【新唐人2012年2月8日讯】近来，新浪微博对用户的发言控制越发严厉。2月6号，很多新浪微博用户突然被大量删帖，上了黑名单的用户更是被封号，博文全部被删除。对此，有人推测新浪微博监控系统可能已经正式启用，而随着监控系统升级，对用户的监控也更加严密。下面请看本台记者的报导。
大陆维权网站《参与网》报导说，元宵节当天，新浪微博的这次封号，不提前告知提醒用户，而是直接删除。网友查询时，看到系统提示：“该用户并不存在”，才知道账号已经被删除。
据报导，目前，新浪微博这一模仿“推特”的网络社交工具，已经拥有超过2亿5千万的注册用户。但在中共对互联网的严厉监控下，新浪经常对用户发言进行删除，甚至直接封号。去年（2011年）年底，新浪更是遵照当局指令，开始推行“微博用户实名制”。
而早在去年9月，新浪首席执行官曹国伟就对媒体表示，公司正在开发新浪微博管控系统，来监控这一新型网络媒体。
新浪的这些举措引来网民阵阵声讨。大陆知名学者于建嵘、张鸣等知名博主，因为厌恶新浪不断封号、删贴，替当局管制言论，纷纷离开新浪微博以示抗议。
也有一些博主在被封号后，再次注册新号，继续发帖表达不满，有网友直接写到“新浪无耻，再求封号！” 浙江作家、知名博主昝爱宗就曾被多次封号，最近他的第7个账号再次被封。
浙江作家、记者昝爱宗：“因为现在维稳是他们的第一任务，所以他们不择手段的来删帖、封号。现在是管得最严的时候了，可能是为了两会和18大召开，他们接到上面的指令，严格管理。”
昝爱宗表示，新浪有专用的微博监控系统和庞大的监控队伍，来对两亿多的用户进行监视、删贴、封号，从而箝制民众言论。
昝爱宗：“新浪非常无耻的，也不通知你就给删掉了，而且多次删。你不是说新浪要求实名制吗？大家都已经实名制了，它还给你删。你说这实名制有什么用？实名制也不是目地，它的目地就是不让你说话，管你实名不实名。它不让你说话，你实名也照样给你删掉。”
日前，中共宣传部门下令，将在大陆各微博成立所谓“党组织”，直接监管微博。新浪、腾讯、搜狐、网易等网站都接到相关指令。
大陆网络作家荆楚：“这样的事情太荒唐了，在现在的社会，在互联网时代，在信息公开化、思想多元化的时代，还搞这一套，那就是逆历史潮流而动。一个社会把这些封掉以后，就没有活力了。”
“权力运动”负责人胡军也对记者表示，“推特”等新型网络工具能够使信息自由快速流通，民众可以借此了解真相，这对靠谎言维持的中共独裁统治来说，是致命的威胁。
胡军：“它恐慌之中，它就是说，没有办法去挽回了，在无计可施的情况下，就是黔驴技穷的情况下，它总是想做点事情。但是越做越荒唐、越荒谬，所以笑话越来越多。你想不到的，它会做出来。”
胡军还特别提到，法轮功学员开发的“自由门”等破网软件，对于大陆人突破网络封锁，起到了很大的作用。越来越多的人们因此了解了真相、认清中共的邪恶本质，远离与抛弃了中共。
新唐人记者李丽、李谦、薛莉采访报导。
SINA Microblog Upgrades Censorship, Black Listed Accounts Are Shut Down
Censorship on the SINA micro-blog continues to intensify.
On Feb. 6th, many micro-blog posts were deleted; those on
the blacklist had their accounts disabled and all posts deleted.
Regarding this, some suggested that SINA’s content
filtering system has been enacted, and the associated censorship systems were upgraded.
Mainland Chinese Human Rights website, Canyu Network,
reported that on the day of the Lantern festival,
SINA micro-blog deleted many user accounts
without giving any notice.
When netizens search, the system shows,
“this user does not exist.” That’s how they know the account was deleted.
According to the report, as of now, SINA micro-blog social
network service, which is China’s version of twitter, already has 250 million registered users.
However, under the strict control of the Chinese regime,
SINA frequently deletes user posts, and even deletes entire accounts.
At the end of last year, SINA micro-blog followed orders
from the regime to start requiring identity verification for new micro-blog accounts, known as the “real name policy.”
As early as Sept. of last year, SINA’s chief operating officer,
Charles Chao, expressed that
SINA was coming close to launching a content filtering system
in order to control the then new social networking service.
SINA’s actions have drawn waves of criticism from its users.
Mainland’s renowned scholars Yu Jianrong, Zhang Ming and
other micro-blog owners all abandoned their SINA micro-blogs
in protest of SINA’s nonstop deletion of posts and user accounts.
Some micro-blog users registered for new accounts after
theirs were deleted, then continuously sent posts expressing their discontent.
A netizen wrote, “SINA is shameless, (I) request to get (my)
account deleted again!”
Zhejiang author and well know blog owner Zan Aizong had
his account deleted many times, and recently his 7th account was censored again.
Zan Aizong, “Since maintaining stability is their number one
mission, they delete posts and accounts via whatever means necessary.
Right now the censorship is at its worst, maybe they have
orders for strict control due to the two meetings and the 18th People’s Congress.”
Zan expressed that SINA has a specially designed
censorship system and
a large number of human censors for implementing control,
post deletion, and account deletion of the 250 million users.
Zan Aizong, “SINA is quite shameless, deleting your account
without notice, and doing it many times.
Didn’t they request everyone to use real names?
Everyone’s already using real names, but it still deletes you.
So what’s the point of this real name system?
“Real name” is not the goal; its goal is to stop you from talking,
it doesn’t care if your name is real or not.
It doesn’t want you to talk, even your real name account gets
deleted.”
Recently, the CCP Propaganda Bureau issued orders to
establish a “Party Entity” to directly control micro-blogs.
SINA, Tencent, Sohu, and NetEase all received this order.
Mainland online author Jing Chu, “This is so absurd.
In today’s society, in the Internet age, in the age of
information freedom and intellectual diversity,
(the CCP) still use these methods;
this is going backward in history.
A society that blocks all these things will have no life.”
Human Rights movement organizer Hu Jun told the reporter
that new internet tools like Twitter allow for fast flow of information.
The Chinese regime puts itself in a dangerous position when
it lies in order to rule the country.
Hu Jun, “It (Chinese regime) is terrified.
There is no way to take it back, and even though they should
stop doing, it always wants to do something.
However, what it (Chinese regime) does becomes even more
ridiculous, more absurd, even more of a laughing matter.
It will do things you can’t imagine.”
Hu Jun also pointed out that the anti-censorship software like
Free-gate developed by Falun Gong practitioners
played an important role in breaking through censorship.
More and more people now understand the truth, the evil
nature of the Chinese regime, and have chosen to leave the evil party.
NTD Reporters Li Li, Li Qian and Xue Li
