 petitioners holding flowers were stopped
outside the gate. Yu Mei-Sun was also and not allowed to enter.
Yu Meisun: “There were about 20 to 30 petitioners,
holding flowers.
Petitioners are very poor, but they gathered 150 yuan as
each of them contributed 5 yuan, to get some flowers.”
Yu Meisun said the police kept taking pictures and
shooting videos of them.
Several police cars and a bus came. Petitioners told him
the bus was to take people away.
Yu Meisun asked the petitioners to take a picture of him.
They were expelled by the police.
After Yu Meisun left, some friends who stayed behind said
petitioners were taken away by the bus.
Hu Yaobao’s eldest son, member of the Standing Committee
of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference,
declined NTDTV’s interview. He thanked them for the
intention of a memorial for his father.
Hu Deping: “Let’s not talk about it now. We can meet up
later and chat about something more relaxed.
Many people came today. We know how they feel.
We are also grateful to everyone.”
Yu Meisun once worked at the State Department doing
legislative work for ten years, and reported to Hu Yaobang.
Hu Yaobang told him that Legislative work does not need
to be too much. It is important to let people remember.
Yu Meisun: “In 1985, I was responsible for drafting the
legislative plan for the 7th Five Year Planning.
It was sent to HuYaobang. He said, you wrote so many articles.
One article is about 3,000 to 4,000 words.
Over 300 articles will be 1.2 million words.
How can people remember them?”
Before then, Hu Yaobang also commented on
preventing the law from being anti-revolutionary.
Yu Meisun: “In 1982, Hu Yaobang also provided his input
to the legislative plan for the 6th Five Year Planning.
He said there should not too many legal articles. We should
prevent the law to be against revolution.
I did not take it seriously. I thought he did not understand law.”
Nine years later, Yu Meisun was slandered by Wen Wei Po
and was sent to prison.
When the police refused to show him any legal books,
he suddenly realized Hu Yaobang’s understanding of the law.
Yu Meisun: “After the interrogation, I come back from the
police station. The iron prison cell door slammed behind me.
Suddenly, I felt Yaobang was right, I was wrong.
I as a legislative professional cannot understand the law,
let alone the people.”
In 1989, people commemorated Hu Yaobang voluntarily
after he passed away.
It was the beginning of the student democratic movement,
which led to the Tiananmen Square Incident.
In recent years, the calling to return innocence to the
Tiananmen Square Incident has got louder and louder.
Analysts believe official media’s article praising Hu Yaobang’s
achievements to return innocence to millions of people after
the Cultural Revolution implies that the authorities should
“return innocence to the “June 4th Movement."
reporter
