【新唐人2013年11月16日讯】菲律宾遭超级强台“海燕”重创，各国纷纷伸出援手。与蜂拥而至的外国救援行动相比，中共对菲律宾的援助如杯水车薪，甚至还不如瑞典的家俱连锁店“宜家家居（Ikea）”的捐款。外媒纷纷表示，这严重影响了中共的形象。请看报导。
对于台风“海燕”(Haiyan)留下的数十万无家可归者和饥民而言，蜂拥而至的外国救援行动，如一场国际慈善汇演。
美国的乔治•华盛顿号(George Washington)航母已抵达菲律宾，5000名船员和80架飞机把救灾物资运往被风暴重创的幸存者手里。此外，美国还承诺提供2000万美元的首批人道主义援助资金。
日本也派出一支1000人的海军力量﹔在途的赈灾力量还有英国的卓越号(Illustrious)航母，上面搭载着运输机、医疗专家和价值3200万美元的救援物资。
而中国，开始仅以“红十字会”的名义捐款20万美元，11月14号又宣布，增加150万美元援助物资。
而瑞典家俱巨头“IKEA”却捐助了270万美元，比中国捐的还多出不少。
对此，《美联社》指出，在中国正与美国竞争区域影响力之际，中共这种举动却损害了它在全球的形象。
英国《路透社》12号的报导也认为，中共在巨大台风灾害后给菲律宾的援助微不足道，或许浪费了在东南亚构筑善意的机会。
“香港城市大学”政治学教授郑宇硕认为，虽然中国和菲律宾在南中国海有主权纠纷，甚至国内部分人士对菲律宾还有民族主义的情绪，但作为中共领导层应该做的好些。
香港城市大学政治学教授郑宇硕：“这样做是不明智的。中国作为一个大国，需要展现它的风度，利用这个机会不但是争取菲律宾的民心，而且也争取东盟地区的民心。”
北京时政观察人士华颇也表示，中共的做法显得心胸狭隘，在外交上丢了分。目前中共是进退失据。
北京时政观察人士华颇：“菲律宾发生灾害时期，中共国内也正在乱得很，召开这个18届三中全会。如果他要是国内领导层里没有那么多内斗的话，我想不管他心里怎么想，表面上他还能干得漂亮一些。”
实际上，中共国家主席习近平，在菲律宾受台风“海燕”重创几天之后，才发出慰问电报。
中共喉舌《环球时报》的社论说，“中、菲因南海产生的恩恩怨怨，不应阻断两国民间共同抵抗天灾的合作。” 《环球时报》还批评，如果采取冷淡态度援助菲律宾，我们自己的损失，很可能会大于菲律宾因这项受援不足而受到的损失。
“新加坡国立大学东亚研究所”所长郑永年也认为，“中国仍然缺乏战略思维。”
不过，中共对共产小兄弟却一向慷慨。
去年7月，《环球时报》引述南韩《中央日报》的报导说，过去30年间，中共向北韩提供了1000亿美元的援助。
中共对阿尔巴尼亚的援助更无理性可言。
从1954年开始，中共给人口才200万的阿尔巴尼亚的经济、军事援助超过90亿元人民币。甚至在大饥荒最严重的1960年，还紧急援助了阿尔巴尼亚5万吨粮食、和时值2.5亿元人民币外汇的援款，以及19个成套项目。有人指出，如果将这5万吨粮食运到四川、河南、安徽等重灾区的饥民手中，至少可以少饿死100至200万人。还有学者指出，援阿还制造了一亿中国文盲。
华颇：“为了保住欧洲的社会主义的一盏明灯，中国可以说饿死人的情况下，还要保持阿尔巴尼亚人民的正常生活，可以说把阿尔巴尼亚霍查政权都给养活起来了。”
华颇指出，中共的做法更多的是从意识形态上考虑。
14号的《环球时报》也引述英国《每日电讯报》的报导说，中共最新的“道义和实践败局”，再次证明，中共仍无法承担全球大国的责任。
采访/易如 编辑/宋风 后制/李智远
Foreign Media: Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Loses
Credit on Meager Aid Donation to Philippine
Super typhoon Haiyan hit the Philippines, and the
international world give a helping hand.
