【新唐人2014年04月17日讯】近年来，内地很多民众在有冤无处诉的情况下，由于上访等正常手段逐渐失效，转而创造出一套“创意维权”的模式，来给当局制造舆论压力。曾经策划八十岁老太太状告民政部的李学惠告诉本台记者，他们就是要通过制造种种噱头，吸引媒体关注，让中共在他们搭建的平台上做丑陋的表演，暴露这个体制的邪恶。
北京维权人士李学惠就是“创意维权”的推动者。他自己是拆迁上访户，但是为吸引媒体关注，常常想出一些点子。他曾经在2010年12月9号，在天安门广场国旗西侧抛撒冥币，而被北京西城区公安局刑事拘留，还被判劳教一年。
2012年年初，82岁的王秀英老太太，在向财政部申请公开中共政府援助北韩的信息被拒后，老太太又向法院递交诉状。
为了房屋拆迁纠纷，王秀英在77岁那年被判过一年劳教。
80多岁老太太状告财政部，一下子成了中国内外众多媒体关注的焦点。而这件事幕后的策划人就是李学惠。李学惠告诉媒体，他这样做的目地只有一个：保持公众对他们的关注度。
李学惠4月14号接受《新唐人》采访时表示，他们曾经相信这个体制，老老实实的走司法程序和信访程序，但是最后发现，这个体制一丁点都不值得人们相信。他们搞创意维权，就是要让更多人认识中共体制的邪恶。
北京维权人士李学惠：“我们所创意的起诉，国家财政部那个援助北韩信息的，我并不是要得到援助北韩的具体数额，我只是要让更多人认识到这个社会的黑暗，这种体制的邪恶，在这个体制中，我认为95%的欺骗，5%的暴力。所以呢，我们只是通过这个，让更多人报导。让它知道畏惧我们，解决我们的诉求，就这个目地。”
李学惠表示，原先他们只停留在解决个人诉求上面，现在他们变成以揭露社会黑暗和揭示这个体制邪恶的方式上访了。
李学惠：“当然选择援助北韩这个，是敏感的。我认为财政部不会给我们答复，司法不会给我们得到公正，那我们更看见，通过司法的不公正，咱们认识到政治的不诚信。我们是国家的主人，政府告诉我们，我们是国家的主人，也是政府的主人，政府花了钱不告诉我们，这不是政治的不诚信吗？正是这个事表明，这个政权的建立的合法性，让更多人质疑它。”
李学惠透露，下一步他们还打算制造更多的噱头，跟当局死磕。
王秀英已经向国家统计局提出政府信息公开申请，要求当局公布最近中国贫困人口的标准是多少？贫困人口有多少？而统计局拒绝回答。
李学惠：“所以我们可以打行政复议，我们可以到监察部控告它。我们并不相信司法，我们也不相信行政答复。我们只是搭建一个平台，让更多的角色在我们的平台上做丑恶的表演，把真真正正体制矛盾暴露在我们平台上。如果只是讲原先拆我们房子，给多少钱，已经不足以反映这个体制的矛盾了。”
据香港《明报》报导，全中国各种“创意维权”风起云涌。如：2008年底，湖南曾发生“彭老爹邀法官决斗”事件。和2009年6月，广西桂林阳朔县，某大酒店员工集体拜包公、狄仁杰和现代法官塑像。这家酒店负责人自称，在投资中被当地政府欺骗，希望以此方式申诉。以及2011年4月，在河南信阳市光山县，一名七旬老妇在土地庙里供奉县长相片，跪求县长帮助讨医疗费。另有2010年10月，60多名农民工遭欠薪675万元，聚集黄河岸边点香，跪拜河神，祈求讨薪成功。
李学惠表示，已经有政府人员来找他，表示会将他的拆迁赔偿诉求向上反映。他说，自己在为全国众多访民趟出一条别出心裁的上访道路。他又说，真正的上访，就是让更多人不相信这个体制。
采访编辑/秦雪 后制/钟元
———–
Petitioners “Creative Human Rights Defense” Exposes the Ugliness of the CCP
In recent years, with nowhere to appeal for justice and the abject failure of the normal process of petitions, Chinese people have figured out a series of “Creative Human Rights Defense” means of putting pressure on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) authorities. Li Xuehui, who planned to have an 80-year old woman sue the Ministry of Civil Affairs,told NTD reporter that they want to use these ways to attract attention from the media. They built a platform to have the CCP showcase its evilness.
