【新唐人2014年10月18日讯】澳洲传媒日前继续披露有关香港特首梁振英，与澳洲企业UGL签订巨额酬金协议的进一步细节，指称梁振英当时除了要求约5000万港元的秘密报酬之外，还向UGL额外索要近3740万港元，但遭到拒绝。美国《华尔街日报》则刊文，描述了梁振英其人的独裁本质。
澳洲传媒Fairfax Media旗下的《悉尼晨锋报》，8号报导了梁振英于2011年竞选期间，签下秘密协议，收受澳洲企业UGL集团约5000万港元的秘密报酬。
14号，《悉尼晨锋报》跟进报导，披露在UGL与梁振英签订秘密协议的同一日，戴德梁行董事局否决了一个来自中国国企天新的收购建议。该收购方案作价比UGL高出超过12亿港元。
仅隔一天，《悉尼晨锋报》15号再度报导，指称梁振英当时除了要求UGL提供约5000万港元的酬金和花红之外，再额外发放300万英镑（即接近3740万港元），作为戴德梁行日本分公司过去5年亏损的补偿，不过最终遭到UGL拒绝。
报导还引述当年参与谈判的人士表示，梁振英当时经常不回复电邮或电话，要由时任戴德梁行主席Tim Melville-Ross或债权人、苏格兰皇家银行派人寻找梁振英。
这是在短短8天内，梁振英涉嫌收受巨额贪腐被爆出的第三波内幕。这也是有关梁振英个人信用遭受沉重打击的最新案例。
香港立法会议员单仲偕：“事情已经太清楚了，已经有足够的理由进行弹劾。如果香港是一个完全民主的社会，我估计梁振英已经要辞职了。他的指控已经很清楚，他有贪腐的问题。”
时事评论员唐靖远观察认为，中共高层现在可能已经在有步骤的，开始为撤掉梁振英做准备。
时事评论员唐靖远：“现在为什么陆陆续续的放这个料呢？可能是希望梁振英能够知趣，他自己能够自动辞职。这样对他个人，对中共所谓的脸面，包括对整个香港的局势，都是有好处的。但是如果梁振英他执意要自己这么硬撑下去，那他很难避免最糟糕的一种结果，就是可能被卷入贪腐调查中去，最后锒铛入狱。”
此外，香港“占领中环”行动持续接近3个星期，梁振英宣布因安全问题，推迟原定于本周四到立法会的答问会。
社会民主连线主席“长毛”梁国雄认为，此前龙和道的驱散行动，证明警方有足够警力应付，梁振英到立法会不存在人身安全问题，他的说法是“撒谎”，是害怕接受问责。
单仲偕：“因为他避无可避。过去两个星期他已经完全避过了对他的追问。他不会见记者，不回答记者关于他贪腐的案件。如果他来到立法会，也不能完全不答，我估计他是争取时间，好好处理他个人的问题，他贪腐的问题。”
14号，《华尔街日报》社论版主编Hugo Restall撰写评论说，香港抗议跟梁振英的政治“大陆化”关系密切。在1979年，梁振英年仅24岁的时候，就已经带团访问深圳，并提供土地勘探和管理专业知识。随后，梁振英迅速攀升官阶。
文章描述，梁振英是共产党的效忠者，他也要求其他人这样，以至于他的左派同僚也讨厌他。因此，香港抗议者相信梁振英将不会改变，也不会代表香港利益。这就是为什么要解决香港的危机，梁振英就必须辞职。
唐靖远：“每次每当局势有所缓和的时候，他就会做出一些举动来刺激整个局势又升温。这个已经反复好几次了。实质上他是江派在香港台前的一个代表人物，所以他是认为他是有后台的，所以他也必须要按照江派意图来掌控整个事情。所以他不可能就这么自动的去辞职。”
《华尔街日报》的文章也提到，目前梁振英仍然继续倡导香港融入大陆。中联办已经明目张胆的干涉香港本地政治，形成第二政府。
采访/朱智善 编辑/王子琦
Corruption Allegation’s Third Wave, Foreign Media Comment On Leung Chun-Ying’s Dictatorship
Australian media recently had revealed further details of Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-Ying signing a huge payment agreement with the Australian company UGL. Reports said, in addition to Leung Chun-Ying’s requirement of a secret remuneration of approximately $HK 50 million ($US 6.4 million), he also demanded nearly $HK 37.4 million ($US 4.8 million) from UGL, but was rejected. US Wall Street Journal has published an article describing the authoritarian nature of Leung Chun-Ying.
