【新唐人2012年12月31日讯】大陆中宣部下发通知，要求各下属机关和媒体对新闻报导进行改进，提倡“短、实、新”，反对“假、长、空”。但这一规定并不被外界看好。评论指出，中共一党独裁之下，宣传部门和媒体只是党的喉舌、工具，在民众没有言论自由的情况下，类似的规定只是为了延续中共统治，迷惑公众，不可能解决根本问题。
12月26号，中共中宣部发出通知，要求党报、党刊、通讯社、电台、电视台要从新闻报导、内容、语言、标题、篇幅到版面编排、栏目设计、节目制作等方面，进行全面改进，提倡“短、实、新”，反对“假、长、空”。
对此，深圳独立作家朱建国向《新唐人》表示，实际上中共早自延安时代以来，就一直存在着文章“假、长、空”的问题，中共也曾经多次试图进行改变。
深圳独立作家朱建国：“但实际上，每次都改变不了。可能重新提的时候，会有一点点的变化，但是它不可能真正的长久，也不可能真正的消除。因为这个假、长、空是一党专制的必然党文化。”
朱建国还指出，要想杜绝“假、长、空”，就必须有真正的社会民主监督。
朱建国：“但现在8个民主党都只是花瓶或仆人，所以在这种状态下，什么改进作风，这些东西都是些老调，都解决不了根本问题，都只能是一时性的作秀而已。”
12月4号，新上台的中共总书记习近平召集政治局会议，制定了八项新规，其中包括要改进新闻报导。12月11号，新任中宣部部长刘奇葆对习近平进行呼应，在公开讲话中要求媒体改变文风。随后，中宣部正式出台《通知》，要求下属机构制定具体方案，中央媒体发挥示范带动作用。
时事评论员邢天行：“中宣部把大家对宣传上的意见，导向所谓的文风。也就是说：作者本身导致这种假大空现象。显然它是在转移方向，也是在迷惑公众。”
时事评论员邢天行认为，中宣部这个通知并不是改变文风这么简单，它的背后有一个大背景。那就是，中共在巨大执政危机之下，试图通过做一些技巧性的改变，来维持中共统治。但中共设立独有的“中宣部”对所有媒体进行严格监管，媒体沦为“党的喉舌”，改变文风必然是一句空话。
邢天行：“它（中宣部）的设立本身就是要监管。那它要监管它就要过滤。它要过滤的话，它的那些下属在写文章的时候，为了保存自己、迎合上级，或者是替中共去做发声筒的话，他可能去讲真实的东西吗？”
台湾《旺报》援引自由作家、大学教授胡勇的文章指出，就在刘奇葆讲话后的第二天，大陆官媒《新华社》发出一篇近2000字的评论文章《敢啃硬骨头，敢于涉险滩──习近平重要讲话引起强烈反响》。胡勇质疑，《新华社》的这篇文章共提到10名代表，其中官员4名、官方智囊4名、企业家1名，而普通群众只有1人。干部群众比例严重失调，文章有作假嫌疑。此外，当今中国人普遍对所谓的领导人讲话不关心，文章却号称民众“反应强烈”，这是官媒自说自话，根本不符合常情。
采访/陈汉 编辑/李谦 后制/王明宇
Communist Propaganda Style Hard to Change
The Communist Central Propaganda Department
recently required improvement of news reporting.
Instead of being “fake, long and empty,” it asked
for the news to be “short, concrete and real.”
This regulation wasn’t previously being regarded.
It is said that under the one-party dictatorship, the propaganda
facilities only serve to be the party’s mouthpiece and tools.
There is no freedom of speech.
Any such regulation is only to continue the Communist
ruling by deceiving the public and will not solve any problem.
On December 26, the Chinese Communist Party Central
Propaganda Department issued a regulation.
It advocated an overall improvement of news reports
to all relevant media.
From the content to the layout, all programs need to be short,
concrete and real, instead of being long, empty and fake.
Shenzhen independent writer Zhu Jianguo told
New Tang Dynasty TV that
false long empty reporting has been an issue since
the Yan’an era, even though change has been advocated by Communist reports.
Shenzhen independent writer Zhu Jianguo:
“In fact, it cannot change.
Every time it was mentioned, it changed a little.
It never lasts and will never really change.
This false long empty style is a party culture under
the dictatorship."
Zhu Jianguo indicates that only a genuine social democratic
supervision will end the “fake, long, and empty” style.
Zhu Jianguo: “The existing eight Democratic Parties
are just to decorate the Communist Party.
The so-called improvement is only a replay of an old show.
It will not solve any problem."
On December 4, the Communist new General Secretary Xi
Jinping issued eight new rules in a recent Politburo meeting.
December 11, the new Propaganda Minister Liu Qibao
echoed Xi Jinping’s request by asking the media to change the reporting style in a public address.
Subsequently, the Central Propaganda Department official
notified subordinate media agencies to develop programs accordingly.
Political commentator Xing Tianxin: “The Propaganda
Department directs the issues towards the writing style.
In other words, it is the writers who created those
fake long empty reports.
Obviously it is to divert the focus and to deceive the public."
The political commentator Xing Tianxin believes that
the Central Propaganda Department’s notice is not really about changing the reporting style.
It is a tactic to maintain the Party’s ruling under the
current political crisis of the regime.
The Central Propaganda Department strictly supervises all
media to ensure they only serve to be the regime’s mouthpiece.
Changing the reporting style is an empty promise.
Xing Tianxin: “It (the Central Propaganda Department)
was set up to supervise.
It supervises through screening. To ensure survival,
no subordinate will dare to speak the truth."
Taiwan’s Want Daily reported an article by freelance writer
professor Hu Yong who indicated that
the day after Liu Qibao’s address, the Communist regime’s
mouthpiece, Xinhua News Agency, published a commentary.
This commentary indicated that Xi Jinping’s speech
has caused a popular response.
Hu Yong indicated that Xinhua’s report mentioned 10 people.
They are four officials, four people from the think tank
of the government, one entrepreneur, and one citizen.
With such a serious disproportion of officials versus people,
the genuineness of the article is questioned.
Meanwhile, the majority of Chinese nowadays care nothing
about officials’ speeches, but the article claimed it received a “popular response” from the public.
It is believed to be a self-made claim by the officials
and does not make sense.
