【新唐人2014年02月25日讯】住房难一直是中国大陆的主要社会问题之一，尽管当局不断抛出各种所谓“抑制房价政策”，但房产价格却愈发飞涨，民间对此诟病不断。今年年初，房地产税开征问题再次成为争议的焦点，地产大佬们纷纷控诉，当前大陆房价中附加的税费多如牛毛，政府最少要拿走70%，这才是房价高居不下的原因。当局声称为了“调控房价”而增加房地产税，只会进一步加重百姓的负担。
新一届上海市房地产行业协会会长，“上实城开”董事长倪建达，前段时间对媒体炮轰了中共的现行税收政策。倪建达表示，虽然房地产公司短时间内在一个时间点上结算的利润很丰厚，但交给政府的税更多。
那么政府税费到底有多少呢？目前存在三种版本，第一种是最保守的官方版本，据江苏省盐城市物价局2006年公布的一份房价构成清单显示，按照每平方米2289元来计算，政府收入为847元，所占比例超过37%﹔第二种是半官方数据，据全国工联在2009年的调查报告指称，政府拿到了房价中的49.34%。最后一种是地产商的说法，有着地产大鳄之称的“华远地产”董事长任志强认为，政府从房价中分得的份额至少占70%。
而最后一种说法得到了大部分房地产商的认可。
根据专业人士归纳统计，如果把房产商开发一处楼盘过程，从立项到完成销售进行分解，整个过程向各级政府机构缴纳的税费，涉及七大类37项支出。这些支出包括﹕房地产开发前期的土地出让金、拆迁管理费﹔前期的政策性收费，以及后期的营业税、印花税、城建税、企业所得税等。而这些税费负担大部分由开发商转嫁到了购房者身上，直接或间接转化为房价的一部分，最终推高了房价。
大陆金融分析师任中道：“为什么说房地产税出来没办法降房价呢？0148它不断的进行传导，所谓传导就是，它会不断的增加在终端。从成本开始算，慢慢的到销售环节，最后到百姓购买这一块，它都会层层的加上这个价。房地产商为了增加自己的利润，那它肯定会把这部分算在内，同样，即使没有房地产税，中共为了增加它的税收，它甚至可以起各种名目的费用。”
也有评论指出，政府如果诚心想降低房价，就应该减少附加在高昂房价中的税费，而不是反过来向民众征收房产税，这样只会进一步加重百姓的负担。
经济学家郎咸平曾经指出:“只要把房地产市场的各种税费取消，那么中国的房价马上下降70%。”
网民们纷纷回应，七成以上的暴利，政府怎么会容许房价降下来？高房价背后的推手一目了然。这也就不难解释为什么大陆近年来楼价疯涨、越调越涨、和各地政府不择手段疯狂强拆、强占百姓的用地了。
任中道：“从1994年中共开始执行分税制，分成国税和地税，那么相应土地方面出让的收入归为地方政府，所以地方政府就把它慢慢的做成了最大的一块财政收入来源。因此中央再怎么发号司令，10年出了43个调控政策，房价却翻了10倍，那最后背后的推手，是一目了然，就是各个地方政府在后面，0130实质归根到底，就是为了增加税收而已。”
但尽管民间和各界的反对声浪不断，却依然无法撼动中共当局征收房地产税的决心。
从去年底，民间就有传言说﹕“房产税将在2014年1月1号开征”，因此一度引发民间的反对声浪，虽然后来经官方证实为谣言，但仍有民众相信，这些说法并非空穴来风。
《中国经济网》指出，从公开的消息来看，官方已开始为实施房产税奠定舆论基调。文章还引述“中国房地产协会”副会长朱中一的消息说，“有关部门经过充分论证，房地产税在立法上的障碍已经没有了，这基本已取得共识。”
由此可见，当局对房地产税的征收，只是时间问题，但大陆的房价，却不会因为房地产税的征收而下降。
采访编辑/张天宇 后制/周天
Who is Pumping Up China’s Housing Prices,?