Australian media Fairfax Media’s, Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) reported on the 8th that Leung Chun-Ying has signed a secret agreement during the 2011 election campaign, accepting a secret payment of approximately HK $ 50 million from UGL.
On the 14th, SMH further reported, on the same day of UGL signing the secret agreement with Leung Chun-ying, DTZ board of directors rejected a new acquisition offer from the Chinese state-owned Tian Xin. That acquisition offer is priced at $HK 120 million ($US 15.4 million) more than UGL.
The next day, SMH reported again, in addition to the HK $ 50 million payment, Leung had asked another £ 3 million (about HK $37.4 million) from UGL as a compensation for DTZ Japan branch’s losses over the past five years. However, this was rejected by UGL.
The report also cited words from participants in the negotiations at that time, stated that Leung Chun-Ying often did not reply to e-mails or telephone. Current chairman of DTZ Tim Melville-Ross, or creditor, the Royal Bank of Scotland has sent people to look for Leung Chun-Ying at that time.
This is the third wave of inside stories of Leung Chun-Ying’s huge corruption allegations in just eight days. This is also the latest case about Leung Chun-Ying with his personal credit suffering a heavy blow.
Member of Hong Kong Legislative Council, Sin Chung-kai: This thing is very clear; there are enough reasons to impeach. If Hong Kong is a fully democratic society, I think Leung Chun-ying has to resign. His allegations have been very clear that he has a corruption problem.
Affairs commentator Tang Jingyuan felt, the top level may now have to gradually start preparing for removing Leung.
Tang Jingyuan: Why is this thing being exposed now? Maybe in the hope that Leung Chun-Ying can get the message and voluntarily resigns. This is good for himself, the CCPs so-called face, as well as the whole situation of Hong Kong. However, if Leung Chun-Ying insists to hang on, then it is difficult for him to avoid the worst result, that is being investigated on corruption charges and ending up in jail.
In addition, Hong Kong’s “Occupy Central" has lasted nearly three weeks, Leung Chun-Ying announced to postpone the Q & A Session at the Legislative Council originally scheduled on Thursday due to security issues.
Chairman of League of Social Democrats, “Longhair" Leung Kwok-Hung felt, previous dispersive actions on Lung Wo Road proved police have enough police force to cope. There is no personal safety issues for Leung Chun-Ying to go to the Legislative Council, and his excuse is lying and afraid of being questioned.
Sin Chung-kai: He cannot avoid it. For the last two weeks he has completely evaded questioning about him, he did not see reporters or answer reporters about his corruption case.If he comes to the Legislative Council, he has to answer, I think he wants to gain time to deal with his personal problems, his corruption problem.
On the 14th, Wall Street Journal editorial page’s editor Hugo Restall commented that Hong Kong’s protest was mainly due to Leung Chun-Ying’s political “mainlandization". In 1979, when Leung Chun-Ying was just 24, he had led a group visiting Shenzhen, and provide land exploration and management expertise. His official rank has been rapidly rising since then.
The article describes, Leung Chun-Ying as a loyalist of the Communist Party, and he also asks other people to do so, that caused even his left-wing colleagues to hate him. Hence, Hong Kong protesters believe Leung Chun-Ying will not change, or think about the interests of Hong Kong. This is why Leung Chun-Ying has to resign in order to solve Hong Kong’s crisis.
Tang Jingyuan: Whenever the situation has eased, he would do something that caused the whole situation to tense up, this has been repeated several times. In fact, he is a representative of Jiang Zemin’s faction in Hong Kong, so he thinks he has some background, so he will control the whole thing according to the intent of Jiang Zemin’s faction. Therefore, there is no way for him to resign voluntarily.
The Wall Street Journal’s article also mentioned, Leung Chun-Ying is still advocating Hong Kong to be integrated into mainland. The Liaison Office has been blatantly interfered in Hong Kong’s local politics, and become a second government.
Interview/Zhu Zhishan Edit/Wang Ziqi
