【新唐人2011年11月16日訊】北京大學中文系教授孔慶東用粗話辱罵記者、並通過微博炫耀的事件（簡稱「三媽的」事件），目前還在持續發酵。最近，北大學生發起辭退孔慶東的活動，認為：孔慶東身為教授，卻經常公開宣揚暴力，北大應該將他解聘。請看本臺記者的報導。
北大教授孔慶東罵人事件越演越烈，大陸《羊城晚報》報導，有學生在北大BBS﹙「未名」﹚上發出一封信，要求校方「懲戒公開宣揚暴力的孔慶東」，將他辭退。信中寫道，孔慶東爆粗口罵人應該受到譴責，但更嚴重的是他經常在公共場合宣揚暴力。
這封信認為，孔慶東對他人赤裸裸的暴力威脅，已經遠遠超出言論自由的範圍，也違背教師基本倫理。北大校委會應當對他進行懲戒。
很多北大同學對這封信表示贊同，紛紛跟帖支持「懲戒孔慶東」。同學還揭示，孔慶東鼓吹文革，經常滿口髒話，辱罵國人「無恥」、「哭爹喊娘看美國大片」。雖然也有學生為孔慶東辯護，但很明顯，支持懲戒孔慶東的人佔了大多數。
山東大學退休教授孫文廣：「我覺得，這個是很正常的現象。多數學生還是希望社會多一些文明，特別是教師，你當眾爆粗口的話，對社會風氣當然是很不利的。」
孫文廣教授也對北大學生的做法表示讚賞。
孫文廣教授：「學生呢，在過去，對一些違背道德、違背文明的一些校方幹部或者是老師，往往無動於衷，就是不管這些事了，往往是念我的書、讀我的學位。那麼現在呢，他們認識到自己的權利，來履行自己的權利，這個應該受到支持的。」
北大學生的這一活動也得到其他網民的支持，網友在《凱迪社區》進行了一個調查，結果支持開除孔慶東的有367人，反對的僅有71人。
但截至目前，北大校方並沒有對學生們的這封信作出任何回應。《新唐人》想電話採訪北大老師，但對方表示，孔慶東這個問題，北大老師不方便接受採訪。
孫文廣教授：「校方呢，我估計，它是極力保留，希望他還能繼續教書，最多讓他認個錯，這樣就過去。如果這個老師不是說反對政府，或者（類似）這種行為，他們一般都會採取一種保護的態度。」
在孔慶東的個人博客上，孔慶東自稱祖籍山東，是孔子第73代直系傳人，中共黨員。
文革中，孔子被當局大肆批判、孔廟被毀、孔子後人被迫害，而自稱孔子直系傳人的孔慶東卻經常在媒體上公開吹捧文革、大讚紅衛兵。他還吹捧毛澤東、金正日，被大陸左派們視為領軍人物。他更是經常辱罵民主人士、號稱大陸敢言媒體——南方報系是「漢奸媒體」，而這一次罵人事件中，被他辱罵的就是《南方人物週刊》記者。
利比亞卡扎菲獨裁政權垮臺後，孔慶東也曾在電視上公開吹捧「卡扎菲是大俠」，指責「西方沒人性」。
大陸新聞界人士李悔之發表博文指出，孔慶東之所以如此毫無忌憚，罵民主、罵普世價值、罵「漢奸」，是因為孔慶東很世俗、很實用——他現在在體制內吹捧「主旋律」，如魚得水。而一旦到了民主體制，他的言行也將得到法律保護，他甚至可以掉過頭來痛批政府。李悔之總結說，孔慶東絕不「蠢」，但他只是金錢物質上的「」贏家」。
北大學生發出的這封信還提到，2009年，孔慶東的助理楊春就曾用刀捅傷《新京報》編輯徐來，僅僅因為徐來曾經寫文章批評孔慶東。楊春因此獲刑4年半。北大學生呼籲校委會懲戒孔慶東，防止發生更嚴重事故。
新唐人記者常春、李謙、肖顏採訪報導。
Peking University Students Urge Kong Qingdong』s Dismissal
verbally abused a reporter and bragged about it on a blog.
