【新唐人2011年11月15日訊】中共喉舌《央視》對「中國電信」和「聯通」正在接受發改委「反壟斷調查」的報導，引來《人民郵電報》言辭激烈的駁斥。一場「反壟斷」報導演變成了兩大中共媒體的公開對陣。而另一中共喉舌媒體《新華社》也因發表文章批評北大教授孔慶東而惹禍上身。孔慶東炮轟《新華社》帶頭製作虛假新聞，要求《新華社》向全國人民道歉。
《郵電報》11號的頭版文章對《央視》提出四大質問，《郵電報》問《央視》：「基本概念釐清了嗎？壟斷事實查明瞭嗎？全球行情吃準了嗎？新聞素養丟掉了嗎？」
11月9號中午，《央視》《新聞30分》節目曝出國家發改委正對「中國電信」和「中國聯通」進行反壟斷調查的報導後，兩家電信龍頭股票應聲狂跌。
然而，僅僅事隔一天，一場原本頗吸引眼球的「反壟斷」報導就演變成兩家媒體的互相「掐架」。《郵電報》發表文章，逐一駁斥《央視》報導內容，砲轟《央視》「混淆視聽，誤導公眾」。
《人民郵電報》隸屬「中國工業和信息化部」。一個通信行業的媒體公開反駁《央視》的反壟斷新聞報導，言辭犀利，鋒芒畢露，著實罕見。
「中國人民大學」商學院院長助理劉剛教授分析認為，這次反壟斷實質上是「廣電和電信之爭」的延續。有網友戲稱事件是「既得利益集團之間狗咬狗」。
因爲《央視》等中共媒體不時爆出造假新聞，因此有大批網民對《央視》被罵臭大呼過癮。不過，網友們似乎也不支持《郵電報》論點，認爲「中國電信」和「聯通」本身的價格就是存在壟斷現象。
與此同時，《新華社》也陷入另一場罵戰之中。
北大教授孔慶東近來「三罵」《南方》報系記者事件，引發了大陸媒體和輿論的「倒孔潮」，尤其引人注目的是，《新華社》也加入了「批孔行列」，《新華社》批評孔慶東把辱罵記者的粗魯當個性，敦促北大解聘孔慶東。
原公安大學法律系講師、資深法學專家趙遠明認爲，「孔慶東駡人」之所以有市場，是因爲他深知有這樣的土壤，相當一部分中國人在中共的統治下已經道德淪喪。
趙遠明：「以中共邪黨的利益為第一，只要對維護中共邪黨統治有利，那麽你甚麽事都可以做。而且他們崇尚無神論，所以他不講究來世，也不講究因果報應。作爲孔慶東這些人，只要我高興，我甚麽髒話都罵的出來，我不管我是不是教授。」
孔慶東毫不示弱，反駁《新華社》的文章是公然對抗新聞出版總署和憲法。孔慶東指責《新華社》帶頭製作虛假新聞，多次撒謊造謠、頂風作案，必須向中國人民道歉。
與其他中共媒體一樣，《新華社》屢次傳出造假新聞。連中共主席胡錦濤08年視察山東省青島照片也被披露造假。當時就有網友嘲諷：「連胡主席的照片都是假的，還有甚麼是真的！」
《華龍網》傳媒公司簽約公益歌手楊銀波認爲，就算是官方媒體，報導新聞都要以事實為基礎。
楊銀波：「但凡是做媒體的，做新聞必須以事實為基礎。如果是這樣的一種體制導致他必須要以體制性的撒謊，這個才是根本問題，這個才是最值得注意的。人，不管他是體制內還是體制外，他都應該遵循這樣的一個規律，否則的話是經不起歷史檢驗的。所以民智漸開啊，這個對官方來説是一個蠻緊張的事情。」
文章「新華社無公信力，沒資格給孔慶東當判官。」質疑：《新華社》就有公信力嗎？文章問：一個如此影響巨大的媒體，竟敢光天化日之下造謠，還配做媒體嗎？
新唐人記者常春、 王子琦、 郭敬採訪報導。
CCP Mouthpieces at War with Kong Qingdong
CCP』s mouthpiece CCTV, recently reported that China Telecom
and China Unicom are being investigated for charge of monopoly.
This report received fierce criticism from People’s Post and
Telecommunication.
An “anti-monopoly” report became a platform for a public fight
between CCP』s two major mouthpiece media.
Xinhua News Agency also got into trouble for criticizing Kong
Qingdong, professor at Beijing University.
Kong charged Xinhua for false reporting and
requested an apology.
On Nov.11 an article in the Post and Telecommunication
posed 4 questions against CCTV: Are you clear about the basic concepts?
Have you clarified the basic facts? Do you understand the
global market? Do you still have professional spirits?
On Nov. 9, CCTV reported a monopoly investigation of
the two companies , National Development and Reform Commission.
Soon after, the two companies』 stocks plunged.
The next day this eye-catching “anti-monopoly" report turned
into a quarrel between the two media companies.
People’s Post refuted the CCTV report with specific charges,
blaming it for confusing and misleading the public.
People’s Post belongs to China』s Department of Industry and
Information Technology.
It is rare to see such a fierce public rebuttal against CCTV.
Liu Gang, Business School professor at Renmin University,
said that,”this fight is a continuation of the struggle between
China』s departments of broadcasting and telecommunications”.
Netizens called this event “a dogfight between interest groups.”
CCTV is infamous for fraudulence. Many netizens verified
they are against such an attack , and that they do not support Post,
since China Telecom and Unicom monopolize the market.
Xinhua Agency is reportedly involved in another battle.
Peking University professor Kong Qingdong recently cursed
Nanfang Daily reporters with three dirty sentences.
The public, including Xinhua Agency criticized Kong, urging
Beijing University to dismiss him.
Zhao Yuanming, former lecturer of law at China』s Public
Security University stated,
“the social environment provided soil for Kong.
CCP』s rule caused many Chinese people to lose their morality”.
Zhao Yuanming also claimed,
“CCP puts its own interests first.
Besides, they advocate atheism, denouncing any form of
karmic retribution.
People like Kong Qingdong will just curse whatever comes
to mind, with no concern for being a professor”.
Kong refuted the charges, saying Xinhua Agency violates order
from China』s General Administration of Press and Publication.
Kong accuses Xinhua for taking the lead in producing false news,
and thus must apologize to the people of China .
Like other CCP mouthpiece media, Xinhua Agency repeatedly
spreads false news, including Hu Jintao』s visit to Qingdao, China.
Netizens questioned, “If even the president』s photos are fake,
what could be true!?"
Yang Yinbo, signed singer of DragonSoft media company, said
“Official media should take the lead to respect the truth.
Yang Yinbo: “The media must also respect facts.
If the political system leads to institutionalized lying,
the system is the fundamental problem.
Whether inside or outside CCP』s institutions,
one should follow the law of truth to stand the trial of history.
People are becoming more and more enlightened, which is a disturbing fact to CCP officials”.
An article “Xinhua Agency Has no Credibility to Judge Kong”
questioned,
“When Xinhua News Agency, an influential medium
produces rumors in broad daylight, does it still qualify as a medium?”
NTDTV reporters Chang Chun, Wang Ziqi
