【新唐人2015年01月20日訊】歌手姚貝娜乳腺癌復發去世後，她的家人和歌迷們還未從哀痛中醒來，《深圳晚報》記者喬裝成醫生助手偷拍遺體的消息，引發了國內就新聞倫理的口水戰。隨著事件的發展，主治醫生姚曉明涉嫌活體摘除包括法輪功學員在內的角膜的醜聞，也跟著被揭露出來。
姚貝娜16號在北京大學深圳醫院去世。第二天，《深圳晚報》刊登多篇報導，描述了姚貝娜去世，和深圳眼科醫生姚曉明實施眼角膜摘除手術的整個過程。
而在17號凌晨，知名娛樂爆料人「娛樂圈揭秘」，在微博上貼出了一名媒體人在「朋友圈」裡發表的文章。文中說，原本與眼科醫院的姚曉明醫生約好提供信息，但後來才發現姚曉明被晚報「搞定」，承諾給對方獨家。16號晚上，三名偽裝成姚曉明醫生助手的《深圳晚報》記者進入太平間偷拍。被姚家人發現後曾發生爭吵，最後由姚貝娜所屬的華誼公司老總出面，刪除了相機裡的照片。
事件引發社會上廣泛的批評聲浪。《新浪》17號發起問卷調查，截止到19號下午四點，有大約3萬5千人投票，95.9%的投票者認為這種做法違背新聞倫理。
新聞倫理的口水仗還沒有結束，主刀醫生姚曉明又被曝光，曾經被人實名舉報，在沒有充分告知風險的情況下，就對眼角膜捐獻者進行活體摘除等等。
從2003年開始，就開始在網路論壇批評姚曉明醫生的，是網絡知名公益志願者崔從政。他在多個網絡發帖表示，99年12月，在不如實告訴手術情形及後果的情況下，姚曉明以「記者都來了」等理由，「逼迫楊萍活體捐獻眼角膜」。事發後，姚曉明不善待志願者，「還篡改病歷作偽證詆譭活體捐獻眼角膜志願者。」
楊萍是中國第二例活體角膜捐獻者，她自願將失明多年的左眼眼角膜捐出，但在手術後，出現了發炎、分泌物增多，眼瞼凹陷、左臉凹入變形等症狀。她以手術之前沒有獲得知情權為由，狀告主刀醫生姚曉明，這一案件被稱為「活體捐獻第一案」。
台灣國際器官移植關懷協會副理事長黃士維：「你要在台灣，病患接受器官移植手術實際上都是健保給付，然後裡面都不能牽扯到醫生很多利益的問題。那在中國大陸它是完全利益導向的一個醫療行為。既然是利益導向，我們就發現到裡面有搶器官，然後欺騙病人捐器官等等，很多這些報導會出來。」
另外，2014年12月23號，總部設在紐約的「追查迫害法輪功國際組織」，發佈了廣東省非軍隊系統醫療機構，涉嫌活摘法輪功學員器官醫務人員的追查名單。姚曉明也在廣東省68家醫院832名醫務人員的追查名單之內。「追查國際」的通告稱，身為深圳市眼科醫院角膜及眼表病區主任醫師，角膜及眼表病區主任，眼庫執行主任，姚曉明完成角膜移植1000多例。
公益志願者崔從政還在網路曝光，所謂「深圳市眼庫」、「深圳市紅十字會眼庫」、「深圳市獅子會眼庫」也變成了姚曉明醫生的眼庫。姚曉明並要求病人捐款，還曾經威脅病人「叫公安滅掉你」，也威脅過崔從政本人。
黃士維：「最重要一件事情是，它有兩個特性。第一個特性它是完全不透明的器官移植環境，第二就是它完全是利益導向的一個器官移植環境。那裏邊就有非常非常多匪夷所思的事情發生。」
台灣精神健康基金會論壇組召集人陳彥玲：「法律沒有辦法完全規範人類的行為。那當我們把自己的生命，或是自己認定的人類存在的價值，這種良知的價值，完全放在文字的法律的時候，你肯定是會失望。」
在姚貝娜遺體事件中，姚曉明還受到指責的，是以他名字命名的「深圳市慈善會曉明眼庫基金」，聯合《深圳晚報》，以及其他基金會，在沒有得到姚貝娜家屬同意前，就在發佈姚貝娜去世消息的同時，提倡成立「姚貝娜光明基金」，還收到了兩筆捐款。在受到「華誼音樂」聲明抗議後，《深圳晚報》18號發表致歉聲明，撤回該項目倡議，並退還兩筆捐款。
採訪編輯/尚燕
Yao Beina Passed Away on Monday, Doctor Yao Xiaoming Involved in Live Organ Harvest
Mainland singer Yao Beina passed away due to a relapse
of breast cancer.
