【新唐人2014年03月13日讯】大陆《财新网》3月11号上午刊登独家报导，宣称参与昆明火车站血案的8名歹徒中，有3人在事件发生之前的2月27号，已经在云南红河州个旧市沙甸镇落网。但是后来，报导被删除。评论人士指出，这显示中共当局在掩盖云南血案的真相。
《财新网》引述接近警方人士的消息报导说，制造昆明血案的8人团伙曾在沙甸镇落脚，试图策划自制爆炸装置，但没有成功。其中有3人在2月27号被警方抓获。而其余5人则包车逃到昆明，于3月1号晚进入昆明火车站，酿造了惨绝人寰的“301”事件。
这篇文章在几个小时之后从《财新网》上删除。但是腾讯，搜狐，新浪网站的转载仍然保留。
原《财新》传媒调查记者庞皎明表示，他相信《财新网》的报导是可靠的。
原财新传媒调查记者庞皎明：“《财新》的报导肯定是很扎实才会发出来的，这应该是毫无疑问的。因为《财新》不可能贸然发一个未经核实的消息。”
原《中国海洋报》记者昝爱宗表示，如果《财新网》消息属实的话，那就说明，反恐也好，治安也好，制止暴力犯罪也好，云南昆明和红河州这边，应急反应都有很多问题。
原中国海洋报记者昝爱宗：“如果要追究责任的话，至少当地警方可能有责任。如果他知道这些人要作案的，他没有拦路设卡把他们控制住。酿成这么大的事情。有一百多人伤亡。至少要追究云南警方的责任，还有云南省里面的应对措施也有责任。他们知道这个情报，反而没有有效的去阻止。”
云南省委书记秦光荣，3月4号，在全国人大二次会议云南代表团驻地通报昆明事件时，提到“另外三名逃犯在云南红河州落网”，但是却有意隐去逮捕的时间。
昝爱宗：“如果真是一个暴力犯罪，你要是想让大家更放心，你先把真相都公开。比如这些人27号是怎么发生的？到3月1日又是怎么发生的？这期间这么多的时间内，到底又发生了什么东西？这些东西一公开以后，该谁的责任就追究谁的责任。但是现在一切都不透明。只知道人死了，受伤了。歹徒击毙了。剩下的人被抓起来了。但是这里面前后的逻辑关系、背景都不公开。”
昝爱宗表示，至于昆明血案背后是不是还有什么背景和各方势力的斗争，因为信息不公开，民众更加无法获知真相，也难以揣测。因此现在最要紧的是敦促当局公布真相。
在昆明砍杀事件发生之后，《南方周末》记者冯翔在微博上发布评论说，当局“从不告诉你真正发生了什么。”“从来不告诉你到底发生了什么，只让你盲目的仇恨，莫名的恐惧，稀里糊涂的活，不明不白的死。”
冯翔3月12号对《新唐人》表示，更多的真相还在等待人们去发现。
《南方周末》记者冯翔：“这个事情整个我都不知道是怎么回事。比如这些人为什么会杀人？比如到底现在死者和伤者情况怎么样？不知道的东西太多了。”
大陆微博作者严明写道﹕“我认为使用武力来维稳不是正确的方式。我们应该找到他们仇恨的根源，那将是解决冲突的正确方式。”
而这些言论已遭到当局的警告。北京网络安全警察贴出5个账号的截屏。警方说，他们“无视昆明杀戮的事实，歪曲情况，伤害人民的感情。”
除了警方威胁的这5个人，当局还在昆明事件之后围捕了45人，宣称他们张贴谣言，可能造成社会动荡。
采访编辑/秦雪 后制/孙宁
Three Members of Kunming Terror Gang Were Arrested
Prior to Killings
Chinese Caixin’s exclusive report on March 11 claimed
that three of the eight attackers in the Kunming murder were
arrested on Feb 27 in Shatian town, Yunnan province.
This report was later deleted.
Commentators believe the regime is hiding the truth of the
Yunnan murder.
Caixin quoted a police source that 8 attackers of the Kunming
murder had settled in Shatian town earlier.
They had tried homemade explosives but failed.
Three of them were arrested on Feb. 27.
The remaining five fled to Kunming in a rented vehicle, where
they planned and executed the tragic, massacre in Kunming
on March 1.
The article was removed from the Caixin website after a few
hours; but still searchable on Tencent, Sohu and Sina website.
Former Caixin investigative reporter Pang Jiaoming believes
Caixin’s report is reliable.
Pang Jiaoming, former Caixin Media investigative reporter:
“There is no doubt that Caixin would not publish something
if it’s not confirmed."
Former China Ocean News reporter Zan Aizong indicates that
if what Caixin has reported is true,
it shows the poor response and capacity of Yunnan to
terrorism, security, and violent offenses.
Zan Aizong, former reporter of China Ocean News:
“At least the local police have to take the responsibility.
If they already knew that the gang was planning the incident,
they should have set up the road block to chase them down.
Now there were more than 100 people injured.
The Yunnan police and Yunnan government should take the
responsibility.
They had the information, but they did not stop it from
happening."
On March 4, Yunnan Provincial Party Secretary Qin Guangrong
reported the Kunming incident on behalf of the Yunnan delegation
during the Second Session of the National People’s Congress.
He mentioned three other fugitives were arrested, but deliberately
hid the time of arrest.
Zan Aizong: “If you truly want people to relax, the truth about
the violent crime needs to be released:
Such as: What happened on the 27th? What happened on March 1?
What has happened between Feb 27 and March 1?
Once it’s publicized, then weigh up who is responsible.
But now, everything is unclear except that some are dead and
others injured; and the gangsters were either killed or arrested.
Nothing about the logistics, relationships, or background
have been revealed."
Zan Aizong questions the background and the struggles of various
forces behind the killing.
Since nothing is open, it is hard for people to learn the truth.
Therefore, he believes it is urgent for the government to release
the facts.
After the Kunming killing, Southern Weekly reporter Feng Xiang
commented in the microblog,
“The regime never tells you what really happened. You are
only given blind hatred, inexplicable fear, confused life and
unjust death."
Feng Xiang told NTD on March 12 that more facts are still
awaiting to be discovered.
Feng Xiang, Southern Weekly reporter: “I still don’t understand
why it happened. Why did they kill the people?
What are the situations of those who died and were injured?
There are so many things we don’t know."
Microblog writer Yan Ming wrote: “It is not right to maintain
stability by force. We should find the root of their hatred.
That will be the right way to resolve the conflict."
This account has now been deleted.
The Communist regime have issued warnings about those
Comments.
Beijing Internet security police posted screenshots of five accounts.
Police commented that these accounts are “ignoring the fact
of Kunming murder, distorting the situation, and hurting the
feelings of the people."
In addition to warning these five people, the police have
arrested 45 people after the Kunming murder and claimed that
their posts are rumors which could create social instability.
Interview & Edit/Qin Xue Post-Production/Sun Ning
