【新唐人2013年05月06日讯】大陆微博有消息说，《财讯》传媒集团旗下《Lens视觉》杂志2013年4月号的调查报导《走出“马三家”》，因为曝光了辽宁省马三家女子劳教所女性劳教人员被酷刑虐待的问题，被暂时停刊。知情者透露，目前围绕“马三家”的局势诡异，北京高层态度暧昧，各种利益集团正在角逐。
5月4号，名为“蓝鲸财经记者内参”的新浪微博发布消息说，《Lens视觉》杂志被暂时停刊。许多网友向《Lens视觉》杂志的微博询问求证，但是杂志对此保持沉默。
《Lens》联席副主编罗昌平4月26号在微博上发消息说，《Lens》杂志报导辽宁女子劳教一文，历经四年采访二十多位当事人和证人，掌握人证、物证，采取交叉认证方法落实证据成文刊发。辽宁调查组未向报导提及的当事人取证，仅通过“自查”得出报导内容“系恶意捏造和无中生有”、“歪曲事实”、“严重失实”的结论显失公允。期待负责任的客观、公开的调查。
北京媒体界一位知情人透露说，目前针对“马三家酷刑”报导的局势特别诡异。因为《Lens》杂志属于黑龙江的刊号，有关部门找到黑龙江方面，要把这个刊号中断。而杂志的负责人希望通过其他办法，找到新的刊号延续这份刊物。
知情人还透露，辽宁地方当局也不敢公开宣布他们的所谓结论，而北京对这个事情的态度很暧昧，实际上就是各种利益在角逐。
“蓝鲸财经记者内参”的微博账号也发消息说，“希望戴小京、法满，能顺利找到新的刊号，保证这本杂志能顺利出刊。”戴小京是财讯传媒集团总裁。
北京外国语大学国际传播研究中心主任乔木副教授表示，他也注意到停刊的消息，但是无法证实。如果确实停刊，也不意外，这样的事情中国一直在发生。多年前《中国青年报》的副刊《冰点》就因为观点犀利而被停刊。
对于《走出“马三家”》这篇报导，乔木认为，从专业角度来看，这是一篇非常成功的文章。
北京外国语大学新闻学副教授乔木：“据杂志副主编罗昌平介绍，是经过专业记者四年多的调查取证，而且采访了不同的信源，是一个有理有据的报导。这种事情，不光是在网上，包括舆论上一直认为劳教有许多不合法不人道的地方，而且这次更主要通过这样一个扎实的报导，我觉得是一个非常好的事，对废除劳教是一个非常好的推动。”
乔木认为，辽宁调查组提出的报导“严重失实”的结论没有说服力。乔木表示，如果要做调查，第一需要很长的时间，第二要跟当事人取证，包括与记者的沟通，但实际上都没有去做。
乔木：“你说别人不属实，你自己得有一个确凿的调查，就是你要跟当事人，有没有一些取证啊？而且你这个证据是不是多方的、多角度的来回求证，不仅仅是引用一下管教人员。特别这样的事，调查本身要有独立性，不能说据网上透露，说这个调查组的组长，原来就是马三家的管理人员，也是司法局的什么干部。这本身公信力就没有。”
大陆律师滕彪近日发微博表示，国内有关马三家的报导不是完全真实的。因为它掩盖了2/3的更恶劣、更恐怖的真实情况。
滕彪所指的“更恐怖的真实”引发网友的关注。
有网友猜测，莫非是传说中的活体摘除器官？还有网友表示，《美国之音》、《BBC》都关注了，据说有可能涉及到器官之类的敏感话题。
在辽宁调查报告公布后，《走出“马三家”》的作者——记者袁凌，多次在微博上质疑调查报告的公正度。目前袁凌新浪微博账号已经遭到删除。
4月22号，在辽宁调查组结论出炉之后，袁凌发表声明说：建议辽宁教养院起诉本人，双方当庭对质，出示人证物证。若我果然造谣污蔑，尽可追究刑责。若报导属实，也请法庭追究教养所虐待者以及包庇的司法厅官员刑责。
采访编辑/秦雪 后制/陈建铭
Lens Magazine Suspended Over “Masanjia Article”
Some people are saying that magazine “Lens Vision” has been
suspended because it published a report “Walk out of Masanjia”.
