【新唐人2011年9月13日讯】中共副外长傅莹11号在斯洛维尼亚怒斥欧洲国家，声称欧洲国家难以接受中共的政治制度，损害了欧洲在华形象。她还警告说，中欧关系面临的最大挑战是欧洲双重标准，造成的双方缺乏互信。评论认为，傅莹的做法并不新鲜，只不过还是“鹦鹉学舌”，党让说啥就说啥。
傅莹在斯洛维尼亚一次有关欧中关系的辩论会上警告，欧洲人对中国抱有成见，难以接受中共的政治制度。她把这称作是“欧洲对中国的偏见”，损害了欧洲在华形象，她并且要求欧洲“去除这些无用的壁垒和偏见”。
知名时政、经济评论人李剑芒：“这种事是比较蠢的。如果你自己做对了的话也无所谓难堪不难堪。本来（中国的）人权记录就比较差。欧洲人凭什么关心中国人的人权？这是要问你自己（中共）造成什么问题了，你造成问题你影响整个世界了。”
那么傅莹这里所提到的欧洲国家，为什么要关注中国的人权状况呢？
独立学者，政论作家杜导斌：“欧洲人知道这套东西的过去，那麽欧洲人反对这套制度，断言这套制度是没前途的，那是有道理的。哈耶克他们感触过了，中国现在的这一套，那麽它往前面走，和纳粹那个国家社会的那一套是同样一个东西，就是对社会进行管制，进行控制，忽视个人人权来达到所谓整体的发展。”
此外，傅莹批评，除政治和人权外，欧洲对中国经济也实施了双重标准。她说，欧洲拒绝接受中国政治制度的同时却希望分享中国的经济发展。
独立学者、政论作家杜导斌认为，实际上傅莹把中共和中国，以致中国人民这些概念捆在一起，混淆视听。
独立学者、政论作家杜导斌：“欧洲现在是中国的第一大贸易伙伴。欧洲反的是共产党。说白了就是这样，欧洲要参与中国的发展，它要跟中国人民共享发展，它不要跟共产党共同瓜分、垄断利益。欧洲要共同发展的中国人，它要拒绝的就是中国共产党。欧洲人没有错，根本就没有错！”
不过，外界舆论认为，中共一直试图运用“订单外交”羁绊欧洲，甚至通过大财团牵制美国政界。而当西方国家对中国的人权状况提出批评时，中共总是用所谓的“国情不同”、“勿干涉中国内政”等借口予以抵赖。
独立学者，政论作家杜导斌：“基本上这一代中国（中共）的外交家，全部都是垃圾，一个傅莹，一个李肇星。他们维护的是一个党的利益，不是维护中国的利益。中国（中共）的外交是面临着和中国的国家利益相互对抗，相互脱离了。”
此外，傅莹还提到，中共总理温家宝6月访问英国时，英国首相卡梅伦指出：只有改善人权，经济才能更稳定。傅莹隐射伦敦8月的骚乱，讽刺说，中国民众都很困惑，显然英国经济不够稳定。
大陆作家顾晓军：“她的潜台词不就是不能议论我们吗？这样是不合适的。别人有议论的权利，别人有谈看法的权利。作为一个副外长，这样发火在外交场合是有失风度的。态度比较蛮横，自己制定政治规则，影响很不好的。”
不过，讽刺的是，傅莹指称欧洲对中国实施了双重标准，但就在不久前，傅莹在中国的经济、军事、人权等方面舌战德国《明镜周刊》，德文完全版被曝光上网，中共驻德国使馆发布的中文版全文，不仅对对话原文进行删减，还根据需要新增不少内容。
知名时政、经济评论人李剑芒：“我还是感觉这个层次的官员只是在那‘鹦鹉学舌’，（中共）政府要求怎么说她们就怎么说。不是什么新鲜态度，每次她们都这么说。只是大家在嘴上斗斗嘴而已，政治体制安全？中国（中共政府）自己最清楚，否则的话花那麽多钱维稳干嘛！”
新唐人记者常春、王子琦、张健采访报导。
=====
Fu Ying Rebukes Europe
（主播）
Fu Ying, Vice Foreign Minister of China, rebuked
European countries in Slovenia on September 11.