Beijing human rights defender Li Xuehui is the promoter of “Creative Human Rights Defense.” He is a petitioner himself for forced demolition and relocation. To attract media attention, he figured out some ideas. On December 9 2010, he tossed around “money for the dead” on the west side of the CCP flag on Tianammen Square. He was detained by the Beijing Xicheng Pubic Security and sentenced for one-year labor education.
In early 2012, 82-year-old woman Wang Xiuying submitted a criminal complaint to the court after her petition to the Ministry of Finance to publish the financial assistance to North Korea was rejected. Wang Xiuying was sentenced to one year labor education when she was 77-years old due to disputes about house demolition.
An 80-year-old woman sues the Ministry of Finance suddenly becomes the focus of many domestic and foreign media. The mastermind behind it is Li Xuehui. Li Xuehui told the media that he only had one objective: to have public attention
During his interview with NTD on April 14, Li Xuehui said that he believed in the CCP system before and honestly took the path of petition and the judicial process. He finally found out there is nothing in this system to believe. They engage in creative ways to let more people know about the evil CCP regime.
Li Xuehui: “We sued the Ministry of Finance not to ask for the information on financial aid to North Korea. I just want more people to recognize the darkness of this society and the evilness of this system. I think 95% of the system is deception; the other 5% violence. We let more people report the news so the CCP is afraid of the people and resolve our issues. This is our goal."
Li Xuehui said they started with personal demands. Now they changed to petitions to expose the darkness of the society and the evilness of the system.
Li Xuehui: “The aid to North Korea is a sensitive topic. I do not think the Ministry of Finance will respond. We know the injustice of the judicial system and the lack of credibility of the political system. The government tells us we are the masters of the country. The government does not tell us how much money it spends. Isn’t this a lack of credibility? We want to show this and let more people know the regime is not legal.”
Li Xuehui revealed that they plan to make more news against the government.
Wang Xiuying has publicly requested the State Bureau of Statistics to reveal China’s recent standard of poverty and the number of people living in poverty. The Bureau refused to answer.
Li Xuehui: “We can fight for administrative reconsideration. We can go to the Ministry of Supervision to sue them. We do not believe in the judiciary system, nor do we believe in their reply. We just want to build a platform, so that more roles can play on our platform. We want to truly expose the evil system on our platform. Just talking about demolition and money cannot reflect the conflicts of this system any more.”
According to HK’s Ming Pao Daily, a variety of “creative ways to defend rights" is happening across China. The “Daddy Peng Invited the Judge for A Duel" event
happened in Hunan Province at the end of 2008. In June 2009, staff of a large hotel collectively worshiped statues of righteous officials in Chinese history, together with one statue of the current judge. The person in charge of the hotel claimed that his investments were defrauded by local government and he was appealing. In April 2011, an old woman in her 70s from Guangshan County of Xinyang City Henan Province worshipped the photo of the country official in a temple. She kneeled and begged for help with her medical expenses. In October 2010, more than 60 migrant workers gathered on the shore of the Yellow River to pray for their wages of 6.75 million yuan to be paid. They bowed to the river god and eventually were paid.
Li Xuehui said some government officials have come to him and told him they would escalated to higher levels his appeal for the demolition compensation. He said he was walking a path for numerous petitioners across the country. He added that the official petition shows that more people have no belief in this system.
