【新唐人2013年01月10日讯】新京报“抗旨”未遂 网站刊文表不满
“南周事件”引发的风暴继续发酵，外界关注的焦点已经从南转到北。据北京《新京报》记者通过微博发布的消息，1月8号，《新京报》因抗拒中共中宣部的命令，拒绝转载《环球时报》批评南周事件的社评，遭到北京市委宣传部副部长严力强上门施压，以解散报社要挟，强令《新京报》刊登，社长戴自更口头辞职抗争没有结果。1月9号，《新京报》以新闻消息形式，还是转载了《环时》的社评。
但是，《新京报》网站主页却同时刊出一篇题为《南方的粥》文章，内容说﹕“一碗热滚滚的砂锅粥,来自南方大地，它似乎也有一颗勇敢的心，在寒冷的夜里…”文章内容被外界认为，摆明与《南周》同进退的姿态。
《潇湘》刊灭害广告 恶搞环时社评
与《新京报》一样被迫转载《环球时报》社评的《潇湘晨报》，也以自己的独特方式表达不满和不屈。
1月9号，《潇湘晨报》在转载《环时》社评的版面上，同时刊登巨幅广告，广告词为：拨打96360，订购除虫灭害服务，“杀光”为止。讽刺和不满溢于版面。
美媒：南周事件刮花中共亲和形象
美国《华尔街日报》1月9号也针对南周事件发表评论说，“南周事件”更大的意义，在于反映了中国的传媒，以至整个社会，都越来越难以顺服于一个一党专政的制度。
评论最后指出，拥有一切资源的党，可以遏制异见者，而在这场风波中，也许仍将如此，除非发生一场当局难以控制的全国性的反传媒审查运动。而无论事件如何收场，这只会再一次刮花中共向国内外所宣示的“一个快乐而亲和的形象”。
英媒：中共抛薄案转移视线
英国《电讯报》1月9号报导，中共喉舌《新华社》当天发出快电，以一种典型的模糊方式，对薄熙来的“严重违法案件”发出公告，文章暗示，薄熙来庭审的日子已临近，但并没有透露审判日期或审判地点，或任何进一步的细节。
《电讯报》说，网上传言说，那个公告只是一个诡计，旨在转移媒体的视线，因为现在，发生在中国南部的有关新闻自由的抗议活动已经进行了三天。
编辑/周玉林
Beijing News Publisher Refused Chinese Communist
Party (CCP) Order In Vain
Southern Weekly incident increasingly intensified,
triggering the focus from South to North.
Beijing News newspaper (BJ News) posted news on microblog
that, on Jan. 8th BJ News refused to follow orders from the
CCP Propaganda Department and refused to repost
Global Times editorial article criticizing Southern Weekly.
Yan Liqiang, vice minister of the propaganda department
of Beijing City arrived to enforce it.
He threatened to shut down BJ News if they didn’t listen and
forced them to reprint the Global Times article.
Dai Zigeng, the publisher of BJ News verbally refused to
obey the order, but in vain.
On Jan. 9th BJ News reposted Global Times editorial article.
Meanwhile, BJ News published the article
“Southern Porridge” on the front page.
It read: “A bowl of hot porridge from the southern land,
showing a brave heart during the chilly night…”
Outsiders interpreted that the article declared to stand
by Southern Weekly.
Xiaoxiang Morning Herald’s Advert Against
Global Times Editorial Article
Xiaoxiang Morning Herald encountered the same problem
as BJ News did, which was to forcibly repost Global News editorial article.
However, they used their own way to express their anger.
On Jan. 9th Xiaoxiang Morning Herald put a large advert on
the same page as the reposted Global Times editorial article.
The advert: Call 96360, order kill pest control service.
until its all dead. Dissatisfaction was ironically expressed.
US media: Southern Weekly Incident Scratch
Communist’s Face
On Jan. 9th the Wall Street Journal commented on
the Southern Weekly incident.
It said that the Southern Weekly incident’s greater
significance is to reflect the media.
The whole society is finding it more difficult to follow
one-party dictatorship system.
The article concluded that owning every resource,
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can suppress dissidents.
Unless there is a national movement against press Censorship
which is not under CCP control, everything will be the same.
No matter how the incident ends up, it scratches the CCP’s
face who draws itself as the image of happiness and harmony.
British Media: Xinhua News On Bo Xilai Trial
Diverts Attention
On Jan. 9th UK’s Telegraph newspaper reported the Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) media, Xinhua news agency briefly
mentioned Bo Xilai’s “Serious law violation case”.
Xinhua hinted that Bo’s day in court was approaching, but
failed to give a date, location for the trial or any other details.
The Telegraph said that there was speculation online, saying
that Xinhua’s announcement was simply a ruse.
Its purpose is to divert media attention.
An ongoing row over press protests has now been held
for three days in southeast China.
