【新唐人2013年06月29日訊】一位高調炫富的年輕女子郭美美，讓中國紅十字會的信譽及捐款一落千丈，也讓中共喉舌《新華網》、《人民網》紛紛捲入，除了連續發文「追殺」郭美美，也把矛頭對準「紅會」。在外界質疑這一事件「水太深」的同時，我們也請來了評論員，為我們分析中共高層處理郭美美案時的顧慮。
兩年前郭美美高調炫富後，導致中國紅十字在今年的蘆山「4•20」震災募捐，收到無數個「滾」字。之後，「紅十字會社會監督委員會」委員王永曾放出消息，要重新調查郭美美，但在6月9號的社監委年中會議表決時卻沒有通過。而郭美美更在微博撂下狠話：只要敢動她一根毫毛，立即公布紅十會很多不為人知的貪污內幕！
6月25號，《人民網》刊登署名評論文章表示，高調、跋扈的郭美美，能讓堂堂「紅會」及有關部門如此膽戰心驚，顯然是一只大有背景的妖怪。作者追問「紅會」何時徹查郭美美事件。
另外，27號，一篇在《新華網》發表的文章說，面對如此囂張的「叫板」，「紅會」卻依舊忍氣吞聲，選擇逃避，實在讓人費解。文章還說，重查郭美美是必須的。
大陸人士陳先生：「這個社會太黑暗了，太黑暗了，黑暗到不可想像的程度。反正一涉及到高層中的追殺，就黑道、白道攪在一塊。為甚麼郭美美敢叫板？它不敢下手，就是紅會確實忌諱太深、太多。」
早在6月12號，《新華網》論壇曾發表文章，表示﹕郭美美每次炫富都是對「中國紅會」的「耐性」進行一次試探，而「紅會的忍耐力」奇強。文章還說，看來「中國紅會」水深得不得了，而郭與紅會的關係高深莫測。
美國「南加州大學」公共政策博士葉科表示，中共高層需要對事件本身的影響，進行兩大方面的評估。與此同時，紅十字會本身的黑幕太深，這一事件若引起巨大民憤，也會對中共體製造成強力衝擊。
美國「南加州大學」公共政策博士葉科：「當局也會評估這個衝擊到底有多大，因為郭美美本身依靠的背後權力太大，比如直接達到中央最高層，先弄他們也會對中共體制造成另外一種震盪。這樣權衡起來也可能會不了了之。比如最後民怨更加憤怒的話，她讓黨或體制覺得很沒面子，那可能會決定處理郭美美，甚至她的後臺也會變成替罪羊。」
《人民網》在13號的一篇評論文章中表示，原來紅監會委員與紅十字會「是同一個利益共同體。」
16號，郭美美在澳門舉辦豪華生日派對再度炫富，網民估計花費至少數百萬元。
18號，中國法律學者徐昕發出微博說，「紅會」至今未起訴郭美美的侵權行為，但起訴時效即將到期。
前《南方人才市場報》副總編朱建國：「黨媒無非把紅會的腐敗暴露了，這是它最大的『功勞』。無非是郭美美最近又有一些炫耀的動作引發憤怒了。但是從老百姓來講，對它（黨媒的動作）不會有很大的意義。」
不過，《新華網》和《人民網》的一些文章已經陸續被刪除。
葉科：「現在黨媒只不過是反映一個聲音，它（黨媒）現在並沒有直接指到紅十字會整體機構腐爛的程度，以及背後體制的根本原因，所以它那個質疑，雖然很多人覺得它敢於說話，但事實上它還是非常表面的。」
葉科還表示，郭美美事件不是一起孤立的事件，背後反映了這個社會的不健康和體制的畸形。如果有一天郭美美從雲端摔下懸崖的時候，大家會看到她其實是這個體制的犧牲品。所以要從根本上解決問題，必須要改變現在的社會狀況和體制。
採訪/陳漢 編輯/王子琦 後製/孫寧
Guo Meimei: Anxious State-Run Media, CCP Senior Level Officials Have Two Concerns
Guo Meimei, the high-profile wealthy young lady, caused
the plummeting credability of the Red Cross in China and donations to decrease dramatically.
