【新唐人2013年02月05日訊】2月4號，《鄭州晚報》公布了在河南義昌大橋事故中，10名遇難者中的6人名單，和11名傷者姓名。同時有河南媒體報導，遇難者遺體將統一火化，農村戶口的死者賠償可能比城市戶口要少一半。
河南義昌大橋事故的救援工作已經在2號晚上結束，現場指揮部說，10名遇難者的身份都得到了確認，不過目前國內媒體還只公布了其中6人的名字，傷者們正在醫院接受治療，3名重傷者已經基本脫離危險。
目前官方還沒有公布具體的賠償方案。2號上午，國家安監總局副局長王德學在視察事故現場時，曾表示「要統一標準，根據具體情況執行，千萬不要分工人、農民，生命都是一樣的。」
但是，《河南商報》4號引述一位遇難者家屬的話說，目前正進行賠償談判，政府工作人員聲稱，事故發生在河南境內要按河南的標準，「城市戶口能賠40多萬元，農村戶口的最多賠18萬元。」另有一名死難者家屬對媒體證實，工作人員曾向他確認，死去的親人是城鎮居民戶口﹖還是農村居民戶口？
同樣是事故的死難者，爲甚麽賠償金額有可能出現一半以上的差別呢？
北京律師李和平:「這是中國現在存在的一個問題，還是比較嚴重的，『同命不同價』，在好多方面都可以表現出來。哪怕是在一個車裏面，哪怕是一家人，有的人是城市戶口，有的人是農村戶口，兩個人的賠償金額都不一樣，應該是很不公正的。」
在中國的法律上，是否有農村、城市「一刀切」的賠償規定呢？
李和平：「不光是有一個農村城市的戶籍差別，還有一個人的年齡，有無需要贍養的人，和撫養的人。各個方面都是有區別的，不應該是，好比說18和40這兩個決然劃開來。中國的法律上規定也不一樣。並且它這裡面還有一個事情，和這個形成強烈對比的，就2008年楊佳那個案子。那些警察被報每個人賠了300多萬。」
另外有一名姓孫的家屬趕到澠池縣認領父親的遺體，他表示，2號和事故善後處理組談賠償後，因爲數額很少沒有接受。但3號有關部門催促他們辦理賠償，表示12點前簽字，獎勵5萬，依次類推。讓他們覺得很不公平。
大陸河南人士張先生：「這些公共事件，政府總是想儘早的抹平這些事件，防止擴大影響。它就是害怕受難者聯合起來講條件。他們採取這種手段，來瓦解這些受難者團結起來。」
2月1號9點多，連霍高速公路義昌大橋發生爆炸坍塌事故，一輛裝載爆炸品的貨車行經義昌大橋時，突然發生爆炸，導致大橋南半幅被炸毀，北半幅橋板鬆動。
2月2號晚，公安部網站發佈事故調查結果說，事故是因運輸煙花爆竹的車輛發生爆炸，引起橋面垮塌，造成車輛墜落。而有關義昌大橋的質量調查沒有進一步消息。
全長208.04米、高37.71米的義昌大橋，南半幅橋面有80多米發生坍塌，現場一片狼藉。現場發現的遇難者多數是因為墜橋身亡。
據報導，現場清理人員介紹說，共有包括6輛貨車、2輛私家轎車以及多輛嶄新的比亞迪汽車被堆放在此，像是一處廢舊汽車回收站。
在中國農曆新年前，留下這些苦澀的餘韻，成爲微博上受關注的話題。網友總結河南媒體對事故的報導後發現，事件報導共1300字，其中有1134字是表揚河南省委省政府如何辛苦工作，其中提了16位領導，卻沒有出現一次傷亡人員或家屬的名字。
採訪/陳漢 編輯/尚燕 後製/君卓
Values of Lives in China
On February 4th, the Zhengzhou Evening News published
the Yichang Bridge accident in Henan and the list of the 16 victims, six dead and 11 injured.
Henan media reported that the six deceased victims
would be cremated.
Compensation for the deceased from a rural household
may be only half of that than from a city household.
The rescue work for Henan Yichang Bridge accident
ended on the evening of February 2nd.
The onsite-commanding Ministry said the identities
of the 10 deaths have been confirmed, however, so far only 6 names have been published.
The 11 injured persons are in the hospital for treatment,
but three of them are in stable condition.
Officials have not disclosed the specific compensation
scheme.
On the morning of February 2nd, Wang Dexue,
deputy director of the State Administration of Work Safety, inspected the scene of the accident.
He said life is equal and uniform standards will apply,
according to specific circumstances, with no division of farmers or laborers.
However, on February 4th, the Henan Business Daily quoted
a victim’s family negotiating for compensation.
The government staff claimed since the accident occurred
in Henan Province, compensation should follow Henan’s standards.
That means victims from a city household can receive
over 400,000 yuan, but from a rural household can receive at most 180,000 yuan.
Another victim’s family told the media that he
was questioned by a staff member whether the deceased relative was an urban resident or rural resident.
For victims of the same accident, why should
the amount of compensation be so different?
Beijing lawyer Li Heping: “This is a problem
and it is quite serious.
The values of lives can be manifested in many ways,
even if it is in the same car and from a same household.
One belongs to a rural household, and another belongs
to a city household.
The amount of compensation for these two people
will be different. It’s indeed very unfair.”
Is there a provision in China’s law governing
compensation for rural and urban residents?
Li Heping, “Not only is there a rural and city difference,
but also a person’s age, and with dependent(s) as well as other conditions.
It’s not fair to compensate one 180,000 and the other 400,000.
There was a stark contrast in the Yang Jia incident in 2008.
Every police who lost his life was compensated
for more than 3 million yuan.
http://news.ifeng.com/mainland/special/yichangdaqiao/content-3/detail_2013_02/04/21908695_1.shtml
When Mr. Sun arrived at Mianchi County to claim
the remains of his father, he did not want to accept the official offer for compensation.
A day later, officials urged him to settle and offered 50,000
more if he signed an agreement before noon.
Relatives of the victim’s family feel
they have been treated unfairly.
Mr. Zhang from Henan: “The government is always trying
to smooth these public events as soon as possible to prevent further expansion of the impact.
Officials are afraid of the victims’ group power
in negotiating compensation.
Therefore, they take this means to break the victims’ unity.
On a.m February 1st, Yichang Bridge
on Lianhuo Highway collapsed after a sudden explosion.
When a truck containing explosives passed Yichang Bridge,
the southern half of the Yichang Bridge exploded and the northern half was loosened.
On the evening of February 2nd, the Ministry of Public
Security website released the results of the investigation,
which said the accident was due to fireworks exploding
in a transporting truck which caused the bridge to collapse.
No further news has been released about the quality
of the Yichang Bridge.
The Yichang Bridge was 208.04 meters long and
37.71 meters high. The accident site was a total mess.
Most of the fatalities was due to falling off
the collapsed bridge.
According to reports, on-site clean-up personnel
said a total of six trucks, two private cars and
many brand new cars, such as Audi,
were stacked up like a scrap metal junkyard.
This tragedy, which occurred before the Chinese Lunar
New Year, has become a hot topic for the microbloggers.
Some netizens said from the media’s 1300 word coverage
of the accident, 1134 words praised the hard work and effort of officials, including 16 leaders.
However, not even one name of the victims or families
was mentioned.
