【新唐人2013年06月24日讯】“人民大学”副教授杨晓青，上个月在中共理论性刊物《红旗文稿》，登出一篇题为《宪政与人民民主制度之比较研究》的文章后，在中国社会掀起了“倒宪”与“挺宪”的辩论。这个为社会主义卖命的教授，最近被“人民大学”解聘了。为什么呢? 请看本台记者的报导。
5月22号，杨晓青提出﹕“《宪政》的关键性元素和理念只属于资本主义，而不属于社会主义”。
日前，网传杨晓青遭到“人民大学”解聘，民间普遍认为，杨晓青被解聘与她发表的这篇文章有关。不过，官方解释，杨晓青一年期满不再续聘，符合规定。
杨晓青的这篇文章发表后，大量被中共媒体转发，同时，也迅速招来了中国学术界和舆论界的批判。
中国资深法学专家赵远明指出，尽管中共几十年来一直没法可依，或有法不依，但是在江泽民执政期间，将中国法律破坏到不可复加的地步，引发的社会矛盾激化到极点，已经危及到中共的统治，习近平上台后，希望用“宪政梦”之说来挽回后果。赵远明认为，解聘杨晓青，是习近平反击江派的开始。
中国资深法学专家赵远明：“跟习近平叫板，作为一个教授，实际上是江派的一个爪牙，江派5月这种逆流，是完全针对习近平的，所以我觉得，以后不管是杨晓青，还有其他的媒体，都会遭到习近平的整肃。”
网友留言说: 想投机，却成了替罪羊。
另外，时政评论家蓝述认为，中国经济处在大崩溃的前夕，社会矛盾急剧恶化，中共内部改革派和左派之间的斗争，如果继续公开化，会加速中共的解体，因此中共高层急忙出来平息这种激烈的交锋。
时政评论家蓝述：“因为这样公开交锋等于昭告所有的人，中共分裂了，所以在这种情况下，中共高层处理公开出来叫骂另外一派的，就不奇怪了，主要原因还是要平息两派之间的公开纷争，至少在公开场合还能保持党的统一这么一个形象。”
中国社科院近代史研究员马勇告诉《新唐人》，杨晓青在06年批“北京大学”法学院教授贺卫方时，就是这种思路。马勇认为，杨晓青太封闭自己，恐怕至死也不能解除马列的毒素。
中国社科院近代史研究员马勇：“她接受的教育，和她所从事的东西，那就在那里面被误导了，就类似这种坚持。他到死了都没有觉悟过来，可以同情他，但是可以不理解，到了21世纪，民主宪政，3岁小孩都知道是个好东西，不论体制外的、体制内的，都不会去这样谈论，社会主义是不能有民主的。”
《九评共产党》指出，在中共的历史上，中共利用农民为其抢占地主土地，最后农民成为三等公民，利用工人为其夺取资本家财产，最终成为下岗游民，甚至中共的创始人及领导者，无不被中共迫害致死。而，只有最邪恶，能够给予中共能量的才能和中共彼此利用。
曾经在“人民大学”工作近十年的博客作者周亚辉撰文说，在“人民大学”像杨晓青这样的教师，至少有上千人。他还表示，1950年左右，“人民大学”在北京成立时，目地是培训中共干部，它本来就是中共用马列主义等思想，毒害中共干部的贩毒基地。
采访编辑/刘惠 后制/葛雷
Why Professor Yang of Renmin University get Fired?
Last month, Yang Xiaoqing, an associate professor
at China’s Renmin University,
published an article in Hong Qi Wen Gao, an internal
magazine of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The article is titled “Comparison between Constitutional
Governance and Socialistic People’s Democracy”.
This has led to a wide discussion among Chinese about
whether to support or deny constitutionalism.
However, the author who devoted herself to supporting
socialistic regime was recently fired by Renmin University.
On May 22nd, Yang Xiaoqing’s article
was published online.
It said: “The key institutional elements of constitutionalism
only fit capitalist countries and do not fit socialist countries”.
Days ago, news of professor Yang Xiaoqing being fired
by Renmin University has been spreading on the internet.
It’s widely believed that this is directly related
to her article on the constitutional system.
On the other hand, the official announcement claimed that
Yang’s one-year contract had reached it’s end,
and the decision was only a regular one.
After being published, Yang’s article had been reprinted
by the CCP’s mouthpiece media on a large scale.
At the same time, it has received heavy criticism by
scholars and other media.
Senior legal expert Zhao Yuanming says that in the past
several decades the CCP never really abided by the law.
During Jiang Zemin’s rule, China’s legal system
was further destroyed to an absurd extent.
The consequential social conflicts have become so intense
that the CCP’s governance has been threatened.
After Xi Jinping took power, he attempted to save the
situation by presenting “a dream of constitutionalism”.
Zhao believes that firing Yang Xiaoqing was an initial step
of striking back at Jiang’s group by Xi.
Zhao Yuanming: ”As a professor, Yang dared to
publicly oppose Xi Jinping’s route because she was a follower of Jiang Zemin.
The acts taken by Jiang’s group in May were completely
directed against Xi.
Therefore I think either Yang and her like, or other
media that attacked the constitutional system
will face purging by Xi in the recent future.”
Some Chinese netizens have said that Yang wanted to
speculate politically, but ended up a scapegoat.
Political commentator Lan Shu says that
with China’s economy on the verge of collapse,
social conflicts are being rapidly intensified.
In such a situation, if power struggles between the CCP’s
reformist faction and leftist faction is further made public,
the collapse of the regime will come even earlier.
Accordingly, CCP leaders want to hastily quell
the fierce battle.
Lan Shu: “Openly battling equates to announcing
the split of the party to everyone.
So it’s not strange to see any party leader
punishing those who attacked the other group publicly.
They not to openly have battles between the two factions.
They want to at least maintain the Party’s image of
cohesion and unity in public.”
Ma Yong, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of
Social Sciences, told NTD that back in 2006 Yang Xiaoqing
had presented the same theory to criticize He Xiaofang,
a law professor at Peking University.
Ma says Yang closed her self off too much and might
never get rid of the poison of Marxism from her mind.
Ma Yong: ”Her mind has been misdirected by
the education she received and her job,
which leads to her insistence in Marxist theory.
Maybe she won’t be able to realize the mistake until death,
which is really both pitiable and absurd.
In the 21st century, even children know that
the constitutional system is a good thing.
No matter whether inside or outside the regime, nobody will
say ‘the constitutional system doesn’t fit socialism’ any more.”
The Epoch Times’ Nine Commentaries on
the Communist Party points out that,
in the past, peasants were deceived by
the CCP to grab land from landlords,
but were treated as inferior citizens in the end;
workers were deceived to grab the wealth of capitalists,
but ended up the jobless class.
Many of the CCP’s founders and leaders
have even been persecuted to death by the party.
Only the most evil ones can strengthen the CCP’s ability
to survive and take what they need from the party.
Zhou Yahui is a blogger who worked at
Renmin University for ten years.
Zhou says that at Renmin University there are at least
several thousand teachers who think like Yang Xiaoqing.
Zhou also says that when Renmin University was founded
around 1950 in Beijing, its initial goal was to train CCP cadres,
so since it’s beginning it has been a base for the CCP
to contaminate people’s minds with Marxist ideology.
