【新唐人2013年02月09日讯】中共总书记习近平最近表示，共产党容得下尖锐批评。他希望党外人士积极提意见，中共各级党委也要主动接受民主党派和无党派人士监督。不过，学者认为，各界给中共提的意见已经很多了，中共能按照它自己制定的宪法做，民众就满足了。
中国共产党总书记习近平6号与党外人士共迎新春的时候表示，中国共产党要容得下尖锐批评，做到“有则改之、无则加勉”；而党外人士要敢于向中共建言，做到“知无不言、言无不尽”。
习近平希望各民主党派和无党派人士“多建睿智之言，多献务实之策”。他还表示，“中共各级党委要主动接受、真心欢迎民主党派和无党派人士监督，切实改进工作作风，不断提高工作水准。”
中国各报纸、和网站纷纷转载习近平的这一讲话。
不过，在中共媒体大肆宣传习近平最近的讲话同时，民间却对习近平讲话的内容打了问号。有网民问，网上批评共产党官员和揭露贪腐的文章和网站，不会再被遮罩了吗？微博不会继续被删了吗？
“山东大学”退休教授孙文广对《新唐人》表示，共产党在上个世纪50年代也让人们给他提意见，结果很多人被打成“右派”，他质疑，这次会不会也像以前那样？
1956年，中共当时的最高领导人毛泽东，鼓励知识份子向党提意见，隔一年却转变为“反右运动”。据官方的统计数字，当年被打成“右派分子”的人数为552877人，其中许多人被迫害至死。孙文广就是当年的右派，是多次被关进监狱的“老运动员”。
海外中文网站《多维网》也有评论指出，中国人还敢说真话吗？五七年也好，五八年也好，文革也好，八九年也好，哪一次说真话不死人？那么，现在拿什么来证明大家说完真话以后不被秋后算账呢？
山东大学退休教授孙文广：“ 意见大家平常大家提了很多了，其中一个就是开放报禁，不要干扰互联网，不要封人家的博客，让民众畅所欲言发表自己的观点。”
孙文广指出，新上台的习近平应该做的事情是按着宪法逐步开放党禁、报禁，按照中共制定的宪法来保障公民的人身自由，民众就满足了。
因“煽动颠覆国家政权罪”入狱3年的大陆著名异议人士胡佳向媒体表示，习近平不需要大谈“建言”，只要他释放因言获罪的政治犯，就能证明他与其他领导人不一样，否则，他所讲的一切都是空话。
孙文广：“还有很多人关在监狱里，其中包括政治异见人士、不同信仰者、维权者关在监狱里。比较有名的像刘晓波判了11年、高智晟现在关在监狱里，家人都看不到他，还有其他一些，这些人应该尽早的放出来。”
民众对习近平的这番讲话还有其他解读。
“权利运动”组织负责人胡军认为，现在中国官民对立越来越大，民间反弹的力量也越来越强大，如果中共还采取像以前的高压政策，中国随时会像高压锅那样爆掉。所以习近平的话更像是为减压而采用的缓兵之计。
“权利运动”负责人 胡军：“ 微博产生以后，资讯传递速度非常快，而且每个人都是一个话语平台。这时候中共他想继续保持他以前那种控制媒体，已经做不到了，它已经力所不能及了，这个体制随时崩塌。他看到这种局势，他只能说这种话。”
报导指出，目前实际情况是，批评“平坟”的赵克罗，仅仅是批评就被取消了政协委员的资格；而天天说假话长达55年的申纪兰，又被党挑选为人大代表了。你相信共党会容忍尖锐的批评和意见吗？但历史证明，缺少真话，是历朝灭亡的前提！
采访/田净 编辑/宋风 后制/钟元
Xi Jinping asked for advice, saying the Party can tolerate sharp criticisms
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) secretary general
Xi Jinping recently said the party can tolerate sharp criticisms.
He asked non-party people to give more advice and required
party committees at all levels to actively accept supervision
by people of democratic parties and without party affiliation.
However, scholars remark that outsiders have made more
than enough suggestions to the CCP.
Chinese people would have been satisfied if the CCP could
really abide by its own constitution.
