【新唐人2013年03月29日讯】中国大陆《环球时报》网站发表评论文章，指称：中共新领导人习近平，关于坚持中国特色社会主义道路的内部讲话，未能传达给广大民众，导致社会上误传曲解不少，需要加强宣传，以澄清所谓的“是非”。有学者认为，习近平上台之后，释放两种矛盾信号。请看以下报导：
文章作者昆仑岩表示，习近平在十八大后发表一系列有关澄清是非，端正方向的讲话，“但由于传达范围有限，媒体宣传很少，广大党员干部和人民群众想看看不到，想听听不到，社会上误传曲解不少”。
据国外媒体披露，习近平去年12月在深圳对党内的讲话中，提到苏联解体的教训，他认为，应该由高层推动反腐、和渐进式的经济改革，但不能动摇中共执政地位。
作者提出四个需厘清的重大问题，包括：当今中国要搞的是什么主义？对改革开放前的社会主义历史能不能否定？今天推进改革发展还要不要坚持实践标准？共产主义信仰有没有过时？
作者引用习近平的话，自行推出了答案。
大陆中央民族大学哲学和宗教学系教授赵士林分析说，从习近平的一系列言论来看，他是要搞一种政治对冲。
赵士林：“一方面他要坚持传统的、正统的意识形态的价值观。那么，习近平先生十八大以来，也是非常明确的、鲜明的强调要改革，包括整个新班子，所谓习李新政，非常强调改革，并且反腐败也有非常坚决的态度。也提出了把权力放到笼子里、打老虎与打苍蝇。”
不过，赵士林指出，这些问题的产生，恰好是传统政治体制和模式下的产物。
赵士林：“我用这个词叫做政治对冲。我说政治对冲是很危险的游戏。必须要坚持改革，坚持深化改革，从经济体制改革到政治体制改革，放弃特殊利益集团的利益，放弃你的一党私利，真正为中国人民着想，为中华民族着想，那不是不能解决问题。”
那么，是什么原因，造成习近平集两种矛盾理念于一身呢？
赵士林：“李克强也曾经讲过，利益固化的问题要解决，要壮士断腕。如果仅仅是思想意识问题，没有这么严重的。这里面肯定首先是个利益问题。那么背后很多利益集团，大的小的，他们出于自己的利益，肯定对政治模式、经济模式，乃至意识形态原则，都有不同要求。”
赵士林表示，这些不同要求不外乎体现为两大趋势，一个是维护现有体制，一个是推进改革。赵士林认为，维护现有体制的势力非常强大，而推进改革也有强烈的呼声。因此，习近平在这两方的利益博弈中妥协，才出现了两种看似矛盾的声音。
赵士林：“但是呢，老革命家当中有很多开明派，习仲勋是比较开明的改革开放，他的姿态也一直是比较开明的。这样一些因素，再加上时代的因素，肯定能影响到习近平，所以说，这样一些因素，从观念的角度、从思维的角度、也纠结到他一个人身上。”
有关外媒报导的习近平内部讲话，是否存在﹖赵士林表示，他无法确认。而原中国政法大学校长江平也表示，他没有看过相关内容。
原中国政法大学校长江平：“没有没有，我没有见过。我也没有看到网站，因为我也不上网。”
北京独立学者章立凡向媒体指出，中国大陆的左派人士从习近平的讲话中得出，他拥护马列主义、和毛泽东思想的结论。右派同时也抓住习近平所讲的：“把权力关进制度的笼子里”等。章立凡说：左右两派都在习近平的讲话中取得了自己想要的东西，当局要的就是这个效果。
采访编辑/秦雪 后制/薛莉
Leftists Threaten Xi Raising Four Questions
The Chinese “Global Times” has published a commentary
on line, in which it is alleged that in a recent speech,
Xi Jinping speaks about adhering to socialism with
Chinese characteristics,
these remarks have not been published for fear of
arousal of misunderstandings and rumors.
