【新唐人2012年4月11日讯】《人民日报》旗下的《环球时报》一反中共封锁方励之信息的常态，发表社评，指称方励之曾是中国有名望的科学家，这些年一事无成，默默客死他乡，说明跳到法律之外从事对抗活动，都不会有前途，社评建议人们应该在中国法律框架内推动民主建设。外界认为，这篇社论是中共害怕民运再来的一种鼓噪。
《环球时报》以“顺历史而行，个人力量才能激活”为题，指称方励之曾是中国有名望的科学家，后来因为从事政治对抗，受到美国驻华使馆的庇护，结果和其他去美国的“政治对抗者”一样一事无成，渐渐被中国社会遗忘。
大陆资深记者高瑜认为，《环球时报》是在撒谎。
高瑜：“方励之在美国20多年，无论是在学术上，还是在他的民主思想的发展，我觉得是一个非常重要的时期，他当了两届美国物理学会的会长，得了国际的物理奖，方先生曾经是中国人权的两届主席，他自己所写的文章，他所参加的一些会议，很多会议都是属于人权性质的，所以我认为《环球时报》讲的都是谎言。”
香港《动向》杂志主编张伟国认为，中共一直屏蔽方励之先生的一切信息，方励之先生去世后，中共又封锁这一消息，正说明方励之深入人心，流亡海外22年，人们也没有忘记，他说，《环球时报》这篇文章是惧怕中国再次出现民运。
张伟国：“为共产党招降纳亨，防止中国再出现方励之，它知道共产党没有合法性，老百姓要求起来革命的热情越来越高，新的天安门民主运动这样一种反抗呼之欲出，知识份子如果都能明确自己的历史责任，站到人们的一边，中国就会改变共产党一党专制的局面。”
张伟国表示，这篇文章还折射出中共御用文人的悲哀，他认为，现在社会道德的败坏和一些知识份子顺应了共产党的要求有直接关系。
张伟国：“哪怕是流亡海外22年，照样不改初衷，这才是真正意义上的知识份子，我相信不用5年10年，《环球时报》这位先生的高论就会丢进历史的垃圾堆里面，如果要回顾中国近30年来的变化，方励之先生在这中间启发青年一代追求民主自由的理想，相信是在历史上留下他的地位。”
社评声称，移居美国的那批“精英”，他们的追求和用力与中国的前进没有合上拍子，结果一事无成。
那么成功的真正内涵是什么呢？
美国乔治梅森大学教授章天亮指出，古人把人生境界分成三种，立德、立功和立言。大陆的所谓成功人士在古人三境界里是最低的层次。而在道德上无可挑剔的人，才真正称得上有成。
章天亮：“孔子也讲过一句话，邦有道，贫且贱焉，耻也，就是说，如果一个国家是有道德的话，你是贫贱的人你是可耻的。邦无道，富且贵焉，耻也，如果社会道德风气很糟糕，整个社会政治环境很黑暗的时候，你能得到富贵很有可能是一种耻辱。”
高瑜表示，专制永远是对自由和科学的扼杀，如果方励之留在国内为专制服务，他的人生会大打折扣，更重要的是，有才华的人为专制政权所用，只能给人类带来更大的灾难。
采访编辑/刘惠 后制/孙宁
======================
CCP Mouthpiece Discredits Fang Lizhi, Fearing Another Civil Uprising
The Global Times, a subsidiary of the People’s Daily,
published an article discrediting renowned Chinese scientist, Fang Lizhi.
The article says Fang did nothing with his life and died away
from home.
It also states that those who engage in protests outside
the “law” have no future.
The article urged people to push for democratic reforms
within the existing Chinese legal system.
This article is viewed by outside parties as exposing
the Chinese regime’s fear of another civil uprising.
The Global Times published an article entitled, “personal
strength can only be achieved by following history’s path,”
claiming that renowned Chinese scientist Fang Lizhi engaged
in political protest and later became a refugee in the U.S.
He and other “political protesters” were all unsuccessful
and were slowly forgotten by the Chinese society.
Renowned mainland Chinese reporter Gao Yu believes
the Global Times is lying.
Gao Yu, “Fang Lizhi spent 20+ years in the US and
had achievements both academic and democratic thinking.
I think it was a very important period.
He was president of US Physics Society for two terms, won
international physics prizes, and was president of China Human Rights for two terms.
Many of the articles Fang wrote and the meetings
he attended were related to human rights, that’s why I think Global Times is lying.”
The chief editor of Hong Kong’s Dongxiang Magazine,
Zhang Weiguo, believes the Chinese regime hid all the information about Fang Lizhi.
After Mr. Fang passed away, the CCP tried to lie and
cover up again, this shows just how important Fang Lizhi was.
After 22 years of exile overseas, people still remember him.
This article by Global Times shows the regime fear another
civil movement in China.
Zhang Weiguo, “To prevent another Fang Lizhi from
appearing, the Communist Party knows that its regime
has no legitimacy to rule and the general public’s wish
for revolution is growing more and more.
Many people are calling out for another Tiananmen democracy
movement, and if the scholars can understand their responsibility
and stand on the side of the people, then the Communist
Party’s one party rule will end in China.”
Zhang Weiguo believes this article shows the sadness
of Chinese scholars.
This is directly related to corruption of social morality
and the fact that some scholars conform to the demands of the Communist Party.
Zhang Weiguo, “Even after 22 years in exile,
he still held firm to his believe, this is a true scholar.
I think in 5 or 10 years, this article by Global Times will be
in the trashcan of history.
Looking back on China’s change over the past 30 years,
Fang Lizhi inspired a generation of young people to seek
freedom and democracy, he already has his place in history.”
The Global Times article claims that the “elites” who moved
to the U.S didn’t catch up with China’s advance, so many were unsuccessful.
What is the definition of success?
George Mason University Professor Zhang Tianliang
pointed out that the ancient Chinese divide a person’s life into three levels:
greatness in tasks, greatness in writing, greatness in virtue.
Someone with impeccable morality is the most successful.
Zhang Tianliang, “Confucius also said, ‘when a country
is virtuous, you are ashamed to be poor;
when the country is without virtue and is morality is corrupt,
being able to achieve wealth is something to be ashamed of.”
Gao Yue expressed that totalitarian rule is always
against nature and science.
If Fang Lizhi stayed in China, his life would be undermined.
Even more importantly, if a talented person services a
totalitarian regime, he or she will bring disaster to humanity.
