【新唐人2012年6月19日訊】中共總理溫家寶6月15號，參加了國務院參事和「中央文史研究館」館員的座談會。他在會上發表講話，強調領導者不能簡單的將不同意見視為噪音充耳不聞。他呼籲「領導者應有聽取和包容不同意見的雅量，不要輕易把不同意見說成噪音、雜音」。分析人士認為，溫家寶是在暗批《人民日報》的「雜音噪音論」。
大陸的媒體報導，溫家寶在中南海的座談會上強調，要講真話、聽真話，善於從各種聲音中汲取智慧。他說，領導者應有聽取和包容不同意見的雅量，不要輕易把不同意見說成噪音、雜音，而應善於從不同聲音特別是批評性意見中汲取智慧。
而在此之前，3月31號，《人民日報》提出「不為雜音噪音所擾」的文章。後來幾天，《人民日報》借所謂「幹部群眾熱議」，大肆炒作有關「雜音噪音」的說法。之後，出現了呼籲壓制「雜音噪音」以實現所謂「統一思想」的宣傳。
分析認為，溫家寶日前的談話是在暗批《人民日報》的「雜音噪音論」。
時事評論員任百鳴：「現在的情況就是說『非紅即黑』、『非敵就是友』，比如說講講腐敗，就是整個國家就不行，或者是批評一下國家了，就是抹黑中國，所以現在胡溫就面臨著比較複雜的局面，那麼他們現在就是要凝聚共識，就是在輿論上面也放出一種…希望言論不要過激，大家可以發表各自的看法，不要互相戴帽子。」
然而，中共喉舌《新華社》對同一新聞的報導，迴避了溫家寶這句話。有分析指出，估計溫家寶這句話是被相當高級別的「審查官」當做「噪音、雜音」刪除了，而這就是充滿黑色幽默的「政不出中南海」現象。
溫家寶還指出，要發揮網絡新媒體在了解民情、匯聚民智中的積極作用。
紐約「曼哈頓維爾學院」教授 楊錦霞：「這個世界上，現在網路已經是一個不可取代的一個很重要的媒體，以前是電視、收音機、廣播，現在是網路。所以就算中共裡面的統治者他們覺得，還是要控制他們，但世界潮流是推著它來走，儘管它是要這樣做，但是世界潮流絕對不允許它這樣做。」
溫家寶說：如果民主法治不健全，權力得不到有效制約，有的人就會利用手中的權力侵犯甚至踐踏法律。
時事評論員任百鳴：「溫家寶他不斷的在進行政改的言論，實際上在前段時間也是受到血債幫還有一些左派勢力的強烈攻擊，也是給溫家寶戴了很多的這個帽子，所以我想取中啊，平衡啊，這些言論可能也是為溫家寶的改革言論，給他一定的空間，稍為緩和一下目前火藥味很濃的局面。」
有海外評論人士表示，溫家寶宣導學術自由與獨立思考的精神，是為了他的政改尋找突破口。但真正的獨立思考，首先就要擺脫共產黨那種殭化、扭曲的思想樊籬，看穿共產黨那些蠱惑人心、愚弄民眾的謊言。
楊錦霞：「溫家寶先生的言論也是無可厚非的，這時代一直在改變，至於他說真說假，我不覺得他只是說一說而已，這個需要一個步驟，這個需要一個推動，我當然是希望他講的都是他心裡面想講的真話，然後希望中國民主會邁向更前的一步。」
媒體分析認為，中國如果要走政改之路，就要開放報禁，從而更有效的制衡政府。不過，即使溫家寶有心開放報禁，但在中共一黨獨裁專政體制下，這些都只是空想。因此，只有拋棄中共，中國才能走向真正的民主之路。
採訪/常春 編輯/周平 後製/柏妮
Wen Jiabao Criticizes Noise Argument
On June 15, the CCP premier Wen Jiabao attended a
symposium with counselors of the State Council and
researchers of the Central Research Institute of Culture and
History.
He gave a speech on the symposium and emphasized that
leaders should not ignore the objections and simply treat them as noises.
He called for that “leader should listen to and be inclusive of
different views, and do not simply treat different views as noises.”
Analysts believe that what Wen said can be seen as a critique
on the “noise argument” by People’s Daily.
Mainland media reported,
Wen Jiabao emphasized on the symposium that
leaders should tell the truth and listen to the
truth, and they should learn from different views.
Wen said that leaders should listen to and be inclusive of
different views, and not simply treat different views as noises.
Wen mentioned that leaders should learn from different views,
especially critical comments.
Before Wen’s speech, on March 31, People’s Daily published
an article named “Do not be disturbed by the noise”.
In the following days, People’s Daily hyped about the noise
argument and called for suppressing the noise to achieve “unity of thinking”.
Analysts believe, Wen’s speech can be seen as
a critique of the noise argument led by People’s Daily.
Commenter Ren Baiming: “There are only 『red or black’ and
『enemy or friend’ in the current situation in China.
For example, if you discuss the corruption issues,
it means you lose hope for the whole country,
or if you criticize the government,
it means you bring shame on China.
So Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao face a complicated situation,
they want to reach a consensus with no radical comments –
so that people can express different views and
stop attacking each other.”
However, the CCP mouthpiece “Xinhua News Agency”
avoided Wen’s words when reporting the news.
Analysts believe that Wen’s words were deleted by
high level review officers as” noises”.
This “decrees only stay in Zhongnanhai” phenomenon
is full of black humor.
Wen Jiabao also mentioned, the new media based on the
internet should play an active role in understanding people’s needs and bringing their wisdom together.
Yang Jinxia, a professor at Manhattanville College said: “In
this world, Internet has become a irreplaceable media,
just like the TV, radio and broadcast in the old days.
Even if the CCP leaders want to control the Internet,
the world trends will not permit them to do so.
In fact, world trends will push the Internet forward.”
Wen Jiabao said: if democracy and the rule of law are not
perfect, the power can not be effectively constrained, and
someone may use their power to abuse
and even trample on the law.
Commenter Ren Baiming: “Wen Jiabao and his constant
political reform speech were attacked heavily by the bloody hands group.
There are many critiques on Wen Jiabao. So the arguments on
balance can give Wen some space for his political reform speech,
and these arguments can also ease a situation
which has a strong smell of gunpowder.”
Some overseas commenter said, Wen Jiabao promoted the
spirit of academic freedom and independent thinking to seek a breakthrough for his political reform.
However, the first step for independent thinking
should be getting rid of the rigid and distorted CCP thinking.
People should see through the CCP lies.
Yang Jinxia: “Wen Jiabao’s speech is understandable,
and the world is constantly changing.
As for the credibility of his words,
I do not think that he just talked about it.
There should be a step for pushing political reform.
I really hope what he said is also what he thinks in mind
and that China will move toward democracy.”
Several media analyzed, if China will move forward
on the political reform road,
press restriction must stop in order to check on
the government effectively.
However, it is just fantasy to do so
within the CCP one-party dictatorship system.
Therefore, China will move forward on the road to real
democracy only by abandoning the CCP.
