【新唐人2011年11月16日讯】北京大学中文系教授孔庆东用粗话辱骂记者、并通过微博炫耀的事件（简称“三妈的”事件），目前还在持续发酵。最近，北大学生发起辞退孔庆东的活动，认为：孔庆东身为教授，却经常公开宣扬暴力，北大应该将他解聘。请看本台记者的报导。
北大教授孔庆东骂人事件越演越烈，大陆《羊城晚报》报导，有学生在北大BBS﹙“未名”﹚上发出一封信，要求校方“惩戒公开宣扬暴力的孔庆东”，将他辞退。信中写道，孔庆东爆粗口骂人应该受到谴责，但更严重的是他经常在公共场合宣扬暴力。
这封信认为，孔庆东对他人赤裸裸的暴力威胁，已经远远超出言论自由的范围，也违背教师基本伦理。北大校委会应当对他进行惩戒。
很多北大同学对这封信表示赞同，纷纷跟帖支持“惩戒孔庆东”。同学还揭示，孔庆东鼓吹文革，经常满口脏话，辱骂国人“无耻”、“哭爹喊娘看美国大片”。虽然也有学生为孔庆东辩护，但很明显，支持惩戒孔庆东的人占了大多数。
山东大学退休教授孙文广：“我觉得，这个是很正常的现象。多数学生还是希望社会多一些文明，特别是教师，你当众爆粗口的话，对社会风气当然是很不利的。”
孙文广教授也对北大学生的做法表示赞赏。
孙文广教授：“学生呢，在过去，对一些违背道德、违背文明的一些校方干部或者是老师，往往无动于衷，就是不管这些事了，往往是念我的书、读我的学位。那么现在呢，他们认识到自己的权利，来履行自己的权利，这个应该受到支持的。”
北大学生的这一活动也得到其他网民的支持，网友在《凯迪社区》进行了一个调查，结果支持开除孔庆东的有367人，反对的仅有71人。
但截至目前，北大校方并没有对学生们的这封信作出任何回应。《新唐人》想电话采访北大老师，但对方表示，孔庆东这个问题，北大老师不方便接受采访。
孙文广教授：“校方呢，我估计，它是极力保留，希望他还能继续教书，最多让他认个错，这样就过去。如果这个老师不是说反对政府，或者（类似）这种行为，他们一般都会采取一种保护的态度。”
在孔庆东的个人博客上，孔庆东自称祖籍山东，是孔子第73代直系传人，中共党员。
文革中，孔子被当局大肆批判、孔庙被毁、孔子后人被迫害，而自称孔子直系传人的孔庆东却经常在媒体上公开吹捧文革、大赞红卫兵。他还吹捧毛泽东、金正日，被大陆左派们视为领军人物。他更是经常辱骂民主人士、号称大陆敢言媒体——南方报系是“汉奸媒体”，而这一次骂人事件中，被他辱骂的就是《南方人物周刊》记者。
利比亚卡扎菲独裁政权垮台后，孔庆东也曾在电视上公开吹捧“卡扎菲是大侠”，指责“西方没人性”。
大陆新闻界人士李悔之发表博文指出，孔庆东之所以如此毫无忌惮，骂民主、骂普世价值、骂“汉奸”，是因为孔庆东很世俗、很实用——他现在在体制内吹捧“主旋律”，如鱼得水。而一旦到了民主体制，他的言行也将得到法律保护，他甚至可以掉过头来痛批政府。李悔之总结说，孔庆东绝不“蠢”，但他只是金钱物质上的“”赢家”。
北大学生发出的这封信还提到，2009年，孔庆东的助理杨春就曾用刀捅伤《新京报》编辑徐来，仅仅因为徐来曾经写文章批评孔庆东。杨春因此获刑4年半。北大学生呼吁校委会惩戒孔庆东，防止发生更严重事故。
新唐人记者常春、李谦、肖颜采访报导。
Peking University Students Urge Kong Qingdong’s Dismissal
verbally abused a reporter and bragged about it on a blog.
This ongoing event continues to develop.