She said that the image of Europe in China is undermined
since European countries cannot recognize
the political system of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
She also warned that China-EU relations will be damaged
by EU’s ”double standard,” which brings lack of mutual trust.
According to the public, Fu’s words are not something new,
but only “parrot talk" dictated by the CCP.
正文
At EU-China relations’ meeting in Slovenia, Fu Ying warned
Europeans about their stereotypes on CCP’ political system.
She called this a “Europe bias against China,"
which had damaged the image of Europe in China.
She required that Europe
“remove these useless barriers and prejudices."
Li Jianmang (political and economic affairs critic):
“Such an action [of Fu Ying] is rather witless.
If you have done things right, there is nothing to be
ashamed of. China has indeed a poor human rights record.
Why are Europeans concerned about human rights
in China? This is a question for CCP to ask itself.
What problems have you created
that have affected the whole world?”
Why are the European countries concerned
about China’s human rights situation?
Du Daobin (Scholar, writer, political critic): “Europeans
understand the history of this system [communism].
They believe that there is no future for this system,
which has its justifications.
If China marches forward in the current direction,
it will become exactly the same as the Nazis.
They both emphasize control of the masses
and pursue development at the disregard of human rights.”
In addition to politics and human rights, Fu Ying criticized
Europe’s double standard towards Chinese economy.
She said, Europe does not accept China’s political system,
yet it wants to benefit from China’s economic development.
Independent scholar Du Daobin thinks that Fu Ying mixes
deliberately the CCP, China and Chinese people’ concepts,
in order to create confusion.
Du Daobin: “Europe is currently China’s largest
trading partner, but it is anti-communist.
European countries want to be part of China’s development,
and to share the benefits with the Chinese people.
But they don’t want to cooperate with CCP’s monopolized
interests. Europe wants to cooperate with Chinese people,
not with the CCP. European countries are not wrong,
not at all!"
According to public opinions, CCP has been trying to rely
on ”commercialized foreign relations" to fetter of Europe.
It even tries to influence U.S. government through
corporations. When criticized for its human rights situation,
CCP always resorts to such terms as ”internal affairs"
or ”different situation” as an excuse.
Du Daobin: “This generation of CCP diplomats, represented
by Fu Ying and Li Zhaoxing lack necessary abilities.
They only try to protect CCP’s interests, not China. China’s
foreign diplomacy acts against China’s national interests.”
Fu Ying also mentioned Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao’s
visit to Britain in June.
British Prime Minister Cameron said to Wen that only with
improved human rights can economy maintain development.
Referring to this, Fu Ying satirizes August’ riot in London,
that Chinese are confused about British economy’ stability.
Gu Xiaojun (writer, Mainland China): “Her [Fu Ying]
subtext is clear: do not criticize us. This is inappropriate.
People have the right to talk; and others have the right
to express their opinions.
As a deputy foreign minister, she is ungracious
to show anger on such a diplomatic occasion.
She shows arrogant attitude and tries to establish
political rules by herself. The impact is very bad.”
Fu Ying recently challenged opinions in Der Spiegel
over China’s economic, military and human rights issues.
In its Chinese edition published by the Chinese Embassy
in Germany, the original text was significantly altered.
Li Jianmang: ”I still feel that such officials [as Fu Ying]
are merely performing “parrot talk,"
uttering words dictated by CCP.
Every time the same words are being repeated.
In terms of political security,
CCP is well aware of its crisis, otherwise why would it
spend so much money on maintaining social stability!?"
NTD reporters Chang Chun, Wang Ziqi and Zhang Jian
