【新唐人2012年6月19日讯】中共总理温家宝6月15号，参加了国务院参事和“中央文史研究馆”馆员的座谈会。他在会上发表讲话，强调领导者不能简单的将不同意见视为噪音充耳不闻。他呼吁“领导者应有听取和包容不同意见的雅量，不要轻易把不同意见说成噪音、杂音”。分析人士认为，温家宝是在暗批《人民日报》的“杂音噪音论”。
大陆的媒体报导，温家宝在中南海的座谈会上强调，要讲真话、听真话，善于从各种声音中汲取智慧。他说，领导者应有听取和包容不同意见的雅量，不要轻易把不同意见说成噪音、杂音，而应善于从不同声音特别是批评性意见中汲取智慧。
而在此之前，3月31号，《人民日报》提出“不为杂音噪音所扰”的文章。后来几天，《人民日报》借所谓“干部群众热议”，大肆炒作有关“杂音噪音”的说法。之后，出现了呼吁压制“杂音噪音”以实现所谓“统一思想”的宣传。
分析认为，温家宝日前的谈话是在暗批《人民日报》的“杂音噪音论”。
时事评论员任百鸣：“现在的情况就是说‘非红即黑’、‘非敌就是友’，比如说讲讲腐败，就是整个国家就不行，或者是批评一下国家了，就是抹黑中国，所以现在胡温就面临着比较复杂的局面，那么他们现在就是要凝聚共识，就是在舆论上面也放出一种…希望言论不要过激，大家可以发表各自的看法，不要互相戴帽子。”
然而，中共喉舌《新华社》对同一新闻的报导，回避了温家宝这句话。有分析指出，估计温家宝这句话是被相当高级别的“审查官”当做“噪音、杂音”删除了，而这就是充满黑色幽默的“政不出中南海”现象。
温家宝还指出，要发挥网络新媒体在了解民情、汇聚民智中的积极作用。
纽约“曼哈顿维尔学院”教授 杨锦霞：“这个世界上，现在网路已经是一个不可取代的一个很重要的媒体，以前是电视、收音机、广播，现在是网路。所以就算中共里面的统治者他们觉得，还是要控制他们，但世界潮流是推着它来走，尽管它是要这样做，但是世界潮流绝对不允许它这样做。”
温家宝说：如果民主法治不健全，权力得不到有效制约，有的人就会利用手中的权力侵犯甚至践踏法律。
时事评论员任百鸣：“温家宝他不断的在进行政改的言论，实际上在前段时间也是受到血债帮还有一些左派势力的强烈攻击，也是给温家宝戴了很多的这个帽子，所以我想取中啊，平衡啊，这些言论可能也是为温家宝的改革言论，给他一定的空间，稍为缓和一下目前火药味很浓的局面。”
有海外评论人士表示，温家宝宣导学术自由与独立思考的精神，是为了他的政改寻找突破口。但真正的独立思考，首先就要摆脱共产党那种僵化、扭曲的思想樊篱，看穿共产党那些蛊惑人心、愚弄民众的谎言。
杨锦霞：“温家宝先生的言论也是无可厚非的，这时代一直在改变，至于他说真说假，我不觉得他只是说一说而已，这个需要一个步骤，这个需要一个推动，我当然是希望他讲的都是他心里面想讲的真话，然后希望中国民主会迈向更前的一步。”
媒体分析认为，中国如果要走政改之路，就要开放报禁，从而更有效的制衡政府。不过，即使温家宝有心开放报禁，但在中共一党独裁专政体制下，这些都只是空想。因此，只有抛弃中共，中国才能走向真正的民主之路。
采访/常春 编辑/周平 后制/柏妮
Wen Jiabao Criticizes Noise Argument
On June 15, the CCP premier Wen Jiabao attended a
symposium with counselors of the State Council and
researchers of the Central Research Institute of Culture and
History.
He gave a speech on the symposium and emphasized that
leaders should not ignore the objections and simply treat them as noises.
He called for that “leader should listen to and be inclusive of
different views, and do not simply treat different views as noises.”
Analysts believe that what Wen said can be seen as a critique
on the “noise argument” by People’s Daily.
Mainland media reported,
Wen Jiabao emphasized on the symposium that
leaders should tell the truth and listen to the
truth, and they should learn from different views.
Wen said that leaders should listen to and be inclusive of
different views, and not simply treat different views as noises.
Wen mentioned that leaders should learn from different views,
especially critical comments.
Before Wen’s speech, on March 31, People’s Daily published
an article named “Do not be disturbed by the noise”.
In the following days, People’s Daily hyped about the noise
argument and called for suppressing the noise to achieve “unity of thinking”.
Analysts believe, Wen’s speech can be seen as
a critique of the noise argument led by People’s Daily.
Commenter Ren Baiming: “There are only ‘red or black’ and
‘enemy or friend’ in the current situation in China.
For example, if you discuss the corruption issues,
it means you lose hope for the whole country,
or if you criticize the government,
it means you bring shame on China.
So Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao face a complicated situation,
they want to reach a consensus with no radical comments –
so that people can express different views and
stop attacking each other.”
However, the CCP mouthpiece “Xinhua News Agency”
avoided Wen’s words when reporting the news.
Analysts believe that Wen’s words were deleted by
high level review officers as” noises”.
This “decrees only stay in Zhongnanhai” phenomenon
is full of black humor.
Wen Jiabao also mentioned, the new media based on the
internet should play an active role in understanding people’s needs and bringing their wisdom together.
Yang Jinxia, a professor at Manhattanville College said: “In
this world, Internet has become a irreplaceable media,
just like the TV, radio and broadcast in the old days.
Even if the CCP leaders want to control the Internet,
the world trends will not permit them to do so.
In fact, world trends will push the Internet forward.”
Wen Jiabao said: if democracy and the rule of law are not
perfect, the power can not be effectively constrained, and
someone may use their power to abuse
and even trample on the law.
Commenter Ren Baiming: “Wen Jiabao and his constant
political reform speech were attacked heavily by the bloody hands group.
There are many critiques on Wen Jiabao. So the arguments on
balance can give Wen some space for his political reform speech,
and these arguments can also ease a situation
which has a strong smell of gunpowder.”
Some overseas commenter said, Wen Jiabao promoted the
spirit of academic freedom and independent thinking to seek a breakthrough for his political reform.
However, the first step for independent thinking
should be getting rid of the rigid and distorted CCP thinking.
People should see through the CCP lies.
Yang Jinxia: “Wen Jiabao’s speech is understandable,
and the world is constantly changing.
As for the credibility of his words,
I do not think that he just talked about it.
There should be a step for pushing political reform.
I really hope what he said is also what he thinks in mind
and that China will move toward democracy.”
Several media analyzed, if China will move forward
on the political reform road,
press restriction must stop in order to check on
the government effectively.
However, it is just fantasy to do so
within the CCP one-party dictatorship system.
Therefore, China will move forward on the road to real
democracy only by abandoning the CCP.