Recently, a Peking University student initiated a campaign to
dismiss Kong, stating that as a professor,
Kong often publicly promotes violence,
thus the school authorities should dismiss him.
Reaction to Peking University professor Kong Qingdong’s
abusive behavior has been intensifying.
Yangcheng Evening News reported
that a student posted a letter on Peking University’s BBS,
urging university authorities to “punish Kong Qingdong who
openly promotes violence,” and dismiss him.
The letter said that Kong blurted out curse words
and should be punished; however, the more serious concern involves Kong’s public promotion of violence.
The letter stated that Kong’s threats of violence to others,
is far beyond the scope of freedom of speech and also violates basic teacher ethics.
The urged the Peking University School Board to
punish him.
Many Peking University students posted online comments
in support of the letter.
Students also revealed that Kong Qingdong supported
the Cultural Revolution, often swearing like a gang member.
He insults the Chinese people “shameless” and blames them
for watching Hollywood movies.
Some students defended Kong, however, the majority of
students obviously wanted to see Kong punished.
Sun Wenguang, a retired professor at Shandong University:
“I think this is quite normal.
Most students still expect society to be more civilized,
especially teachers.
When a person curses in public, it certainly won’t
help promote civility in society or do anything to improve society’s morals.”
Professor Sun expressed his appreciation
for the Peking University’s student’s responses.
Professor Sun Wenguang: “In the past, students were often
indifferent to school authority’s unethical actions involving management or teachers.
They only cared about their studies.
But now, they are aware of their rights
and are putting them into practice. So their actions have lent support to the situation.”
The campaign initiated by Peking University students has also
gained supports from netizens.
A survey on Club.kdnet.net shows that 367 netizens supported
the decision to dismiss Kong, with only 71 objecting.
However, to date, the Peking University authorities
have not yet responded to the letter.
A Peking University teacher told NTD TV
that regarding the issue of Kong, it would be inappropriate for them to be interviewed.
Professor Sun Wenguang: “I believe the University authorities
may retain Kong’s teaching position.
They’ll simply make him recognize his mistake, at most,
and the matter will be forgotten.
If a teacher isn’t against the authorities, or has no
anti-CCP behaviors, the authorities will usually take a protective attitude toward him or her."
In Kong Qingdong’s blog, he claimed to be a native of
Shandong, a 73rd generation descendant of the great Chinese thinker and philosopher, Confucius.
Kong is member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
During the Cultural Revolution, Confucius was wantonly
criticized by the CCP authorities.
The Confucius Temple was ruined and descendants of
Confucius were persecuted.
However, professing to be Confucius descendant,
Kong Qingdong was often lavishly praised, via media,
regarding the Cultural Revolution, the Red Guards,
Mao Zedong, and Kim Jong-il.
Kong is regarded as a leader of the China’s Left forces.
Moreover, Kong often abuses democratic activists,
swearing at dare-to-speak Nangfang Daily Press as
a “traitorous media.” What he abused was the reporter
from the Nanfang People Weekly.
After Moammar Gadhafi’s regime collapsed in Libya,
Kong openly praised him on TV declaring, “Gaddafi is a hero,"
and accusing the West of “having no humanity.”
A media professional, Li Huizhi, said in his blog that
the reason behind Kong’s uncontrollable abuse of democratic and universal values
and his labeling the Nangfang Daily Press as a “traitor,"
is the fact that Kong is very vulgar and very pragmatic.
Now, he goes along with the CCP’s “theme,”
just like a fish in water.
But once he is in a democratic society,
his words and actions will also be protected by law.
He can then turns around and criticize the CCP authorities.
Li’s article concluded that Kong is absolutely not “stupid."
He is only after financial gain.
The Peking University student letter mentioned that in 2009,
Kong’s assistant, Yang Chun, stabbed a Beijing News editor,
Xu Lai, with a knife, simply because Xu wrote an article
criticizing Kong.
Yang Chun was jailed for four and a half years.
Peking University students urged the school board to
punish Kong in order to prevent more serious accidents from occurring.
NTD reporters Chang Chun, Li Qian and Xiao Yan
