【新唐人2014年11月07日讯】中共外交官用习近平专机走私象牙
总部设在英国的非政府组织——“环境调查局 （Environmental investigation agency）”，11月6号公布的一份调查报告说，中共驻坦桑尼亚大使馆的外交官，是该国盗猎象牙走私的买家之一。
“环境调查局”说，他们的调查员从非法象牙供应商口中得知，一些中共大使馆的官员，至少从2006年起，就开始大批购买盗猎的象牙。
报告说，在2013年中共国家主席习近平访问坦桑尼亚期间，中共外交官员就非法购买了数千公斤象牙，并将象牙藏在习近平专机上的外交邮袋中，偷运回中国。
据《法新社》报导，中共外交部发言人在11月6号的例行记者会上指责相关报告毫无根据。
香港警察与示威者再度发生冲突
香港民众争民主普选的“占领行动”，11月6号已经进入第40天，平静了一段的金钟和旺角占领区，当天再次发生警民冲突。
据《自由亚洲电台》报导，5号深夜，在旺角，警方一度施放胡椒喷雾，驱逐示威人士，有抗议者投诉被打伤。而在金钟，当晚也有一批戴着“V煞”面具的示威者游行，期间，与警察发生冲突。
报导说，旺角和金钟两地，最少有三人在冲突中被捕，多人受伤。
网民：占中和APEC哪个更扰民
亚太经合组织峰会（APEC）正在北京召开，北京当局为了这个会议，命令学校停课、工厂停工、车辆限行、牛奶停送，扰民动作之大，让海外媒体都讥笑不已。
而香港的“占中”行动，也一直被所谓的“反占中”人士，以影响市民正常生活为由，加以反对。
11月6号，有大陆网民在网上讨论，是香港大学生占中扰民还是北京APEC更扰民？哪个更应该反对？
有网友发帖质问说，反占中人士指责占中影响交通？影响商铺？影响普通人上班生计？因此要反占中。那好，APEC影响北京市民更甚，那APEC反不反？该怎么反？还有中共的那些“两会”、“全会”都很扰民，要不要反？
编辑/周玉林
Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Diplomat Smuggled
Illegal Ivory onto Xi Jinping’s Plane
Headquartered in the UK, Non-Governmental organization,
Environmental Investigation Agency published a survey on
November 6th claiming that:
the CCP diplomat in Tanzania is one buyer of illegal ivory,
smuggling from poaching.
Environmental Investigation Agency quoted what the illegal
ivory suppliers admitted that lots of Chinese Embassy officials
began to purchase a large amount of poached ivory since 2006.
The horrifying report said that Chinese Foreign officials illegally purchased thousands of kilograms of poached ivory and smuggled
it back to China in a diplomatic bag on Xi Jinping’s plane.
This is reported to have taken place during 2013 Chinese
President Xi Jinping’s trip in Tanzania.
According to the Agence France-Presse report, the Chinese
Foreign Ministry spokesman accused the related reports of being
baseless, at their regular press conference on November 6th.
The Conflict Between Hong Kong Police and Demonstrators
Recurred
It has been 40 days since the Hong Kong universal suffrage
occupation movement begun.
The clash between police and protesters occurred again in
Admiralty and Mong Kok after a few days of calm.
According to Radio Free Asia report, on the 5th night, the police
even used pepper spray to disperse protesters in Mong Kok. The
protesters were injured.
In the Admiralty, a number of marchers in V evil masks clashed
with police.
The report said that there were at least three arrests in the conflict
in Mong Kok and Admiralty, many were injured.
Netizens: What is More Disturbing, Occupy Central or
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)?
The Beijing authorities ordered the suspension of school classes,
the shut down of factories, vehicle access curtailed, milk delivery
stopped all for the APEC Summit in Beijing.
These big disruptions made foreign Media mock incessantly.
The Hong Kong Occupy Central movement was opposed by the
so-called “Anti-Occupy Central" people with the pathetic
excuse of the disruption to normal life.
November 6, mainland netizens discussed online about which
one is more disturbing, Hong Kong University Students’
Occupy Central or APEC?
Some netizens questioned the sincerity of the Anti-Occupy Central people whom accuse Occupy Central of disrupting shops and ordinary
working people. That’s supposedly why they wanted to anti Occupy Central.
However, APEC is imposing and disrupting Beijing people on an
even wider scale.
Should we be against APEC?
The CCP’s two sessions and plenary also disturb people, should
we protest against that?
Edit/Zhou Yulin
