【新唐人2011年11月15日讯】中共喉舌《央视》对“中国电信”和“联通”正在接受发改委“反垄断调查”的报导，引来《人民邮电报》言辞激烈的驳斥。一场“反垄断”报导演变成了两大中共媒体的公开对阵。而另一中共喉舌媒体《新华社》也因发表文章批评北大教授孔庆东而惹祸上身。孔庆东炮轰《新华社》带头制作虚假新闻，要求《新华社》向全国人民道歉。
《邮电报》11号的头版文章对《央视》提出四大质问，《邮电报》问《央视》：“基本概念厘清了吗？垄断事实查明了吗？全球行情吃准了吗？新闻素养丢掉了吗？”
11月9号中午，《央视》《新闻30分》节目曝出国家发改委正对“中国电信”和“中国联通”进行反垄断调查的报导后，两家电信龙头股票应声狂跌。
然而，仅仅事隔一天，一场原本颇吸引眼球的“反垄断”报导就演变成两家媒体的互相“掐架”。《邮电报》发表文章，逐一驳斥《央视》报导内容，炮轰《央视》“混淆视听，误导公众”。
《人民邮电报》隶属“中国工业和信息化部”。一个通信行业的媒体公开反驳《央视》的反垄断新闻报导，言辞犀利，锋芒毕露，着实罕见。
“中国人民大学”商学院院长助理刘刚教授分析认为，这次反垄断实质上是“广电和电信之争”的延续。有网友戏称事件是“既得利益集团之间狗咬狗”。
因为《央视》等中共媒体不时爆出造假新闻，因此有大批网民对《央视》被骂臭大呼过瘾。不过，网友们似乎也不支持《邮电报》论点，认为“中国电信”和“联通”本身的价格就是存在垄断现象。
与此同时，《新华社》也陷入另一场骂战之中。
北大教授孔庆东近来“三骂”《南方》报系记者事件，引发了大陆媒体和舆论的“倒孔潮”，尤其引人注目的是，《新华社》也加入了“批孔行列”，《新华社》批评孔庆东把辱骂记者的粗鲁当个性，敦促北大解聘孔庆东。
原公安大学法律系讲师、资深法学专家赵远明认为，“孔庆东骂人”之所以有市场，是因为他深知有这样的土壤，相当一部分中国人在中共的统治下已经道德沦丧。
赵远明：“以中共邪党的利益为第一，只要对维护中共邪党统治有利，那麽你什么事都可以做。而且他们崇尚无神论，所以他不讲究来世，也不讲究因果报应。作为孔庆东这些人，只要我高兴，我什么脏话都骂的出来，我不管我是不是教授。”
孔庆东毫不示弱，反驳《新华社》的文章是公然对抗新闻出版总署和宪法。孔庆东指责《新华社》带头制作虚假新闻，多次撒谎造谣、顶风作案，必须向中国人民道歉。
与其他中共媒体一样，《新华社》屡次传出造假新闻。连中共主席胡锦涛08年视察山东省青岛照片也被披露造假。当时就有网友嘲讽：“连胡主席的照片都是假的，还有什么是真的！”
《华龙网》传媒公司签约公益歌手杨银波认为，就算是官方媒体，报导新闻都要以事实为基础。
杨银波：“但凡是做媒体的，做新闻必须以事实为基础。如果是这样的一种体制导致他必须要以体制性的撒谎，这个才是根本问题，这个才是最值得注意的。人，不管他是体制内还是体制外，他都应该遵循这样的一个规律，否则的话是经不起历史检验的。所以民智渐开啊，这个对官方来说是一个蛮紧张的事情。”
文章“新华社无公信力，没资格给孔庆东当判官。”质疑：《新华社》就有公信力吗？文章问：一个如此影响巨大的媒体，竟敢光天化日之下造谣，还配做媒体吗？
新唐人记者常春、 王子琦、 郭敬采访报导。
CCP Mouthpieces at War with Kong Qingdong
CCP’s mouthpiece CCTV, recently reported that China Telecom
and China Unicom are being investigated for charge of monopoly.
This report received fierce criticism from People’s Post and
Telecommunication.
An “anti-monopoly” report became a platform for a public fight
between CCP’s two major mouthpiece media.
Xinhua News Agency also got into trouble for criticizing Kong
Qingdong, professor at Beijing University.
Kong charged Xinhua for false reporting and
requested an apology.
On Nov.11 an article in the Post and Telecommunication
posed 4 questions against CCTV: Are you clear about the basic concepts?
Have you clarified the basic facts? Do you understand the
global market? Do you still have professional spirits?
On Nov. 9, CCTV reported a monopoly investigation of
the two companies , National Development and Reform Commission.
Soon after, the two companies’ stocks plunged.
The next day this eye-catching “anti-monopoly" report turned
into a quarrel between the two media companies.
People’s Post refuted the CCTV report with specific charges,
blaming it for confusing and misleading the public.
People’s Post belongs to China’s Department of Industry and
Information Technology.
It is rare to see such a fierce public rebuttal against CCTV.
Liu Gang, Business School professor at Renmin University,
said that,”this fight is a continuation of the struggle between
China’s departments of broadcasting and telecommunications”.
Netizens called this event “a dogfight between interest groups.”
CCTV is infamous for fraudulence. Many netizens verified
they are against such an attack , and that they do not support Post,
since China Telecom and Unicom monopolize the market.
Xinhua Agency is reportedly involved in another battle.
Peking University professor Kong Qingdong recently cursed
Nanfang Daily reporters with three dirty sentences.
The public, including Xinhua Agency criticized Kong, urging
Beijing University to dismiss him.
Zhao Yuanming, former lecturer of law at China’s Public
Security University stated,
“the social environment provided soil for Kong.
CCP’s rule caused many Chinese people to lose their morality”.
Zhao Yuanming also claimed,
“CCP puts its own interests first.
Besides, they advocate atheism, denouncing any form of
karmic retribution.
People like Kong Qingdong will just curse whatever comes
to mind, with no concern for being a professor”.
Kong refuted the charges, saying Xinhua Agency violates order
from China’s General Administration of Press and Publication.
Kong accuses Xinhua for taking the lead in producing false news,
and thus must apologize to the people of China .
Like other CCP mouthpiece media, Xinhua Agency repeatedly
spreads false news, including Hu Jintao’s visit to Qingdao, China.
Netizens questioned, “If even the president’s photos are fake,
what could be true!?"
Yang Yinbo, signed singer of DragonSoft media company, said
“Official media should take the lead to respect the truth.
Yang Yinbo: “The media must also respect facts.
If the political system leads to institutionalized lying,
the system is the fundamental problem.
Whether inside or outside CCP’s institutions,
one should follow the law of truth to stand the trial of history.
People are becoming more and more enlightened, which is a disturbing fact to CCP officials”.
An article “Xinhua Agency Has no Credibility to Judge Kong”
questioned,
“When Xinhua News Agency, an influential medium
produces rumors in broad daylight, does it still qualify as a medium?”
NTDTV reporters Chang Chun, Wang Ziqi
