【新唐人2013年09月30日讯】“王书金上诉案”因为牵涉到另一桩杀人悬案——聂树斌案，而备受外界关注。当年，法院认定聂树斌杀害一名女工，并将他处决。10年后王书金因故意杀人强奸罪被捕，他坦白10年前奸杀那名女工的真正凶手是他。但河北省政法部门却在日前宣判：王书金没有杀害女工。这无疑让这一奇怪的官司更显得黑幕重重。
9月27号，河北省高级法院对王书金故意杀人强奸上诉案做出二审宣判：被告人王书金犯故意杀人强奸罪，被判处死刑，剥夺政治权利终身。同时，判决否定王书金是“聂树斌案”的真凶。
2005年1月，王书金在河南被抓。他供述，自己曾强奸多名妇女并杀死4人，其中包括“1994年石家庄西郊玉米地奸杀案”，而这起案件早已结案，警方认定的“凶手”聂树斌已经在1995年被石家庄市中院执行死刑。
这种“一个案子，两个凶手”的奇怪现象受到外界高度关注，舆论普遍对聂树斌案的司法公正性提出质疑。
2007年3月，河北省邯郸市中院一审以故意杀人罪和强奸罪判处王书金死刑。但法院没有认定王书金为“玉米地奸杀案”的凶手，于是王书金上诉河北省高院。
王书金案辨护律师 朱爱民：“一审尽管王书金在法庭上对这个问题作了陈述，但是一审判决当中，并没有涉猎。没有对这个‘石家庄西郊玉米地案’作为一个犯罪事实去认定。基于这一点，王书金才提出上诉。”
聂树斌的母亲张焕枝至今为止已经为儿子申诉200多次，但河北高院一直没有对这一悬案进行再次立案审理。而“聂树斌案”的代理律师自2005年起，依照惯例要求查阅当年的卷宗，但一直遭到拒绝。
各界质疑：聂树斌案的卷宗里到底包含了什么秘密？现在，如果王书金被处决，聂树斌案将永无真相。
王书金案的辨护律师朱爱民表示，一般来说，二审都是围绕上诉人的请求和理由展开的，这就涉及如何甄别事实、论证证据的问题。
朱爱民：“河北高院在对王书金上诉的审理过程中，尤其是9月27号这次开庭宣判，我认为河北高院最大的失败是：以检察员的推测作为定案依据。”
外界分析，当年负责聂树斌案的公检法官员都已升官，因此很难翻案。而且，案件表面上是河北省高院负责，实质上是河北省“政法委”在操控。
河北蒙冤警察 周历：“‘上级有指示。’这是内部人、法院的人跟我说的。‘上级有指示’不让翻这个案。”
多年来，中国大陆的冤假错案一直不断，近年来更是越演越烈。对此，河北蒙冤警察周历表示，冤假错案的表面原因是法院听命于政法委，而根本原因则是中共一党专政，共产党错了没有人管。
朱爱民：“一个案子，两个凶手。在目前中国的司法实践当中，并不罕见。因为它确确实实在程序和事实认证上存在着问题。”
1987年，湖南麻阳屠夫滕兴善，被认定涉嫌杀死女服务员石小荣。 6年之后，“被杀的”石小荣返回老家，而滕兴善却早已被蒙冤枪决。
另外，湖北人士佘祥林因涉嫌杀妻，先后被判处死刑和有期徒刑15年。 2005年，佘祥林的“亡妻”突然现身，佘祥林才获释。他透露，自己是在被殴打10天10夜后被迫认罪。
而河南柘城男子赵作海，1999年被当地警方认定杀害农民赵振晌，2002年底被判死缓。 2010年，“死者”赵作晌突然回家。河南高院被迫承认：赵案是刑讯逼供导致的一宗错案。
采访/朱智善 编辑/李谦 后制/葛雷
Wang Shujin’s Case Covers Up The Truth
Wang Jinshu appealed against his death sentence.
his case is linked to another murder case, that of Nie Shubin, a man
who was executed for murder.
It drew public attention.
A long time ago, the court confirmed that Nie Shubin
killed a woman, Nie was subsequently executed.
