【新唐人2014年01月15日讯】抗议《明报》换主编 李柱铭专栏开天窗
香港民主党创党主席李柱铭，1月14号以专栏开天窗方式，抗议香港《明报》更换主编计划。
李柱铭在《明报》副刊定期撰写的《法政随笔》专栏，14号仅出现标题“黑手盖日月 本报顿失明”。
李柱铭当天表示，这个标题是他所写，他的专栏开天窗是为了抗议《明报》管理层在没有令人信服的理由下，突然撤换总编辑刘进图。
李柱铭认为换总编辑的理由荒谬，希望《明报》的管理层作出的决定不要令香港人失望。
在此之前，香港也有多名学者联名致函《明报》，要求管理层解释撤换总编辑的理由，舆论分析认为，刘进图被撤换，可能与报馆资方亲共的立场有关。
宋彬彬道歉引热议 陆媒被命降温
中共前高官之女、中国最著名的“红卫兵”宋彬彬，日前就文革期间母校副校长卞仲耘被“红卫兵”打死事件，表示公开忏悔。她的道歉引起了舆论对清算“文革”的热烈议论。
很多人质疑宋彬彬的道歉没有深刻的反思，毫无意义。也有人认为，她的道歉只是为了推卸责任，洗白自己身上的“红卫兵”这三个脏字。
但更多的人认为，对“文革”反人类罪恶的清算，几个个人的道歉是远远不够的，应该受到清算的是发动“文革”的元凶毛泽东和整个中共党。
宋彬彬道歉事件引起的舆论狂潮也引起中共当局的不安，1月13号，美国网站“中国数字时代”透露，中共“国信办”已经发出通知，命令大陆网路对相关报导降温处理，要求各网站把“现有报导从首页撤下，互动环节也不要推荐相关话题”。
许志永案将开庭 各界申请旁听
备受外界关注的中国“公盟”和“新公民运动”发起人许志永案，日前传出即将开庭审理的消息，大陆各界人士纷纷向法院递交书面申请，要求旁听庭审。
据大陆《维权网》报导，1月13号，许志永的代理律师张庆方透露，他已接到北京市第一中级法院通知，许志永案庭前会议将在本星期五（17号）上午召开。
消息传出后，大陆律师陈建刚、维权人士李玉凤等纷纷申请要求参加旁听。
李玉凤还在申请书中表示，鉴于包括北京在内的全国多处法院，惯于违反刑事案件公开开庭审理的基本原则，采用多种方式限制社会公众旁听案件，因此，他们先递交旁听申请书及身份证复印件，提前排队，要求办理旁听证，并旁听许志永案件的庭审。
编辑/周玉林
Hong Kong Columnist Leaves Blank Editorial in Protest
The founding chairman of the Democratic Party, Hong Kong
Martin Lee Chu-ming protested on January 14 by leaving a
blank column instead of his regular feature in Hong Kong
newspaper Ming Pao.
Martin Lee is a regular columnist for Ming Pao on politics.
OnJanualy 14, he left the column blank with just the title,
“Black hand covers the sun and the moon, this newspaper
loses its brightness."
Martin Lee indicated that he wrote the title in protest of the
sudden editorial change in Ming Pao by the removal of the
chief editor Kevin Lau Chun-to.
Martin Lee pointed out the absurd and disappointing decision
of the newspaper, Ming Pao.
Prior to this, a number of Hong Kong scholars sent a letter to
Ming Pao demanding an explanation for the editorial change.
Commentators believe chief editor Kevin Lau was replaced
due to the newspaper’s pro-Communist regime stance.
Beijing Censors Reports of Song Binbin’s Apology
Song Binbin, daughter of Communist senior official, and the
most known Red Guard, apologized publicly the other day
for the death of deputy principal of her alma mater.
Her apology has drawn much heated debate on the dispersal
of the Cultural Revolution.
Many people criticized Song Binbin’s apology as meaningless
for lack of profound reflection.
Others also believe her apology was to shirk her responsibility
and to wash off the dirty “Red Guard" label.
Many more people indicated that absolving the anti-humanity
of the Cultural Revolution with just a few apologies is far
from enough.
Mao Zedong and the entire Chinese Communist Party ought
to be dissolved.
Song Binbin’s public apology has caused unease for the
Communist regime.
On January 13, China Digital Times revealed on its website that
the regime State Council Information Office ordered that: “All
websites must cool down the story", and “Remove the article
from homepages.Interactive platforms must not promote related topics."
Xu Zhiyong’s Case Draws Many Applications to the Hearing
For the upcoming trial of Xu Zhiyong, organizer of NGO
Open Constitution Initiative, many people across China
submitted a written application to the court hearing.
According to Chinese Human Rights Defenders report,
Xu Zhiyong’s attorney Zhang Qingfang received notice
from the Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court, that a
pretrial meeting will be held on the morning of Friday 17.
Lawyer Chen Jiangang and activist Li Yufeng have asked to
apply to participate as observers.
Li Yufeng wrote in her application that many courts nationwide,
including Beijing, are accustomed to violating basic principles
of a public hearing of the criminal case, and interfering with
public hearings in many ways.
They have decided to submit the application with the ID in
advance to permit them to attend the hearing of the pre-trial
meeting and also the hearing of Xu Zhiyong’s case.
Edit/ZhouYulin