Chinese Government Gets 70%
Housing difficulty has always been a major social problem in
China, although the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) still
throws all kinds of ‘Policies to curb housing prices’.
The prices are soaring, and the people are
more and more critical.
Early this year, property tax levy has once again become the
focus of controversy.
Real estate bigwigs have complained that the current prices have
additional taxes on them.
The CCP takes at least take 70%, and this is the
reason for the persistent high prices.
The CCP claims this in order to ‘control prices’, but tax
increases in property will only deepen the burden on people.
The new president of the Shanghai Real Estate Trade
Association, ‘SIUD’ chairman Ni Jianda, criticized the
CCP current tax policy recently to the media.
Ni Jianda said, although real estate companies profits at a
certain time point are very high, the taxes paid to the CCP
are even higher.
Then how much are the CCP taxes really? Currently
there are three versions.
The first one is the most conservative official version,
according to Jiangsu Province Yancheng.
City Price Bureau published a price list in 2006, showing if
calculated according to 2289 yuan per square meter, the CCP
revenue is 847 yuan, which is more than 37%;
The second one is semi-official data. According to the
investigation from the National Federation of Trade
Union in 2009, the CCP takes 49.34% of the housing prices.
The last one is the developer version. ‘Huayuan Property’
chairman and real estate bigwig, Ren Zhiqiang believes that,
the CCP shares at least 70% of the housing prices.
The last version has been recognized by the majority of the
real estate businessmen.
According to professional statistics, if we divide the whole
real estate development process, from the project to complete
sale,taxes to all levels of the government agencies, there are
seven categories of 37 expenses.
These expenses include: management fees of real estate
development;
Early land transfer and relocation; pre-policy fees, and
later business taxes, stamp duty, urban construction tax,
corporate income tax, etc.
Most of these tax burdens are passed on the buyers from the
real estate developer, directly or indirectly becoming part of
the housing price, which ultimately pushes up the prices.
Mainland Financial Analyst Ren Zhongdao said: “Property
tax cannot help decrease the prices.
The understanding is that prices will continuously increase at
the terminal.
All levels from the cost, sales to purchase will be added to
the price.
Real estate developers will include these costs in order to
increase their own profits, even though there is no property tax.
The CCP can even make up a variety of expenses
to increase its tax revenue."
There are also comments that, if the CCP really wants to
decrease the prices, they should reduce the additional taxes
added to the high prices, rather than turn to the people for
property tax, which will only increase their burdens.
Economist Lang Xianping once pointed out that, “As soon as
the various taxes are cancelled on the real estate market,
China’s housing prices will drop 70% immediately."
Netizens have responded, with more than 70% profit how
will the government allow the price drop?
It is obvious who is pushing the prices up behind the scenes.
This also helps explain why in recent years the housing prices
skyrocketed, the more control, the more it increases, and also
explains the local CCP crazy demolition using all means and
land to dispossess the people.
Ren Zhongdao: “From 1994 the CCP started the tax system,
divided into National and Local taxes.
The incomes of land transfer go to the local governments, so
the local governments gradually make it the biggest financial
revenue source.
Even though the central CCP has published 43 control policies
in 10 years, the housing price has been doubled 10 times,.
The pushers behind the scene are obvious, it is the local
CCP offices that basically want to increase the taxes."
However, the continuous opposition from all sectors of civil
society cannot shake the determination of the CCP imposed
property tax.
At the end of 2013, there were rumors that a Property tax
levy will start on January 1, 2014.
This has caused opposition from the people, although it was
later confirmed as rumor .
Officially, there are people who still believe that these claims
are not groundless.
‘China Economic Net’ pointed out that, according to the
published information, the officials have already started to
develop the public tone of implementing the property tax.
The article also quoted ‘China Real Estate Association’ vice
president Zhu Zhongyi’s message that, “After full argument
from certain authorities, obstacles of legislating property tax
do not exist and this is basically a consensus."
The property tax levy is just a matter of time, and the
Mainland China housing prices will not decrease because of
the property tax levy.
Interview & Edit/Zhang Tianyu Post-Production/Zhou Tian