Compared to aid actions from other nations, the Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) regime gave very little aid.
The CCP’s aid donation was even less than that of IKEA,
a Swedish furniture chain store.
Foreign media says it seriously damaged the image
of the CCP.
Here is the report.
narration:
Facing tens of thousands of homeless victims from typhoon
Haiyan in the Philippines, abundant of foreign aid are like an
international charity show.
The United States dispatched an aircraft carrier named
George Washington with 5000 crew and 80 aircrafts to
deliver relief supplies to typhoon victims in the Philippines.
The US also promised humanitarian aid of $20 million.
Japan dispatched 1000 navy forces.
England has dispatched an aircraft carrier named Illustrious
with transport aircrafts, medical experts, and relief supplies
worth $32 million.
The CCP only donated $200,000 in name of the “Red Cross”.
On Nov. 14 it added relief supplies worth of $1.5 million.
Swedish furniture giant IKEA donated $2.7 million,
which is much more than the CCP donated.
Associated Press points out that China and the US are
competitive on their regional influence.
But the CCP’s action harmed its international image.
UK media Reuters also indicated in report on 12th that the
aid from the CCP to Philippine after the typhoon disaster is
too small so the CCP has wasted the opportunity to build
up good relations in southeast Asia region.
Zheng Yushuo, professor of Political Science, City University,
Hong Kong says that China and Philippines have territorial
disputes in the south China sea, and some mainland Chinese
also have nationalism towards the Philippines.
The CCP leaders could have done better.
Zheng Yushuo: “It’s not smart to do that. As a big country,
China should show its demeanor.
It’s an opportunity to win hearts and minds of the Filipinos
and people of the ASEAN Regional.”
Hua Po, political observer in Beijing, also indicates that
the CCP’s action shows that it’s narrow-minded.
The CCP has lost credit on foreign affairs and in a dilemma.
Hua Po: “While the disaster was hitting Philippine,
the CCP was also in chaos of having the Third Plenum.
If there wasn’t that much struggle among the CCP’s
leadership, I think the CCP would have done a better job
on aiding the Philippines at least on the surface.”
In fact, the CCP leader Xi Jinping sent a condolence telegram
a few days after typhoon Haiyan hit the Philippines.
Editorial of Party mouthpiece Global Times says: “The south
ocean disputes between China and Philippines shouldn’t keep
on blocking the civil cooperations between the two countries.”
The report also criticize that China has indifferent attitude
in aiding the Philippines so our own loss may be more than
the Philippines has lost due to lack of aid in this disaster.
Zheng Yongnian, the director of the East Asian Institute
at National University of Singapore also believes that
“China is still lacking in strategic thinking.”
But, the CCP has been generous to
its communist brother countries.
Last July, Global Times cited Korean media Central Daily’s
report, indicating that the CCP offered $100 billion
to North Korea in the past 30 years.
The aid of the CCP to Albania was even irrational.
Since 1954, the CCP has offered Albania economic and
military aid of more than 9 billion RMB.
Even during 1960, the worst time during the Great Famine,
the CCP gave Albania emergency assistance of 50,000 tons
of food, donation of 250 million RMB, and 19 sets of projects.
Analysis says if the food had been sent to the victims
in Sichuan, Henan, and Anhui who were the hardest hit,
at least one to two million people could have survived.
Some scholars say the aid for Albania also led to
100 million illiterates in China.
Hua Po: “In order to keep the Communist country in Europe,
China had to keep people in Albania living a normal life,
even if people in China were dying from hunger.
China even fed the Hoxha regime in Albania.”
Hua Po indicates that the CCP’s actions are considerd more
from the perspective of ideology.
Global Times also cited UK’s Daily Telegraph on 14th Nov,
indicating that the CCP lost battles on both morals and
practice, which proves that the CCP still can’t assume
any responsibility of global power.
