【新唐人2012年12月29日讯】12月27号，中共河南省委机关报《河南日报》在头版社评位置发表文章，批判此前在微博上，反对河南省发起平坟运动的赵克罗。据了解，赵克罗是河南政协常委，是所谓八个“民主党派”之一的民革成员。而就在3天前，中共新任总书记习近平刚刚强调，要加强多党合作。在这个时候《河南日报》猛批赵克罗，难道是要公开和习近平作对吗？
《河南日报》发表的题为《理性对待 凝聚共识》的文章声称，赵克罗随意在网上发布“不当言论”，甚至质疑中国共产党领导下的“多党合作制”，以政治话语暗含杀机，对个人进行攻击，是自89年以后，在中国地方政治中罕见的。
今年5月，赵克罗实名发布微博，炮轰南阳市集中整治墓葬的行动，指责当地只铲平民祖坟，却不动“副处级祖坟”。赵克罗的言论，引发外界对河南当局强烈的舆论批评，11月份，河南平坟运动被迫搁浅。
12月17号，赵克罗实名发布《一个省政协常委的忏悔书》。文中提到，得知自己下一届“省政协委员及常委的提名被拿掉”，“因为在南阳平坟事件中，给领导添了乱”。
他“忏悔”道：原认为自己是政协委员，有权对政府进行民主监督。“我是太天真太幼稚了”。
赵克罗是河南一家注册会计师行的负责人、所谓八个“民主党派”之一的民革成员，并以“新阶层人士”成为省政协常委。
《北京之春》杂志主编胡平在接受《新唐人》采访时表示，共产党的所谓“多党合作”，本来就是欺人之谈。
《北京之春》杂志主编胡平：“这些所谓的民主党本来就是附庸，一个花瓶的角色，但是，口头上中共领导人还是时不时要讲一讲，希望其他的民主党派也参政议政，但是，如果真的有民主党派把这件事情当起真的来了，那么对共产党来说，它又会不高兴，它就要去打压了。”
赵克罗在网络上质疑，“身为河南省政协常委，依中国政协章程进行政治协商，民主监督，参政议政，履行委员的权力和义务。身为中国注册会计师，从事社会审计监督，恪守独立、客观、公正执业道德底线。我何错之有？”
对此，网络作家吴建国认为，大多数所谓的“民主党派”人士，都是中共安插进去为中共服务的。当然也有少数异己人士，被中共拖进“民主党派”，而这些人士就很可能会打横炮，不按中共的规则出牌。
吴建国：“这个赵克罗现象的新奇点，就在于人类社会已经进入网络时代，中共的国家机器，已经很难控制网络媒体，但是，他这个政协常委，却反而要受到压制。说白了，你是做花瓶的，你应该遵守做花瓶的职责，不能跨越做花瓶的职责去指责政府的工作。”
近日，赵克罗又在微博上发了一条“遗书”，引起了网友的围观，被转发五万多次。赵克罗在遗书中说：“在我已经被拿掉河南省政协常委情况下，我已获悉，他们将对我继续打击报复，在河南省内层面上，我已无能为力，该来的就来吧！我等着，我已做好杀身成仁的准备！”
12月24号和25号，习近平走访了各民主党派中央和全国工商联，并进行了座谈，习近平强调，要坚持和发展多党合作。
时隔不到三天，12月27号，《河南日报》就在头版社评位置大批赵克罗。外界揣测，《河南日报》是有意还是疏忽，竟然在这个时候高调批评民主党派人士，这不明摆着，在和习近平对着干吗？
胡平：“媒体当然就是扮演打手，一方面共产党它们害怕的就是这种样子，因为表面上它不能不说那些客套话，就像它表面上必须得承认，中国的公民有这个权利，那个权利，但是你一旦拥有起来呢，就又要打击你，给你扣帽子，给你横加罪名。”
胡平建议，在这种情况下，我们应该对扮演打手的媒体，要痛加批评，鼓励更多的人站出来维护他们自己的权利。
采访编辑/常春 后制/王明宇
Henan Daily Confronting Xi Jin Ping?
On December 27, the official newspaper “Henan Daily”
published an article in a front page editorial,
in which it criticized Zhao Keluo who, against the provincial
government launched a “leveled tomb movement” online.
Zhao Keluo is member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
Henan Political Consultative Conference,
He is also a member of the Revolutionary Committee Of
the Chinese Kuomintang which is one of the eight so-called “democratic parties” in China.