A propaganda that should be formed which can clarify
the difference between “right and wrong”.
Some scholars thought that there were two contradictory
signals released by Xi Jinping after taking power.
Let’s see the following report!
Kunlun Rock, author of the article, said that Xi Jinping
has delivered a series of speeches that focus on
“clarifying right and wrong, correcting direction”,
Rock continues: “but distribution is very limited,
and the media hasn’t reported much on it. ….
There are many misunderstandings and rumors going round
because most of the CCP’s officials and the public haven’t yet seen it although they have wanted to.”
It has been revealed by foreign media that Xi Jinping made
mention of the lessons of the collapse of the Soviet Union
when he spoke for the CCP in Shenzhen in last December.
He thought that the senior level should promote an
anti-corruption reform and a gradual economic reform,
but that the reforms shouldn’t shake the CCP’s ruling position.
The author raised “four questions that need to be clarified”,
including: which kind of doctrine does China engage in?
Whether to deny socialist history before the
Reform and Opening Up?
Whether today’s reform and development
needs to adhere to practice standards?
Whether belief in communism is out of date?
The author answered all the questions by quoting
Xi Jinping’s own words.
Zhang Shilin, professor from the Philosophy and Religion
Division of China Central University for Nationalities
analyzed that Xi is going to make a “political hedge “
with his words.
Zhang Shilin: “On the one hand, he wants to adhere to
traditional, orthodox ideological values.
Xi then emphasizes very firmly and clearly that reform
will be needed after the 18th National Congress.
The new leaders of the Xi-Li leadership emphasize reform,
and have a very strong stance on corruption.
They are also required to detain power inside a cage,
to fight the tigers and the flies.”
However, Zhao Shilin pointed out that all these questions
are generated by the traditional political system and modes.
Zhao Shilin: “I call this Political Hedge.
The political hedge is a very dangerous game.
It must adhere to the reform, deepen the reform,
from the economic reform to the political reform must
give up the interests of the special groups and the Party,
must really think about the people, and about China
as a nation, then it will solve the problem.”
Then what is the reason causing Xi to have
these two contradictory ideas?
Zhao Shilin: ”Li Keqiang also said that it should solve
the issue of the fixed interests’ distribution system by the words ‘hero cuts the wrist’.
If it’s only an ideological question, it won’t be that serious.
There’s an issue of interests. There are many interest groups,
big or small, behind everything.
They have different requests for the political mode,
economy mode, even wanting ideological principles to protect their benefits.”
Zhao Shilin said that those different requests
were showing two trends:
one is to maintain the current system,
and the other is to promote reform.
Zhao Shilin thinks that the power group wanting
to maintain the current system is very strong,
but there are also strong voices asking for reform.
Xi has compromised with these two groups and
that’s the reason why he spoke in self contradiction.
Zhao Shilin: “However, there are some liberals among the old
revolutionaries, who are like Xi Zhongxun (father of Xi Jinping).
He is a relative liberal and supports reform and opening up.
Xi Jinping was impacted by these facts and
by the forces of the times.
So I say that from the conceptual point and
perspective, these facts will effect Xi Jinping.”
Whether the internal speeches of Xi Jinping that
were reported by the foreign media existed or not?
Zhao Shilin said that he couldn’t confirm it
one way or another.
Meanwhile Jiang Ping, former president of
“China University of Political Science and Law”,
said he hasn’t received related information.
Jiang Ping: “No. No. I have never seen it.
I have never seen it on line, because I don’t surf the internet.”
Zhang Lifan, a Beijing independent scholar, told media that
the leftists in Mainland China heard that Xi Jinping champions
Marxism-Leninism, and Mao Zedong Thought in his words.
The rightists also caught Xi’s points made such as:
“detain power inside a cage”.
Zhang Lifan said that both leftists and rightists had
found the meanings that they wanted, which was
the result hoped for by the authorities.