Due to this, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
mouth-piece media such as XinHua Net and People’s Daily,
published a series of articles to “hunt” Guo Meimei.
They’re also targeting the Red Cross.
While the world questions whether this case is too complex,
we invited commentators to analyze the concerns of CCP senior leaders.
Two years ago, Guo Meimei flaunted her wealth in a high
-profile fashion, resulting in the China Red Cross receiving
many notes with the words “get out” during its donation
collection after the April 20 Lushan earthquake this year.
Soon after, Wang Yongzeng, member of the Red Cross
Social Supervision Committee, said the Committee will re-investigate Guo Meimei.
But on June 9, the Committee didn’t vote the decision
through during its mid-year meeting.
Then Guo Meimei wrote a microblog which said that
if anyone dares to touch her, she will immediately
release details of many unknown Red Cross scandals.
On June 25, People’s Daily published a signed commentary
saying that the high-profile and domineering Guo Meimei
caused the Red Cross and related government departments
a big scare, which shows there’s skeletons in the Red Cross closet.
The writer questioned when the Red Cross
will re-investigate Guo Meimei’s case.
In addition, on June 27, Xinhua Net published an article
which said that it’s hard for people to understand why
the Red Cross kept silent and chose to avoid in the face
of such arrogant criticism.
The article also said that Guo Meimei must be re-probed.
Mr. Chen, Chinese citizen: “Chinese society
is too dark, too dark. It’s dark to an unimaginable level.
When touches a hunted down issue from the high level,
the government officials are cooperating with gangland.
Why does Guo Meimei dare to criticize?
Because the government doesn’t dare to investigate,
because the Red Cross has too many deep concerns.”
As early as June 12, Xinhua Net published an article on
its bbs stating that each time Guo Meimei flaunts her wealth
is a test of patience for the Red Cross, and the Red Cross’
endurance ability is oddly strong.
The article also said that the relationship between
Guo Meimei and Red Cross is too complex for speculation.
Ye Ke, a Public Policy Ph.D. from University of
Southern California in the United States,
said CCP senior leaders need to assess two aspects
of the impact of this event.
At the same time, the Red Cross is extremely shady.
If this event angers the people, it will cause a strong impact
on the CCP regime.
Ye Ke, a Public Policy Ph.D. from University of Southern
California: “The regime will assess the impact of this event.
Because the Guo Meimei has the highest level leaders of CCP
behind her, her power is very strong, and to deal with them may shock the CCP system.
After thinking about this, CCP senior leaders may decide
to do nothing.
If finally people are more angry, and Guo Meimei causes
the Party to lose face, then it may deal with Guo and the people beneath her as scapegoats."
People’s Daily said in a June 13 commentary that
the Red Cross Social Supervision Committee and Red Cross are, “in the same interest group.”
On June 16, Guo Meimei held a luxury birthday party
in Macao, flaunting her wealth yet again.
Netizens estimated that she spent at least several million
RMB at this event.
On June 18, Xu Xin, a China legal scholar, said in a microblog
that the Red Cross didn’t bring lawsuit against Guo Meimei, and the valid time for a lawsuit will expire soon.
Zhu Jianguo, former deputy editor of Southern Human
Resource Market: “CCP media just exposed the corruption
of Red Cross, which is the biggest achievement.
It’s nothing more than Guo Meimei continuous carrying on
that anger the people.
From people’s point view, CCP media’s actions
have no significant meaning.”
However, Xinhua Net and People’s Daily gradually deleted
their articles from their websites.
Ye Ke: “Now the CCP media merely reflects one voice.
It (party media) doesn’t point out the degree of corruption
of the Red Cross and the root reason behind the system.
It just uses something to fool people into believing
that it dares to say something.
But actually, their words are very superficial.”
Ye Ke also said that Guo Meimei’s case is not an isolated one.
It reflects the unhealthy deformity of the society
and the system.
Once Guo Meimei falls, people will see
she is also a victim of the system.
To solve the issue fundamentally, it must change
the current conditions of the society and the system.