On Feb 6th the CCP’s secretary general Xi Jinping attended
a Chinese New Year party with non-party people.
In his speech, Xi said the CCP should tolerate sharp criticisms.
By following the principle of “correcting existing mistakes
and guarding against potential ones”.
At the same time, he hoped outsiders were courageous in
advising the CCP and “saying all they know without reserve”.
Xi Jinping expected people from democratic parties and
without party affiliations to make more wise suggestions.
This would provide more pragmatic approaches.
In addition, He said “the CCP committees at all levels should
actively welcome and accept supervision by democratic
parties and non-party people, earnestly improve working
styles and continuously raise working quality.”
Xi’s speech was subsequently reported by most Chinese
newspapers and news websites.
On the other hand, although the party’s mouthpiece media
are hyping up Xi’s speech, many Chinese civilians remain skeptical about what he said.
Some netizen asked, “Will the CCP stop blocking articles
and websites that reveal the corruption of party officials?”
“Will the CCP stop deleting microblog messages?”
Retired professor of Shandong University Sun Wenguang
told NTD that the CCP had asked for advice in the 1950’s.
However many people were labeled as “rightists”
and suppressed because of making suggestions.
Sun questioned whether the same scenario
will happen this time.
In 1956, the CCP’s supreme leader of the time Mao Zedong
encouraged intellectuals to advise the CCP.
Only one year later, the party started “Anti-Rightist Movement”.
According to official statistics, 552,877 people were labeled
as “rightists” in the campaigns.
Many of them were persecuted to death.
Sun Wenguang was also one of the victims as he was
imprisoned several times during the movement.
Oversea Chinese website dwnews.com published an article
doubting Chinese still have the courage to speak the truth.
The article reviewed the history of Anti-Rightist Movement,
Cultural Revolution and June Fourth Incident.
It concluded that each time there were many killed
because they told the truth.
Therefore, how can the CCP make Chinese believe that
they won’t be punished this time?
Sun Wenguang, retired professor of Shandong University:
”We have made more than enough suggestions these days.
One of them is to lift the ban on the press, not to interfere
with speeches on the Internet, not to block any microblogs and to allow civilians speak their minds freely.”
Sun remarked that, Xi Jinping as the new CCP leader should
lift bans on political party activities and on the press.
To protect the citizens’ freedom as required by its constitution.
The Chinese people will be satisfied if that can be achieved.
The famous Chinese dissident Hu Jia had been imprisoned
for three years for “inciting subversion of state authority”.
He told media that Xi Jinping doesn’t really need to
ask for advice.
As long as he releases political prisoners arrested for their
speeches, he will prove he is different from past CCP leaders.
Otherwise, all he said can only be empty talk.
Sun Wenguang: ”Many are still in prison, including political
dissidents, religious believers and human rights activists.
A famous example is Liu Xiaobo who was sentenced
to 11-years imprisonment.
Gao Zhisheng is also imprisoned and cannot meet his family.
Liu, Gao, among others should be released as soon as possible.”
At the same time, there are other voices analyzing
the real purpose behind Xi’s talk.
Hu Jun, founder of Human Rights Campaign, said opposition
between the government and the people is enlarging in China.
As the civilians’ resistance becomes stronger, China might
explode like an over-pressured pot at any time if the CCP continues its repressive rule.
So, Xi’s talk is more likely to be a strategic measure of
temporary pressure reduction.
Hu Jun, founder of Human Rights Campaign: ”As microblog
appears, news and information are transmitted very quickly.
In addition, everyone becomes a platform for speech.
Currently the CCP is no longer able to control the media and
peoples’ free expression as it did before.
It is beyond it’s capability to sustain the same level
of speech restriction.
In such a dangerous situation that the regime can fall apart
at any time, Xi Jinping has no choice but to say something.”
Some articles also remarked that, Zhao Keluo’s committee
membership of Henan political consultative conference was
removed only because he criticized the “grave-razing
movement” initialized by the provincial government;
On the other hand, Shen Jilan who repeatedly lied for 55 years
was again selected as a member of the Peoples Congress.
How can you believe that the CCP will tolerate sharp criticisms?
However, history also shows that the lack of true words
was always followed by the fall of dynasties.
