【新唐人2013年08月19日讯】大陆股市在上个星期的最后一个交易日上演惊魂一幕。沪指在上午短短3分钟内突然暴涨近6%，下午即被“打回原形”，以阴跌收盘。舆论普遍认为，这次股市“过山车”是光大证券“乌龙指”所致。同时，光大股指期货上的空头大增，成为当天股指期货市场上持空单过夜做多的机构，令整个事件更显得扑朔迷离。有分析认为，“乌龙指”背后可能另有阴谋。
长期处于熊市之中的A股市场8月16号上午11点06分左右，出现异动。原本平淡如水的大盘突然强力拉升，一度飙涨近6%，沪深300成分股中71只权重股瞬间触及涨停。
但是，下午开盘以后，市场有消息传出，这波行情是由光大证券的交易员下单失误制造的“乌龙指”行情。市场顿时回到了冰点，股指伴随着投资者失望的情绪一路下泻，最终以下跌0.65%收盘。
光大证券当天的公告声称：该公司“策略投资部门自营业务，在使用其独立的套利系统时出现问题，公司正在进行相关核查和处置工作。”
很多在当天进场的中小股民不幸成了“炮灰”。
广州股民施先生：“操纵股市是很容易的事情看来。一个是股民，一个是期货的投资者，都是一个很不公平的事情。因为有钱你一个大的机构可以操纵的情况下，因为股票很多人都是追涨杀跌的，一下子上去，一下子下来，那可能很-多人就给它套住了。”
据《北京晚报》报导，已经有5位股民就“乌龙指”事件损失赔偿向威诺律师事务所进行了咨询。律师认为，光大证券和上交所都应该对乌龙指事件承担责任。不过由于利益复杂，诉讼之路必定不会轻松。
美国南卡罗来纳大学教授谢田：“这些交易的记录都在，如果中国有健全的法制，中小股民和散户的权益可以得到保障的话，实际上是不难通过法律诉讼来讨回他们的权益的。但关键是中国法律形同虚设，即使有《证券法》、《反不正当竞争法》，但如果不能实施，等于特权阶层又从小股民身上大捞了一把。最后这件事情可能就这样不了了之。”
如果只看股票市场，“光大”这次“乌龙指”操作损失将极为惨重。不过，“中国金融期货交易所”公布的数据显示，“光大”期货当天大幅增仓了股指期货的空单。这意味着如果后市股指期货下跌，光大甚至可能会有所盈利，从而让整个市场为它的“误操作”买单。
大陆金融分析师任中道：“它（光大）随后有一个操作，就是增加股指期货，空头，就是为了弥补自己的损失。光大证券又作了这样一个操作行为，因此市场上说它有阴谋，有点操纵的嫌疑，在股指期货上面做这样的手脚。当然损失最惨重的还是跟风进场的中小股民了。”
大陆金融分析师任中道表示，一般投资者会认为，将现货价格强行推高，然后在期货市场上套利是操纵市场的行为。
《北京青年报》的文章质疑，光大的“乌龙指”事有蹊跷。因为一般的“误操作”只会发生单个股票的单笔交易上。但是光大却使大范围的71只股票同时在瞬间出现涨停﹔另外，当天上午股指出现两次疯狂上拉，说明这是一种有持续性的行为。
文章认为，事件的真相，可能并不只是“乌龙指”这么简单。监管部门如果能够从当天大量大盘权重股急剧拉升时的抛单入手，查一查到底是什么样的人，在这波异常行情中“意外获利”，或许能解开“乌龙指”的玄机。
到目前为止，大陆证监会及上交所尚未公布对此事的调查结果。
采访/朱智善 编辑/李明飞 后制/君卓
Concerning Moment as Shanghai Stock Market Appears to Hide Conspiracy.
The Chinese stock market exhibited
a concerning shift last week.
The Shanghai stock market jumped nearly 6%
in only 3 minutes, on the morning of August 16.
By the afternoon, it had decreased
back to where it was previously.
This sudden roller coaster ride was believed
a mistake caused by Everbright Securities.
Everbright Securities became the one that held the most
buyers that day, due to the surge of bears for futures.
It is believed that a conspiracy may exist behind this incident.
A concerning incident took place on the
A-share market at 11:06 on August 16.
The stock suddenly pulled strongly, to nearly 6%. 71 stocks
of the Shanghai – Shenzhen 300 index surged to the limit.
However, it was rumored that afternoon that the surge was
a mistake made by Everbright Securities in placing orders.
The market suddenly returned to the freezing point and
closed with a disappointing 0.65% decrease in stock index.
Everbright Securities issued a statement on the same day:
“Everbright Securities strategic investment department’s
proprietary trading unit had problems in the operation
of its independent arbitrage system.
The firm has started an investigation."
Many small and medium investors were sacrificed that day.
Mr. Sze, Guangzhou investor: “It seems easy to manipulate
the stock market, and is unfair to individual investors.
With the money, a large organization can easily manipulate
the stock. Many individual investors can be hitched."
Beijing Evening News reported at least five
investors have consulted “Beijing V Law" law
firm, regarding damages and compensation.
The law firm believed that both Everbright Securities
and Shanghai Stock Exchange should take responsibility.
However, complex interests will make litigation difficult.
Professor Xie Tian, University of South
Carolina: “These transactions were recorded.
With a sound legal system, individual investors are protected,
and legal proceedings to recover losses would not be hard.
However, the problem is in fact
law does not really exist in China.
The Securities Act and the Anti-Unfair
Competition Law have never been enforced.
It is very likely this incident will just turn out to be nothing."
It looks as if Everbright will suffer
heavy loss from this incident.
However, according to China Financial Futures
Exchange data, Everbright had a sharp
increase in bears of stock index futures.
This means that if the market outlook index futures
fell, Everbright may even profit from the mistake
and the entire market pays for its mistake.
Ren Zhongdao, Financial analyst: “Everbright recovered its
loss by increasing the stock index futures and the bears.
This operation is believed to be a conspiracy. It is
suspected to be a manipulation in the stock index futures.
Small investors are surely the ones
who suffered losses from this operation."
Ren Zhongdao indicated that ordinary investors
believe it is a market exploitation by forcibly pushing
the price and profit through the futures market.
Beijing Youth Daily suspected Everbright’s mistake.
Any typical error could occur to a single transaction.
However, Everbright’s mistake
happened to 71 stocks at the same time.
It was also a persistent behavior, given the fact that
the crazy pull in the index took place twice that morning.
It is suggested that the facts could be far more complicated.
Regulatory authorities should be able to solve the
mystery if they find out who “accidentally profited"
during the fluctuation of the markets that day.
So far, China Securities Regulatory Commission and the
Shanghai Stock Exchange have not commented on this.
