【禁聞】三天一頓打 「狼式」教育受質疑

【新唐人2011年11月18日訊】一支雞毛撢就能解決教育問題嗎﹖廣東省一位被稱為「狼爸」的父親,對他4名子女嚴厲教育,其中3個孩子考進北大。最近他拿著一個雞毛撣,去參加某電視臺的辯論,他說,「打」是家庭教育不可缺失的部分,雞毛撣就是他教育孩子的秘密武器。不過,有人認為這是「奴性教育」,也有學者表示,中共謊言與暴力的黨文化,才是中國大陸教育的問題所在。

「三天一頓打,孩子進北大」是「狼爸」蕭百佑的口號。在《江蘇教育電視臺》節目中,47歲的蕭百佑手上拿著一支雞毛撢,據說,這是他教育孩子的秘密武器。

蕭百佑接受《蘋果日報》採訪時解釋說,這不是簡單體罰,不是亂打,而是要讓孩子明白家規。不過,蕭百佑的家規不少,諸如,坐不好,打;拿筆姿勢不對,打;功課背誦不流利;與小朋友爭吵;被老師批評;放學不準時;未經同意看電視;考試粗心大意被扣分;書本、作業本不整潔;丟失文具、衣物…等等,都要挨頓打。

打完後,還要孩子發表受罰後的決心。

蕭百佑表示,自己也是在母親「打」的教育環境下長大的。他認為,當初他以廣東省第8名的成績考進暨南大學,要歸因於母親的教育方式,所以他選擇延續「家族傳統」,也因此他被封上「狼爸」的稱號。

儘管蕭百佑在臺上說得頭頭是道,但現場觀眾並不怎麼認可,對「狼爸」提出許多質疑。南京師範大學副教授朱強也向媒體指出,「狼爸」根本是在倡導「奴性教育」。

原首都師範大學教育科學學院副教授李元華也對《新唐人》表示,「狼爸」這種「打」的教育反映了他成長的背景,如果一支雞毛撢就能解決教育問題,那也就不是教育了。

李元華:「其實我是覺得他這種教育,整體上這種精神傳遞的就像中共,這種﹙對﹚中國百姓的統治或者是控制是一樣的,是讓人懼怕。我用一些謊言,如果我解決不了問題的時候,我就用暴力,那麼其實他骨子裡是一種暴力的精神,而不是一種愛的精神。」

浙江大學退休教授夏瑰琦認為,現代的教育確實比較放任,沒有家規,孩子容易在外面闖禍,但並不是一支雞毛撢子就能把孩子打好。她認為,中國大陸教育的根本問題還是在於中共製造的黨文化。

夏瑰琦:「在中國大陸很多黨文化的東西,如果你用那些東西去教育孩子,那麼不管你用甚麼方法,你教育出來都不好,就是看你是用甚麼樣一個正確價值觀去教育,這是教育當中最根本的問題。」

夏瑰琦強調,教育的根本目地是要培養孩子健全的人格。在教育方法上也要因材施教,對於不太容易規範的孩子是要嚴格些,但適時的鼓勵也很重要。

新唐人記者周玉林、李庭、薛莉採訪報導。

Child Abuse on family Education has been Questioned

Can a stick warning solve the education problem?
In Guangdong, one is called “Wolf Father” is strict on
his four children, three of his children study in
Beijing University.
Recently “Wolf Father” holds a feather stick attends a TV debate,
He said beating children to let them study is part of the education.
The feather stick is his secret weapon for child』s education.
However, some people consider this as a slavery education,
scholars said the Chinese Communist Party』s (CCP) party culture,
lies and violence, is the problem of education in China.

“Kids going to Beijing University if beating them
every three days" is a saying of the “Wolf father" Xiao Baiyou.
In an education TV program in Jiangsu, in China,
A 47-year old Baiyou Xiao is holding a feather stick in his hand,
which is his own “secret weapon" for handling his kids.

Mr. Xiao explained to “Apple Daily" during the interview:
“It is not simply a body-punishment, not violent action,
but to let the kids know the family-discipline.
There are many rule in his Family-discipline,
the causes for being beaten are various, for examples:
the posture of holding pen is not proper;
infrequent-reading, arguing with classmates;
getting criticized by teachers, off school not in time;
watching TV without permission,
getting lower score of exams by careless,
being untidy with textbooks and homework,
losing stationary and cloths so and so.

The kids must show their acknowledgement
and say “no-again” after being beaten.

Xiao Baiyou said his mother beat him during his youth.

He believes that his mother』s educational method
helped him to enter Jinan University with the eight best score in Guangdong Province.
Later, he chose to make it a “family tradition,”
in order to educate his kids, therefore he was called, “wolf dad.”

Although Xiao spoke clearly and logically on stage,
the audience didn』t agree with him and raised many questions.
Zhu Qiang, associate professor of Nanjing Normal University,
told Chinese media that “wolf dad” is advocating “slavery education.”

Li Yuanhua, former associate professor of
Education Science at the Capital Normal University,
told NTD TV that “wolf dad』s” beating method
reflects how he was raised as a youth.
If a feather stick can solve China』s education woes;
it can』t be named “education.”

Li Yuanhua: “In fact, this kind of education is similar to
the CCP』s controlling Chinese people, it is scary.
The CCP uses lies and violence if they cannot solve a problem.
In fact, they have a violent mind-set, rather than a spirit of love."

Xia GuiQi, a retired professor at Zhejiang University, said
that the present educational methods take a laissez-faire approach.
There are no rules, so kids are apt to cause trouble.
They cannot behave themselves well even if spanked.
She thought that the fundamental problem of education
in China is the party』s culture.

Xia GuiQi: “In mainland China, there are many party cultures.
If you use these cultures to educate your children,
no matter what methods you use,
you will be unable to teach them well.
It depends on the value parents put on education.
This is the most fundamental issue."

Xia Guiqi stressed that the fundamental purpose of education
is to train children to have a healthy personality.
Methods in education should be individualized for the child.

It should be stricter with difficult children,
but it is also very important to encourage them.

NTD reporters Zhou Yulin, Li Ting and Xue Li

相關文章
評論
新版即將上線。評論功能暫時關閉。請見諒!