Three days ago, the new CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping
stressed that the CCP should enhance multi-party cooperation.
Now that the Henan Daily has criticized Zhao Keluo heavily,
does it not confront Xi Jinping openly?
The Henan Daily published an article titled
“Treat Rationally, Assemble the Consensus”.
The article said Zhao Keluo had published
“improper words” online.
The article also questioned the CCP’s
“multi-party cooperation” in a political tone.
The article attacked an individual
which is rare in China’s local politics after 1989.
In May, Zhao Keluo used his real name and published
a microblog which challenged the movement that
the CCP’s Nanyang City government had leveled tombs.
He criticized that the local government had only leveled
tombs of ordinary families,
but didn’t touch the tombs of officers’ families
whose levels are higher than deputy director.
Zhao Keluo’s words have triggered a strong
public discussion
which criticizes the Henan authorities. In November,
the Leveled Tomb Movement has been forced to stop.
On December 17, Zhao Keluo published “A CCP Political
Consultative Conference Member’s Confession Letter”.
In the article, he said he “was removed from the candidates
list of the next Henan Political Consultative Conference”,
“because he had made trouble for the leadership
over the Nanyang leveled tomb movement case”.
He confessed he thought that he, as a member of
the Political Consultative Conference , should have the
right to do democratic supervision, but “ I was too naïve.”
Zhao Keluo is a director of a registered accounting firm,
and a member of the Revolutionary Committee Of
the Chinese Kuomintang which is one of the so-called eight “democratic parties”.
He entered the Political Consultative Conference
as a “new level personage”.
Hu Ping, the chief editor of “Beijing Spring" magazine
told NTD that CCP’s so-called “multi-party cooperation” is just deceptive talk.
Hu Ping: ”These so-called democratic parties are vassals.
They are acting as vassals, which means the CCP leaders
can say that democratic parties are welcome to be involved in politics,
but if the parties really do it,
the CCP will be unhappy and will suppress them.”
Zhao Keluo commented online, “As a member of
CCP Henan Political Consultative Conference,
I have the right and obligation to do political consultation,
democratic supervision,
and to be involved in policy discussion, all of which
are defined by articles of CPPCC association.
As a China registered accountant, I should be engaged
in social audit supervision, assist on independence,
objective and judicial practicing projects.
What have I done wrong?”
In this regard, Wu Jianguo, a network writer, thinks that
most of the so-called democratic parties’ members
are arranged by and working for the CCP.
Of course, a small number of them are dragged into
the “democratic“ parties,
in which position they can watch for actions or thinking that
doesn’t match the CCP’s policy, or for “wrong cards“ being played.
Wu Jianguo: “The interesting point of Zhao Keluo case
is that human society has entered the internet age,
it’s hard for the CCP’s state apparatus to control net media.
As a member of CPPCC, Zhao was suppressed.
It shows that Zhao is a vassal of the CCP,
he has to follow the game policy made by the CCP.
He can’t do anything that shouldn’t be done by a vassal.”
Recently, Zhao Keluo published a “suicide note" online,
which attracted the interest of netizens, and was forwarded more than 50,000 times.
Zhao Keluo said in the suicide note,
”After I had been removed from the membership of CPPCC,
I was told that they will monitor me continually.
On a provincial level, I have no solution to protect myself.
Let the retribution come!
I will wait, and I am prepared for death.”
On December 24 and 25, Xi Jinping visited the headquarters
of each of the democratic parties, and the National Federation of Industry and Commerce.
Xi stressed the importance of meetings that will
consist of and develop multi-party cooperation.
In a little less than three days, the Henan Daily published an
article on the front-page on December 27 criticizing Zhao Keluo.
The leading article discussed whether it was intentional or
negligence, that the Henan Daily had criticized a democratic person in high profile?
Does it look like a direct confrontation with Xi Jinping himself?
Hu Ping: “Of course, the media is a hired thug in China.
On the one hand, the CCP is afraid of this situation
because it has to speak politely on the surface.
This is like it admits that Chinese citizens have rights
but it will suppress those citizens all the same,
and will name you a criminal if you really
try to exercise those rights.“
Hu Ping suggests that in this situation, we should
criticize the media which has acted as a hired thug.
We should encourage more people to stand up
and protect their rights.