Her family and fans are still in mourning.
Her remains, which were photographed by a Shenzhen
Evening News reporter who posed as a doctor’s assistant,
triggered a war of words regarding mainland journalistic
ethics.
Following this scandal, the scandal of Yao Xiaoming’s
suspected involvement in live organ harvesting –
taking Falun Gong practitioners’ corneas – was revealed.
On Jan. 16, Yao Beina passed away at Peking University
Shenzhen Hospital.
The next day, the Shenzhen Evening News published
many reports regarding her death
and Shenzhen ophthalmologist Yao Xiaoming’s
entire cornea removal surgery.
On the early morning of the 17th, the well-known
entertainment resource “Entertainment Secret"
posted an article from a media person on its microblog.
The article said that they scheduled a time to obtain
information from Dr. Yao Xiaoming and realized
he committed to give exclusive news to the Evening News.
On the evening of the 16th, three Shenzhen Evening News
reporters disguised as Dr. Yao Xiaoming’s assistants took
photographs at the morgue.
They were found by Yao’s family and a quarrel ensued.
Finally, the owner of Huayi company, Yao Beina’s
employer, came out to delete the pictures on the camera.
The incident triggered widespread criticism.
On Jan. 17, Sina launched survey.
By 16:00 on the 19th, about 35,000 people voted.
95.9 percent of voters believe that this practice
violated journalistic ethics.
The war of words regarding journalism ethics is not over.
Yao Xiaoming is exposed to have practiced live organ
harvesting without explaining the risks to the cornea donor.
Cui Congzheng, a well-known Internet charity volunteer,
began to criticize Yao Xiaoming in 2013.
On several websites he posted that in December 1999,
Yao Xiaoming pushed Yao Ping to become a live cornea
donor without explaining the surgery consequences
using the excuse that reporters were coming.
Following that, he even distorted medical records
to slander live a cornea donor volunteer.
Yang Ping was the second living cornea donor in China.
She voluntarily donated her left cornea because
she had been blind for many years.
However, after the surgery, she had inflammation, secretions,
sunken eyelids, a concaved left cheek, and other symptoms.
She sued Dr. Yao Xiaoming because she had
a right to know the truth before the surgery.
The case was referred to as the first case of a living donor.
Taiwan International Care Association for Organ Transplant
Vice President Huang Shi-wei: “The donor will be paid
by health insurance for organ transplantation without
involving any doctor’s interest issue in Taiwan.
It’s entirely profit-driven in mainland.
We found lots of grabbing organs, cheating donors
to donate organs for profit with many reports."
In addition, on Dec. 23, 2014, International Organization
to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong, headquartered
in New York, released a list from Guangdong non-military
medical institution which is suspected to be involved
in live organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners.
Yao Xiaoming is also on the list of 832 names
from 68 hospital in Guangdong Province.
The notice said Yao Xiaoming completed more than
1,000 corneal transplantations as a Shenzhen Eye Hospital
cornea and ocular Ward MD and Executive Director
of the Eye Bank.
Cui Congzheng also exposed that the so-called
Shenzhen Eye Bank, Shenzhen Red Cross Eye Bank,
Shenzhen Lions Eye Bank all became Dr. Yao
Xiaoming’s eye banks.
Yao Xiaoming required patients to donate and threatened
patients with calling the public security to exterminate them.
He also threatened Cui Congzheng.
Huang Shiwei: “The most important thing
is that it has two features.
The first one is it’s a completely opaque organ transplant
environment.
The second is that it is a completely
profit-driven environment.
There are very many incredible things happening."
Taiwan Mental Health Foundation Forum Convenor
Chen Yanling: “the law has no way to completely
regulate human behavior.
So you will certainly be disappointed when
you put your own life, or the conscience values
such as human existence entirely in the hands of the law."
After the Yao Beina remains incident, Yao Xiaoming
was also accused of naming the Shenzhen Eye Bank
Xiaoming Charity Fund after himself.
Shenzhen Evening News and other foundations advocated
to establish the Yao Beina Bright Fund without
Yao Beina families’ consent when Yao Beina passed away.
The foundation even received two donations.
After receiving Huayi Music protest statement,
the Shenzhen Evening News apologized on the 18th
by withdrawing the project initiative
and returning the two donations.
Interview & Edit/Sang Yan
