【新唐人2012年2月8日訊】近來，新浪微博對用戶的發言控制越發嚴厲。2月6號，很多新浪微博用戶突然被大量刪帖，上了黑名單的用戶更是被封號，博文全部被刪除。對此，有人推測新浪微博監控系統可能已經正式啟用，而隨著監控系統升級，對用戶的監控也更加嚴密。下面請看本臺記者的報導。
大陸維權網站《參與網》報導說，元宵節當天，新浪微博的這次封號，不提前告知提醒用戶，而是直接刪除。網友查詢時，看到系統提示：「該用戶並不存在」，才知道帳號已經被刪除。
據報導，目前，新浪微博這一模仿「推特」的網絡社交工具，已經擁有超過2億5千萬的註冊用戶。但在中共對互聯網的嚴厲監控下，新浪經常對用戶發言進行刪除，甚至直接封號。去年（2011年）年底，新浪更是遵照當局指令，開始推行「微博用戶實名制」。
而早在去年9月，新浪首席執行官曹國偉就對媒體表示，公司正在開發新浪微博管控系統，來監控這一新型網絡媒體。
新浪的這些舉措引來網民陣陣聲討。大陸知名學者于建嶸、張鳴等知名博主，因為厭惡新浪不斷封號、刪貼，替當局管制言論，紛紛離開新浪微博以示抗議。
也有一些博主在被封號後，再次註冊新號，繼續發帖表達不滿，有網友直接寫到「新浪無恥，再求封號！」 浙江作家、知名博主昝愛宗就曾被多次封號，最近他的第7個帳號再次被封。
浙江作家、記者昝愛宗：「因為現在維穩是他們的第一任務，所以他們不擇手段的來刪帖、封號。現在是管得最嚴的時候了，可能是為了兩會和18大召開，他們接到上面的指令，嚴格管理。」
昝愛宗表示，新浪有專用的微博監控系統和龐大的監控隊伍，來對兩億多的用戶進行監視、刪貼、封號，從而箝制民眾言論。
昝愛宗：「新浪非常無恥的，也不通知你就給刪掉了，而且多次刪。你不是說新浪要求實名制嗎？大家都已經實名制了，它還給你刪。你說這實名制有甚麼用？實名制也不是目地，它的目地就是不讓你說話，管你實名不實名。它不讓你說話，你實名也照樣給你刪掉。」
日前，中共宣傳部門下令，將在大陸各微博成立所謂「黨組織」，直接監管微博。新浪、騰訊、搜狐、網易等網站都接到相關指令。
大陸網絡作家荊楚：「這樣的事情太荒唐了，在現在的社會，在互聯網時代，在信息公開化、思想多元化的時代，還搞這一套，那就是逆歷史潮流而動。一個社會把這些封掉以後，就沒有活力了。」
「權力運動」負責人胡軍也對記者表示，「推特」等新型網絡工具能夠使信息自由快速流通，民眾可以藉此了解真相，這對靠謊言維持的中共獨裁統治來說，是致命的威脅。
胡軍：「它恐慌之中，它就是說，沒有辦法去挽回了，在無計可施的情況下，就是黔驢技窮的情況下，它總是想做點事情。但是越做越荒唐、越荒謬，所以笑話越來越多。你想不到的，它會做出來。」
胡軍還特別提到，法輪功學員開發的「自由門」等破網軟件，對於大陸人突破網絡封鎖，起到了很大的作用。越來越多的人們因此了解了真相、認清中共的邪惡本質，遠離與拋棄了中共。
新唐人記者李麗、李謙、薛莉採訪報導。
SINA Microblog Upgrades Censorship, Black Listed Accounts Are Shut Down
Censorship on the SINA micro-blog continues to intensify.
On Feb. 6th, many micro-blog posts were deleted; those on
the blacklist had their accounts disabled and all posts deleted.
Regarding this, some suggested that SINA’s content
filtering system has been enacted, and the associated censorship systems were upgraded.
Mainland Chinese Human Rights website, Canyu Network,
reported that on the day of the Lantern festival,
SINA micro-blog deleted many user accounts
without giving any notice.
When netizens search, the system shows,
“this user does not exist.” That’s how they know the account was deleted.
According to the report, as of now, SINA micro-blog social
network service, which is China’s version of twitter, already has 250 million registered users.
However, under the strict control of the Chinese regime,
SINA frequently deletes user posts, and even deletes entire accounts.
At the end of last year, SINA micro-blog followed orders
from the regime to start requiring identity verification for new micro-blog accounts, known as the “real name policy.”
As early as Sept. of last year, SINA’s chief operating officer,
Charles Chao, expressed that
SINA was coming close to launching a content filtering system
in order to control the then new social networking service.
SINA’s actions have drawn waves of criticism from its users.
Mainland’s renowned scholars Yu Jianrong, Zhang Ming and
other micro-blog owners all abandoned their SINA micro-blogs
in protest of SINA’s nonstop deletion of posts and user accounts.
Some micro-blog users registered for new accounts after
theirs were deleted, then continuously sent posts expressing their discontent.
A netizen wrote, “SINA is shameless, (I) request to get (my)
account deleted again!”
Zhejiang author and well know blog owner Zan Aizong had
his account deleted many times, and recently his 7th account was censored again.
Zan Aizong, “Since maintaining stability is their number one
mission, they delete posts and accounts via whatever means necessary.
Right now the censorship is at its worst, maybe they have
orders for strict control due to the two meetings and the 18th People’s Congress.”
Zan expressed that SINA has a specially designed
censorship system and
a large number of human censors for implementing control,
post deletion, and account deletion of the 250 million users.
Zan Aizong, “SINA is quite shameless, deleting your account
without notice, and doing it many times.
Didn’t they request everyone to use real names?
Everyone’s already using real names, but it still deletes you.
So what’s the point of this real name system?
“Real name” is not the goal; its goal is to stop you from talking,
it doesn’t care if your name is real or not.
It doesn’t want you to talk, even your real name account gets
deleted.”
Recently, the CCP Propaganda Bureau issued orders to
establish a “Party Entity” to directly control micro-blogs.
SINA, Tencent, Sohu, and NetEase all received this order.
Mainland online author Jing Chu, “This is so absurd.
In today’s society, in the Internet age, in the age of
information freedom and intellectual diversity,
(the CCP) still use these methods;
this is going backward in history.
A society that blocks all these things will have no life.”
Human Rights movement organizer Hu Jun told the reporter
that new internet tools like Twitter allow for fast flow of information.
The Chinese regime puts itself in a dangerous position when
it lies in order to rule the country.
Hu Jun, “It (Chinese regime) is terrified.
There is no way to take it back, and even though they should
stop doing, it always wants to do something.
However, what it (Chinese regime) does becomes even more
ridiculous, more absurd, even more of a laughing matter.
It will do things you can’t imagine.”
Hu Jun also pointed out that the anti-censorship software like
Free-gate developed by Falun Gong practitioners
played an important role in breaking through censorship.
More and more people now understand the truth, the evil
nature of the Chinese regime, and have chosen to leave the evil party.
NTD Reporters Li Li, Li Qian and Xue Li