This ongoing event continues to develop.
Recently, a Peking University student initiated a campaign to
dismiss Kong, stating that as a professor,
Kong often publicly promotes violence,
thus the school authorities should dismiss him.
Reaction to Peking University professor Kong Qingdong』s
abusive behavior has been intensifying.
Yangcheng Evening News reported
that a student posted a letter on Peking University』s BBS,
urging university authorities to “punish Kong Qingdong who
openly promotes violence,” and dismiss him.
The letter said that Kong blurted out curse words
and should be punished; however, the more serious concern involves Kong』s public promotion of violence.
The letter stated that Kong』s threats of violence to others,
is far beyond the scope of freedom of speech and also violates basic teacher ethics.
The urged the Peking University School Board to
punish him.
Many Peking University students posted online comments
in support of the letter.
Students also revealed that Kong Qingdong supported
the Cultural Revolution, often swearing like a gang member.
He insults the Chinese people “shameless” and blames them
for watching Hollywood movies.
Some students defended Kong, however, the majority of
students obviously wanted to see Kong punished.
Sun Wenguang, a retired professor at Shandong University:
“I think this is quite normal.
Most students still expect society to be more civilized,
especially teachers.
When a person curses in public, it certainly won』t
help promote civility in society or do anything to improve society』s morals.”
Professor Sun expressed his appreciation
for the Peking University』s student』s responses.
Professor Sun Wenguang: “In the past, students were often
indifferent to school authority』s unethical actions involving management or teachers.
They only cared about their studies.
But now, they are aware of their rights
and are putting them into practice. So their actions have lent support to the situation.”
The campaign initiated by Peking University students has also
gained supports from netizens.
A survey on Club.kdnet.net shows that 367 netizens supported
the decision to dismiss Kong, with only 71 objecting.
However, to date, the Peking University authorities
have not yet responded to the letter.
A Peking University teacher told NTD TV
that regarding the issue of Kong, it would be inappropriate for them to be interviewed.
Professor Sun Wenguang: “I believe the University authorities
may retain Kong』s teaching position.
They』ll simply make him recognize his mistake, at most,
and the matter will be forgotten.
If a teacher isn』t against the authorities, or has no
anti-CCP behaviors, the authorities will usually take a protective attitude toward him or her."
In Kong Qingdong』s blog, he claimed to be a native of
Shandong, a 73rd generation descendant of the great Chinese thinker and philosopher, Confucius.
Kong is member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
During the Cultural Revolution, Confucius was wantonly
criticized by the CCP authorities.
The Confucius Temple was ruined and descendants of
Confucius were persecuted.
However, professing to be Confucius descendant,
Kong Qingdong was often lavishly praised, via media,
regarding the Cultural Revolution, the Red Guards,
Mao Zedong, and Kim Jong-il.
Kong is regarded as a leader of the China』s Left forces.
Moreover, Kong often abuses democratic activists,
swearing at dare-to-speak Nangfang Daily Press as
a “traitorous media.” What he abused was the reporter
from the Nanfang People Weekly.
After Moammar Gadhafi』s regime collapsed in Libya,
Kong openly praised him on TV declaring, “Gaddafi is a hero,"
and accusing the West of “having no humanity.”
A media professional, Li Huizhi, said in his blog that
the reason behind Kong』s uncontrollable abuse of democratic and universal values
and his labeling the Nangfang Daily Press as a “traitor,"
is the fact that Kong is very vulgar and very pragmatic.
Now, he goes along with the CCP』s “theme,”
just like a fish in water.
But once he is in a democratic society,
his words and actions will also be protected by law.
He can then turns around and criticize the CCP authorities.
Li』s article concluded that Kong is absolutely not “stupid."
He is only after financial gain.
The Peking University student letter mentioned that in 2009,
Kong』s assistant, Yang Chun, stabbed a Beijing News editor,
Xu Lai, with a knife, simply because Xu wrote an article
criticizing Kong.
Yang Chun was jailed for four and a half years.
Peking University students urged the school board to
punish Kong in order to prevent more serious accidents from occurring.
NTD reporters Chang Chun, Li Qian and Xiao Yan
