【新唐人2013年08月15日讯】近日，中共党媒发表文章宣称，一些意见领袖及学者歧视朝鲜，用抨击朝鲜“指桑骂槐”的作法不厚道。文章还指责，许多人以中国是“大号的朝鲜”来否定中国，贬低社会主义制度等等。大陆学者分析认为，恼羞成怒的中共是在用一种变相的恐吓来警告民众，骂朝鲜就是骂中共，借此封住民众的嘴巴。
8月13号，中共喉舌《环球时报》发表题为《用抨击朝鲜指桑骂槐，此法不厚道》的评论文章声称，韩国媒体报导朝鲜正式宣布“世袭制”，是因为对朝鲜抱有敌意。文章认为，中国一些意见领袖及学者严重歧视朝鲜，甚至有些人经常用批评朝鲜“指桑骂槐”，借此来贬低中国社会主义制度。
北京时政观察人士华颇认为，这是当局一种变相的恐吓。
北京时政观察人士华颇：“它是想利用这个办法进行一种威胁，封住那些民众的嘴巴，尤其是意见领袖，还有一些学者，封住他们的嘴巴，你们不要再指责朝鲜了，你们指责朝鲜就是指责我中共，所以骂我中共，那是没有好下场的。”
上海著名演员周立波发微博表示：“人们指桑骂槐，原因只有一个：直接骂槐不安全，连批它两句都有风险。以前有人骂过，这老槐恼羞成怒把一些人吊在槐树枝上，一些人埋在槐树根下，另外一些绑在了槐树桩上。”
周立波质问：“混球时报罔顾这一切，反倒说指桑骂槐不厚道，到底是谁不厚道？！”
大陆网络作家荆楚：“中国社会太恐怖了，不能直接批评，直接批评就可能坐大牢，一个政党不允许批评，宣称自己伟大、光荣、正确，这个伟大、光荣、正确是站不住脚的。”
北京宪政学者陈永苗：“《环球时报》是中国公众舆论跟媒体的搅屎棍，它把中共体制里面最臭的地方，它给搅出来翻给大家看。”
《环球时报》的文章还指责一些学者，用所谓不存在的逻辑来论证中国是“大号的朝鲜”，借机否定中国的进步。
中国历史教授章立凡发微博认为，中国不算“大号的朝鲜”，朝鲜才是升级版的中国。政治道路区别：国朝，诸侯世袭制，君主禅让制﹔金朝，君主世袭制。
荆楚则表示，公众说中国是“大号的朝鲜”一点没有错，其实就是“西朝鲜”。
荆楚：“朝鲜经历的灾难中国都经历过，朝鲜现在仍陷于大饥荒之中，还在饿死老百姓的金家王朝，对老百姓实行恐怖，实行奴隶，老百姓现在每年还有上百万的人在饿死。”
被誉为杂交水稻之父的中国水稻专家袁隆平，在前年4月8号接受《广州日报》专访时披露，中国所谓的三年自然灾害，饿死了四五千万人，其实是人为造成的。
华颇：“环球这篇文章也是一种灭火，想消除民众的仇恨，那就是我们要比朝鲜好的多，但是，中国的状况和朝鲜是五十步笑百步，虽然说中国进行了改革开放，进行了经济改革，但是怎么样呢？由于不进行政治改革，所以它这个经济体制改革带来的巨大的利益，被特殊权贵给占有了，闹的天怒人怨。”
华颇认为，在某种程度上讲，中国还不如朝鲜，因为中国巨大的贫富差距，及权贵阶层对民众的肆意掠压，使老百姓产生了非常大的仇恨，也将成为引爆中国发生革命的一个重要因素。
采访编辑/李韵 后制/黎安安
Chinese Regime Warns Scholars Over “Veiled Abuse" of North Korea.
Chinese Communist Party (CCP) state-controlled
media has censored some Chinese opinion leaders
and scholars for their “veiled abuses" of North Korea.
These media have also accused many people of negating
socialism, by dubbing China as a “queen-size North Korea".
Some Chinese scholars view that this is
the CCP using a disguised intimidation.
It is warning that criticism of Pyongyang equates to
blaming the CCP, and so is attempting to silence people.
On August 13, CCP state run media, “Global Times",
labeled those who criticize North Korea as “unkind”.
Its commentary says that South Korean media
reporting on Pyongyang’s “hereditary" is hostile.
It states that some Chinese opinion leaders and
scholars have serious discrimination against N. Korea.
It also states that some Chinese have often belittled
China’s socialism, by outwardly criticizing N. Korea.
Hua Po, political observer in Beijing, takes
this as a disguised form of CCP intimidation.
Hua Po: “It uses this approach to silence public
criticism, including opinion leaders and scholars.
It is hinting that condemning North Korea is
condemning the CCP, which would take a risk."
Zhou Libo, a Shanghai stand-up
comedian, commented on his micro-blog.
He writes that, “there is only one motive for the
public to “point at the mulberry tree (North Korea)
while reviling the locust tree (CCP)".
It is because cursing the locust tree directly is
dangerous, and even to criticize it is risking ones life.
Previously, the old locust tree
was angry for being scolded.
Afterwards, it hanged some people on its branches,
buried some under its roots, and tied some to its stump."
Zhou continues, “The Global Times ignored all these facts.
In turn, it accuses those of being unkind for
their veiled abuses. Who is really unkind?!"
Jing Chu: “Chinese society is too horrible, and
straightforward criticism may place oneself in jail.
A ruling party forbids criticism of it, and proclaims itself as
being “great, glorious and correct", but which is untenable."
Chen Yongmiao, Constitutional scholar in Beijing:
“The Global Times is a media that stirs the
dirtiest aspects of the Chinese regime,
and publicizes them to the public."
The Global Times also accuses some
scholars of arguing with “non-existent logic".
This lack of logic is said to attempt to prove
that China is “a queen-size North Korea”.
It states that they negate China’s progress.
Zhang Lifan, a history professor in
China, posts his views in his micro-blog.
He says that China is not a “queen-size North Korea",
but instead, N. Korea is an updated version of China.
He compares political roads taken in two countries.
China adopts a system of governors
hereditary and monarch abdication.
Pyongyang is a hereditary monarchy.
Jing Chu says that it is not wrong to say
that China is a “queen-sized N. Korea".
To be exact, it is “West North Korea".
Jing Chu: “All disasters that N. Korea have
experienced had historical versions in China.
N. Korea is still being caught in a great famine.
The Kim dictatorship has continued domestic terrorism.
Each year, millions of people there die of starvation."
Yuan Longping is known as China’s “Father of Hybrid Rice".
In April 2011, he told Guangzhou Daily that in
the CCP’s alleged period of “3-years of natural
disasters”, 40-50 Million Chinese faced starvation.
The historical truth is that the
starvation was purely man-made.
Hua Po: “The Global Times’ article plays
a role in eliminating hatred of the public.
That is, China is much better than North Korea.
But China is actually swimming in the same soup.
China has carried out reforms and opening
up, as well as economic reforms, but so what?
Without carrying out political reform, the country’s
enormous benefits brought by the economic
reform have been taken by privileged groups.
Also, it has triggered widespread wrath and discontent."
Hua Po remarks that in a certain sense,
China is even worse than North Korea.
Today in China, there exists a huge rich-poor gap.
Also, the privileged groups wantonly
plunder and bully the masses.
All this has bred great hatred among the populace.
This hatred will become an important factor
in igniting a revolution in China, he warns.
