【新唐人2013年07月01日讯】最近海外中文媒体爆出一篇文章，自称是中共中央办公厅官员所写。文章批评中共政治局常委刘云山垄断对习近平言论的解释权，并披露了宣传系统和刘云山家族的腐败丑闻，文章放风说：“除掉刘是不错的选择”。外部观察认为，这篇文章警告意味很浓，刘云山如果继续挑战习近平，很可能会成为被拿下的“大老虎”。
这篇引起关注的文章披露：中共中央办公厅几天前接到一份来自中纪委的情况通报，说宣传口腐败已经达到无法想像的程度。根据中共最高领导人掌握的调查情况，刘云山不但有大量的财产说不清，而且他的亲信不是在海外住豪宅，就是在国内各地把持新闻口，通过新闻审查机制大收买路钱。
文章写到，中宣部垄断宣传，最后竟然“欺负到习近平头上”。原本习近平办公室对“中国梦”的推出、解释与宣传都有自己的部署，可中宣部一上来就垄断了解释权，根本不把习近平放在眼里。习办工作人员通过多种途径表达不满，但宣传部门见到对自己不利的贴子就删，弄得习办与中办都很无奈。
时事评论员 蓝述：“他（刘云山）对中国梦、宪政梦的诠释，引起了党内的极大不满，还有国内知识界、党内开明一派的极度不满。”
时事评论员蓝述指出，习近平上台之后，一直在按照中共十八大报告的执政方针，试图走平衡左派、右派的中间路线。在目前这种各界对刘云山普遍不满的情况下，习近平有可能会顺势处理刘云山。
蓝述：“北京高层和习近平下不下决心去查刘云山的主要因素，它不在习近平自己的手上，主要取决于中国社会外界、中共体制之内和之外对北京官方的压力。”
6月号的香港《前哨》杂志报导，习近平、李克强草拟了一份反腐意见书，将取消“政治局常委不立案调查”的内部规定。
6月22号至25号四天，中共政治局召开专门会议，习近平要求政治局成员“自觉维护中央权威”。这被外界普遍解读为，习近平对一些政治局委员或者常委的警告。
北京时政观察人士 华颇：“估计经过敲打，刘云山就会老实一些。因为这届常委和胡锦涛那一届常委有很大的不同。”
北京时政观察人士华颇指出，胡锦涛时期各常委实权较大，而习近平上台后要建立一个以他为核心的强势中央，但刘云山的所作所为触动了习近平的权威。如果刘云山看不到这一点，继续表现张扬的话，肯定不会有好的结果。
华颇：“现在刘云山是不是成为大老虎，关键就是他和习近平的矛盾是不是激化，是不是他接受了这次教训，在习近平的这次敲打之下，变得老实起来。”
署名中办官员的这篇文章还批评了中国的新闻审查制度，指出宣传部门早已沦为利益集团维护自己利益、鱼肉老百姓的工具，情况之严重甚至已经超过胡作非为的政法系统。根据中纪委掌握的消息，几乎所有的宣传部门，尤其是负责监管互联网的，都是收钱办事。各大新闻媒体尤其是网站，逢年过节都要向国新办与北新办的领导送巨款进贡。
最后，文章建议习近平打“大老虎”，拿中宣部与新闻审查机构开刀，除掉刘云山和北新办等腐败堕落的毒瘤。
采访/易如 编辑/李谦 后制/葛雷
Is Xi Jinping planning to get rid of Liu Yunshan?
Oversea Chinese media recently published an article
which claimed to be authored by an official from
the General Office of the Central Committee of
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The article made the criticism that Liu Yunshan,
a politburo standing committee member, had monopolized
the power of interpreting of Xi Jinping’s theoretical route.
It also revealed corruption scandals involving the whole
propaganda system and Liu’s family,
suggesting that “It may be a good move to get rid of Liu”.
Outside observers say that this article has a strong
implication of warning Liu Yunshan.
If Liu continues to challenge Xi Jinping’s authority,
he may end up “a big tiger” caged by Xi.
The article revealed that the General Office of the CCP’s
Central Committee recently received a report from the
Central Commission of Discipline Inspection,
drawing much attention.
The report described corruption inside the propaganda
system as unimaginably bad.
According to Party leaders and their findings, Liu has a
huge amount of property, the details of which are unknown.
Furthermore, his family members and followers
either live in luxury homes overseas,
or recklessly collect bribes in China by controlling the
framework of news censorship.
The article says the China’s central propaganda department
has been exploiting it’s power, and has even dared to kick around Xi Jinping.
Xi’s office had originally planned a course of announcing,
interpreting and propagating his “China dream”;
but from the start, the propaganda department
has had it’s own plans, completely ignoring Xi’s scheme.
Xi’s office has thus expressed their discontent
in many ways.
However, the propaganda department has simply deleted
any terms that are unfavorable to them.
Both Xi’s office and the General Office of the Central
Committee could do little about it.
Lan Shu, political commentator: “Liu Yunshan’s interpretation
of Xi’s ‘China dream’ and ‘constitution dream’ has resulted in strong grudges inside the CCP.
Chinese intellectuals and Party members of the liberal faction
are also extremely unhappy with what Liu has done.”
Lan Shu says that since taking power, Xi’s been consistently
following the policy presented in the 18th National Congress.
That is, Xi tries to stay in a centrist route which balances
between leftists and rightists.
As there is now widespread discontent against Liu Yunshan,
it’s possible Xi will use the opportunity to take away Liu’s power.
Lan Shu: “It’s not because of any personal reason that
prevented Xi Jinping and other CCP leaders from investigating Liu Yunshan previously.
The key factor is how great the pressure is that comes from
voices of insiders, outsiders and the whole Chinese society.”
Hong Kong’s Outpost magazine reported in its June issue that
Xi Jinping and Li Keqiang had drafted an anti-corruption plan,
which suggested abolishing an internal rule that
“politburo standing committee members should not
be investigated for prosecution”.
Between June 22nd and 25th, the CCP’s politburo held
a special meeting.
Xi required politburo members to “actively defend
the authority of the Party’s central committee”.
Xi’s words are widely interpreted as a warning message
to some politburo or standing committee members.
Hua Po, Beijing political affair observer: “After being warned,
it’s likely Liu will, more or less, restrain himself,
because the composition of the current politburo standing
committee is quite different from the previous one.”
Hua Po says that during Hu Jintao’s rule, politburo
standing committee members had more power at hand.
After Xi took power, he planned to establish a mighty central
group around himself, but this was impeded by what Liu Yunshan did.
If Liu fails to realize this and continues to act recklessly,
he may not have a good ending.
Hua Po: “Will Liu become ‘a caged big tiger’?
This depends on whether the conflicts between him and Xi
become further intensified, and on whether Liu will learn
a lesson and restrain himself after Xi’s warning.”
The article authored by a Central Committee General Office
official also criticized China’s news censorship system.
It revealed that the propaganda system has become a tool
of protecting interest groups and exploiting Chinese people,
and the situation is even worse than that of a lawless
political and legal system.
According to investigation by the Central Commission of
Discipline Inspection, almost every propaganda agency,
especially those in charge of internet information,
abuse their power to grab money.
During holidays, all the major media and websites have to
pay huge “tributes” to the leaders of China’s State Council
Information Office or the Beijing Information Office.
The article ended by suggesting that Xi “catch the big tiger”.
That is, targeting the propaganda department and news
censorship agencies to get rid of Liu Yunshan,
the Beijing Information Office and other corrupt
individuals and agencies.
