【新唐人2013年04月16日讯】日前，“上访妈妈”唐慧，诉请“永州市劳教委赔偿案”被一审驳回﹔而，“浙江杭州强奸冤案”的当事人张高平，也是坐了10年的冤狱，他的赔偿目前似乎也没有了下文。中共喉舌《人民日报》最近针对唐慧、及张高平案提出批评。这是中共中央与地方当局的意见不一吗? 一起去看详细报导。
针对唐慧及张高平案，《人民日报》批评指出，每一个判例，都是公众法治信仰的基石﹔而每一次失误，都可能导致信仰的崩塌。具体到唐慧案，除了关注“劳教决定是否合法，撤销决定是否意味着必须赔偿”的争议，公众同样希望看到湖南省政法委兑现去年8月作出的承诺，彻查唐慧女儿被逼卖淫案，及时公布调查结果，在这起始终伴随争执和猜疑的案件上给社会一个清楚明白的答案。
《人民日报》还说，“没有信心，就没有信仰。让公民信仰法律，法律须给公民以信心。这就需要执法者公正对待公民的合法诉求。”
4月12号，唐慧诉求永州市劳教委赔偿的案子，被一审驳回，唐慧走出法庭之后，掩面痛哭，她说还要上诉。
而张高平在宣判无罪的法庭上，对法官说：“你们今天是法官和检察官，但你们的子孙不一定是。如果没有法律和制度的保障的话，你们的子孙也可以被冤枉，也可能徘徊在死刑的边缘。”
《人民日报》这篇标题为：《尽心呵护公众对法治的信仰》文章，希望地方当局要通过“对一起起司法个案”的公正处置，把法治精神、法治意识、法治观念深深熔铸于公众的心中。文章最后还特别提到所谓，“党的十八大重申全面推进依法治国的目标”。
原《河北人民广播电台》编辑朱欣欣﹕“只能说明中共对媒体的控制，或对各地的控制，不是完全能够控制得住的、能够统一起来的。地方有地方的利益，中央有中央的考虑，他们双方还是有矛盾的。还有一种情况呢，就是中央他们内部也是有不同的派别在进行博弈，一派可能控制不同的系统，他们各自也产生矛盾。”
据报导，张高平被屈打成招，警方还准备了认罪书，逼迫张高平抄写，而认罪过程，完全由杭州市公安局刑侦支队预审大队大队长聂海芬一手主导，她还自夸透过“突审”方式，取得“无懈可击”的铁证，才将张高平叔侄二人定罪入狱。
聂海芬在4月2号的微博出现，声称“我不是恶警察，不能坐牢，坐牢的应当是公安局长、检察院长、人民法院院长！”，她还表示，“你们知道政府有个政法委、法院有个审委会…每个案件，你们知道是谁定的调子吗？”、“你们敢向政法委叫板吗？”
朱欣欣﹕“过去的既得利益者他不愿意出让自己的权利，他就要拚命的来保护自己的权利，同时，他要捂盖子，要掩盖自己过去的一些过错，对立的一方就要通过揭露他的一些丑闻、一些问题、一些罪行来从社会舆论方面，从各个方面来打击对方。”
北京宪政学者陈永苗表示，从90年代中央和地方财政实施分税制度之后，地方的财政通过土地财政，不再依赖中央政府，因此，地方开始不听中央的话，政令不出中南海。
陈永苗﹕“所以胡锦涛、温家宝他们就想出一个办法，利用网络媒体或者中央媒体来搞地方政府，然后造成事情大了，他就从政治上把他们官位撤掉。”
陈永苗认为，虽然中共内部矛盾激烈，但对外面的人来说，都是一体的，没有矛盾。因此，政法委撤销不撤销﹖地位上升不上升﹖对外部的人来说却没什么影响。
采访/刘惠 编辑/周平 后制/陈建铭
Hidden Agenda Behind People’s Daily Comment Up On Law Enforcement
Recently, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) mouthpiece,
People’s Daily, commented on court rulings of two cases.
They are: Tang Hui’s case, “Requesting compensation from a
Labor Camp in Yongzhou City”, being rejected at first instance;
Zhan Gaoping’s wrongfully detained for 10 years,
the compensation was never realized.
Did this commentary signal the difference between
local & Central authority ?
Referring to the cases of Tang Hui and Zhang Gaoping,
People’s Daily commented.
It said that each jurisprudence should build public faith in law,
with any mistake possibly leading to a collapse in that faith.
It questioned if the labor camp decision was legal and if
compensation should occur when the decision was withdrawn about Tang Hui’s case.
It also urged Hunan Provincial Politics and Law Committee to
honor the commitments made last August.
They are to investigate into the forced prostitution case
involving Tang Hui’s daughter.
And announcing the findings in a timely manner, resolving
the social disputes and mistrust associated with the case.
People’s Daily stated, “No confidence, no faith.
The law must provide the confidence to the citizens so they
have faith in that law.
It demands law enforcement according to the citizens
legitimate quest."
April 12, Tang Hui’s case, demanding compensation from
Yongzhou City Detention Committee, was rejected in the first instance.
Tang Hui broke down outside the court room saying,
“I will make an appeal!”
Zhang Gaoping said to the judge after being recognized
as innocent, “You are the judges and prosecutors, but your children might not be.
Without a legal and institutional protection, your children
may also be wronged, hovering at the edge of the death penalty."
People’s Daily article entitled, “Dedicated care to public
belief in law", asking the local authorities to treat each case
with fairness and to bring the spirit of awareness of law
to the people.
At the end It promoted, “March towards the goal of governing
by laws according to the Party’s 18th National Congress.”
Former Hebei People’s Radio Editor Zhu Xinxin: “It shows
that the CCP’s media control has not reached a consensus.
There are conflicts between the local and the central bodies.
Also, even within the central, conflicts exist in
different factions and systems."
It was reported, Zhang Gaoping experienced
forced confessions.
The police had a prepared confession and forced Zhang to
write accordingly.
The entire process was single-handedly led by Nie Haifen,
the Hangzhou Public Security Bureau Criminal Investigation Detachment pre-battalion.
She boasted how she had employed a “surprising” method to
obtain the iron evidence which convicted Zhang and his imprisonment.
Nie Haifen wrote a microblog on April 2 claiming,
“I am not a bad cop and can not be sent to jail.
The people who are supposed to go to jail are the directors
of the Public Security Bureau, the Procuratorate, and the People’s Court."
She continued, “You know the Politics and Law Committee,
the judicial committee in the Court …
Do you know who sets the tone for each case?
Do you dare to challenge the Politics and Law Committee?"
Zhu Xinxin: “People with vested interests will not let
go of the benefit.
They will desperately defend themselves.
While covering up their own mistakes, they expose their own
crimes by setting up public opinions to attack their opponents."
Beijing constitutional scholar Chen Yongmiao said, since
separation of the tax system between central and local authorities in the 1990s,
local governments have relied on land finance, rather than
the central government.
The local authority no longer complies entirely
with Zhongnanhai’s ruling.
Constitutional scholar Chen Yongmiao: “Hu Jintao and
Wen Jiabao have therefore utilized the Internet
and the media to control local government by revoking
their official positions, once the opinions are made."
Chen Yongmiao indicated that despite the intense conflicts
within the Communist Party, they are still one tyranny.
Thus, whether or not the Politics and Law Committee will
be revoked makes no difference to outsiders.
