【新唐人2014年06月11日讯】中国大陆演员黄海波，因为嫖娼，在被拘留15天之后，又被转送“收容教育”六个月，这引起了40多名法学界专家学者以及律师的关注，他
们在6月7号联署〝致人大常委会建议书〞，呼吁〝废止收容教育制度
包括法学泰斗江平、应松年、樊崇义、陈光中等在内的40余多位法学界专家、学者以及律师，6月7日号联署“致人大常委会建议书”，呼吁“废止收容教育制度”。
中国大陆的“收容教育”，是1991年在《全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于严禁卖淫嫖娼的决定》中所提出，具体安排则由1993年国务院颁布的《卖淫嫖娼人员收容教育办法》确立。
原“全国人大常委会法工委研究室”副主任郭道晖，6月9日号对《新唐人》表示，从法学角度和法治的角度来看，“收容教育”的做法是不对的，它跟“劳动教养”一样，都是越权立法，也并且由公安机关一家说了算，都是侵犯人权的。
原全国人大常委法工委研究室副主任郭道晖：“要限制人身自由必须是通过法院。不能由公安机关一家说了算。而且这个法规也不是依据立法法的程序来制定的。要限制人身自由的法律或法规，必须是先由法律来制定，而不是由法规，而现在它是个法规。所以它是越权立法。劳动教养既然已经废除了，同理同一个法律必须同时废除。”
北京“京都律师事务所”创始合伙人、名誉主任，全国律协刑事专业委员会主任田文昌律师，6月9日号也向《新唐人》表示，“收容教育”制度跟“劳动教养”制度性质很相似。
北京京都律师事务所创始合伙人田文昌：“劳动教养已经废除了，这个制度没有废除，应该就是一个疏漏。而且它的处罚原则是有问题的，没有经过司法程序，你最根本的问题，没有经过正当司法程序就限制人的自由，这是有悖于立法原则和立法精神的。”
原“中国政法大学”校长江平表示，“收容教育制度”违反时代潮流。
原中国政法大学校长江平：“因为这个制度已经不合时宜了。”
田文昌表示，“收容教育制度”目前使用不太多，几乎被人们遗忘记了，法学界也没有太重视这件事情。而黄海波被送“收容教育”的事情，好像重新引起了大家的关注。
在中国大陆，收容遣送、劳动教养和收容教育，被认为是法外的“三大恶法”，公安可以未经审判，便限制公民的人身自由，从6个月到2年或3年。
2003年，大学毕业生孙志刚，在广州收容所被打死事件，引发社会舆论上对“收容遣送制度”的大讨论。许志永、滕彪和俞江3位法学博士，以及贺卫方、盛洪、萧瀚等5位著名大陆法学家，先后上书“人大”，要求对“收容遣送制度”进行违宪审查。同年6月，政府正式废除“收容遣送制度”。
田文昌表示，除了上述的“三大恶法”之外，他记得还有一个“少年教养”的法规有待清理。
田文昌：“所以我们提出来应当对所有这些制度做一个清理。这样才比较好。凡是不符合立法精神和立法法原则的问题，都应该把它清理掉。”
今年5月4号，包括原全国人大常委会法工委研究室副主任郭道晖、和“北大法学院”教授张千帆在内的一百多位学者、律师和女权工作者等，已经联合致函人大常委会，要求废止“收容教育”。
有大陆媒体表示，孙志刚以生命代价让“收容遣送制度”废除了，而由“上访妈妈唐慧”的控告，让“劳教制度”废除了，期待黄海波案，能成为一个撬动“收容教育制度”终结的杠杆。
令人忧虑的是，虽然中共当局已经从法律上废除“劳动教养”和“收容遣送”两大恶法，但是中共警察仍然使用“洗脑班”和“黑监狱”等非法手段，囚禁“法轮功”信仰者和访民。郭道晖指出，未经法院审判而限制人身自由，都是侵犯人权，都属是违法的，应该废除的。
采访编辑/秦雪 后制/郭敬
Experts Call For Abolition of Detention for Re-Education
Detention for Re-Education is a new regulation, similar to Re-Education through Labor. It has recently caused legal experts concern as Chinese actor Huang Haibo was thus recently sentenced after a 15-day detention for prostitution. More than 40 Chinese legal experts, signed a joint statement to the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPC) demanding an end to Detention for Re-Education.
More than 40 legal professionals sent a joint proposal to the NPC on June 7. Included are leading Chinese experts Jiang Ping, Ying Songnian, Fan Chongyi and Chen Guangzhong. In the proposal, they call for the ending of the system.
This system was proposed in a crackdown on prostitution. It was promulgated in 1993 by the State Council.
Former NPC Legislative Affairs Commission Deputy Director Guo Daohui says the 1993 system like Re-Education through Labor is ultra vires i.e. outside the power of the courts. They are both violations of human rights, said Guo Daohui in an interview with NTD on June 9.
Guo Daohui: “To restrict personal freedom, it must be through the courts. It can not be decided by a public security organ. This regulation did not go through the procedure based on the Law on Legislation. Any law or act to restrict personal freedom must be preceded by law, not the regulation. But now this Re-Education was formulated by regulation. Therefore, it is ultra vires. Since Re-Education through Labor has been abolished, this Detention for Re-Education must be repealed as well."
Tian Wenchang head of Criminal Law Committee of All China Lawyers, says that both systems are similar.
Tian Wenchang: “Re-Education through Labor has been abolished. It is a loophole to continue Detention for Re-Education. Besides, there is a fundamental mistake in this regulation. It allows restriction of personal freedom without due process It violates both the principle and spirit of legislation."
Jiang Ping, former president China University of Political Science and Law, indicates the regulation is against the trend.
Jiang Ping: “Detention for Re-Education is outdated."
Tian Wenchang suggests the system is all but forgotten. It is Huang Haibo’s case that reminded everyone, of the existence of the regulation.
In China, Custody and Repatriation, Re-Education through Labor and Detention for Re-Education, are considered draconian and outside the law. It allows the police to detain civilians without trial for six months to two or three years.
In 2003, college graduate Sun Zhigang, was beaten to death in Guangzhou shelters. The Custody and Repatriation system was thus criticized. Legal experts such as Xu Zhiyong and Teng Biao called for a review of “Custody and Repatriation”, which was abolished in 2013.
Tian Wenchang mentions the Juvenile Reform Schools that also need to be abolished.
Tian Wenchang: “We propose a clean-up of all these. Anything that does not meet the spirit and principles of the Law on Legislation should be cleaned up."
On May 4, more than 100 academics, lawyers and women’s rights workers, jointly addressed the NPC requesting repeal of the Detention for Re-Education system.
Sun Zhigang lost his life to end Custody and Repatriation. Petitioner Tang Hui the abolition of Re-Education through Labor.Maybe Huang Haibo’s case will be the lever to break Detention for Re-Education, Chinese media suggest.
But the ending of these draconian measures has not prevented the police from continuing illegal detention to brainwashing centers and black jails. Numbers of innocent petitioners and Falun Gong practitioners are still subject to random illegal detention. Guo Daohui repeats, restriction of personal freedom without trial, is a violation of human rights and illegal. It ought to be repealed.
Interview & Edit/QinXue Post-Production/GuoJing