The report disclosed that women prisoners
in Masanjia labor camp have been brutally tortured.
On May 5th a microblog called “Lanjing Financials Insider
News” posted that magazine “Lens Vision” was suspended.
Many netziens tried to confirm the news with Lens.
However the magazine remained silent.
Luo Changping, Vice President of “Lens” published
a piece on his micro-blog .
He talked about the report on women prisoners
in Liaoning labor camps.
Luo stated that it took “Lens” four years to interview
more than 20 prisoners and witness.
Then the article was completed by combining
testimonies with material evidence.
On the other hand, Laoning investigation group
never obtained any evidence.
They concluded that the Lens report is “purely fabricated”,
“distorting the truth”, “severely inconsistent with the truth”.
This is obviously unfair to Lens.
We expect a more objective and transparent investigation.
Someone from Beijing’s media circle with inside knowledge,
said the “cruel torture in Masanjia” situation is very weird.
Lens magazine is registered in Helongjiang province. A
government department asked to suspend Lens’ registration.
However, Lens might find other ways, e.g.
re-register, to save the magazine.
The person also disclosed that Liaoning investigation group
dare not reveal their “conclusion” on cruel torture in Masanjia.
Meanwhile, Beijing’s attitude toward this event
has been very ambiguous.
As a matter of fact, different factions might be
contesting for various interests.
The micro-blog “Lanjing Financials Insider News” said: “With
luck, Dai Xiaojing is able to find a new registration for Lens.”
Dai Xiaojing is President of Caixun Media Group.
Qiao Mu, Associate Professor of Beijing Foreign Language
University and Director of International Media Research Center, also noticed the news of Lens being suspended.
“It’s not surprising that the magazine has been suspended.
This happens in China every day. Years ago, “Icing Point”, from
“China’s Youth” was also closed for its sharp comments.
Qiao Mu thinks that Len’s report “Walk out of Masanjia”
is an outstanding report from a professional viewpoint.
Qiao Mu: “Based on Luo Changping, Vice Chief Editor of Lens,
it took professional reporters more than four years
to investigate and obtain various evidences.
In addition, multiple information sources have been adopted.
It’s a very solid and sound report.
Actually, it’s widely agreed that the Chinese Communist Party’s
(CCP) policy of ‘reeducation through labor’ is illegal and inhuman.
Now Lens completed such a solid report on it.
It’s a great thing to do.
It will help abolish the so-called ‘reeducation
through labor’ policy.”
Qiao Mu stated the conclusion drawn by Laoning Investigation
group that “Lens severely distorts the truth” is unconvincing.
First, it would take a longer time to investigation.
Secondly, evidence has to be obtained from the people
covered in Lens’ report, including those who did the interviews.
As a matter of fact, none of this was done by Liaoning
investigation group before they made their conclusion.
Qiao Mu: “If you are saying Lens is distorting the truth,
you have to perform a solid investigation.
Did you obtain any evidence from people involved?
Has evidence been obtained from different aspects?
You cannot just quote the words of folks who actually manage
the labor camp. The investigation has to be independent.
As disclosed from the internet, the head of the Liaoning
investigation group used to run Masanjia labor camp.
If so, there is no credibility in their conclusion.”
Teng Biao, lawyer in China, posted in his micro-blog:
“Official reports on Masanjia are inconsistent with the truth.
Many more much worse and more terrifying truths
have been concealed.”
“The more terrifying truth” stated by Teng Biao
has caused widespread attention from the internet.
Some netziens suspect “the more terrifying truth”
could be live organ harvesting.
Some people stated that both “Voice of America” and
“BBC news” have paid attention to this topic.
The sensitive topic of live organ harvesting might be proposed.
After Liaoning Investigation Group published its report,
Yuan Ling, author of “Walk out of ‘Masanjia’” questioned the creditability and fairness of the report.
Now Yuan Ling’s Sina micro-blog account has been deleted.
On April 22nd after Liaoning Investigation Group disclosed
their investigation conclusion, Yuan Ling made a statement.
He said, “I advise Liaojing Labor Camp to sue me, and then
both the labor camp and I can face each other in open court with victim testimonies and material evidence.
If I indeed distorted the truth,
I would assume the criminal liability.
However, if my report is factually accurate, the labor camps
and related officials should assume the criminal liabilities.”