10 years later, Wang Jinshu was arrested on
charges of raping and killing several woman.
Wang has claimed that he was the real murderer of
that woman in Nie’s case 10 years ago.
However, Hebei’s legal departments recently announced
that Wang Jinshu didn’t kill the woman.
This makes Wang’s case unique.
On September 27, in Wang’s 2nd trial, Hebei Provincial High
Court upheld Wang’s death sentence for raping and murdering.
Wang was deprived of political rights for life.
Meanwhile the verdict dismissed Wang’s claim that
he was the real murderer replacing Nie Shubin.
In January 2005, Wang Shujin was arrested in Henan Province.
Wang confessed he had raped several women, killing four.
It included killing a woman in Nie Shubin’s case,
in a corn field in Shijiazhuang City in 1994.
However Nie’s case has been closed, Nie Shubin was
executed in 1995 by Shijiazhuang Intermediate Court.
One case has two murderers, the phenomenon is viewed
by the public.
People widely questioned whether Nie Shubin
was wrongly sentenced or not.
In March 2007, Handan Intermediate Court in Hebei Province
gave Wang Shujin the death penalty in the first trial for raping
and killing.
The court didn’t confirm Wang was the real murder
of the “corn field case”.
Wang then appealed to Hebei Province High Court.
Zhu Aimin, defense lawyer for Wang Jinshu:
“Wang has testified on this point in his first trial.
The verdict didn’t consider his confession in relation to
the Shijiazhuang corn field raping and murdering case.
Wang appealed and asking for leniency owing
to his confession.”
Nie Shubin’s mother Zhang Huanzhi has appealed
200 times for her son.
Hebei Provincial High Court didn’t file it as
a new case for investigation.
Nie’s defense lawyer requested to carry out his legal rights
reading Nie’s case file, but was denied.
Observers wondered what the secret is in Nie’s file.
If Wang Shujin was executed now, there is no chance to
find out whether Nie was wrongly executed.
Wang Shujin’s defense lawyer said that generally,
the second trial will focus on the defendant’s requests.
It will cover how to identify an individual fact or evidence.
Zhu Aimin: “During the procedure of Hebei Provincial High
Court dealing with Wang Shujin’s appeal, especially on Sept.
27, their biggest failing is to make judgment according to the
inspectors’ speculation.”
Observers analyzed that the judge in charge of Nie’s case
was promoted so it is hard to reverse the verdict.
In addition, on the surface, Hebei Provincial High Court
was responsible for the case.
However it was Hebei Political and Law Committee who
controlled the case.
Hebei petitioner, officer Zhou Li: “They had Superior’s order,
a court insider told me, saying there is an order from higher up.
The order said the verdict can not be reversed.”
Many misjudged cases repeatedly occurred in China
for many years. It has worsened considerably recently.
Zhou Li said that the reason on the surface is that the
court listens to Political and Law Committee.
Yet the fundamental reason is the Chinese Communist
Party (CCP) is one-party dictatorship.
If the CCP made mistakes, no one is able to punish them.
Zhu Aimin: “One case with two murderers. It is not an isolated
phenomenon in the Judiciary practice in China.
It exists during procedures and ways of identifying the evidence.
There is a case in 1987, butcher Teng Xingshan in Hunan
Province was charged with killing a woman Shi Xiaorong.
Six years later, “dead” Shi Xiaorong returned
to her hometown Hunan.
However, Teng has already been wrongly executed.
She Xianglin, Hubei Province was suspected of murdering
his wife. He was sentenced to 15 years and death.
In 2005, She Xianglin’s wife suddenly reappeared,
then She Xianglin was released.
He said that after he was beaten for 10 days and nights
in prison, he was forced to confess he committed the crime.
Zhao Zuohai in Henan Province was charged of killing
farmer Zhang Zhenshang in 1999.
Zhao was given a suspended death penalty in 2002.
In 2010, “dead” Zhao Zhenshang suddenly came home.
Henan Provincial High Court had to admit that Zhao Zuohai
was wrongly sentenced due to having a forced confession.
