【新唐人2012年11月29日讯】香港《争鸣》杂志11月号刊载文章披露，在中共十八大开幕之前，中央政治局就为选举制定了“得票率指标”。此外，在十八大会议期间，中央政治局否定了两项具有“民主”和“透明度”的建议。请看以下报导。
《争鸣》杂志证实，中共在十八大的选举为了表现出圆满，中央政治局为十八大选举的“得票率”制定了高系数指标。
首先，要保证中央委员的得票率全部超过百分之八十，保证候补中央委员的得票率超过百分之七十八。其次 ，保障中央政治局委员、中央书记处书记的得票率超百分之八十五，“中央政治局常委”的得票率在百分之九十以上。
同时，要保障中纪委书记、副书记、中央军委委员的得票率在百分之九十二以上。保障中央总书记、中央军委主席、中央军委副主席的得票率，超过百分之九十三。
另外，为了确保高额得票率指标，胡锦涛还下达了三个确保的指令。
杂志分析，实现这些“中国特色的高额得票率”指标，“彰显和谐稳定”是中共体制的共识。
美国哥伦比亚大学政治学博士王军涛表示，共产党选举制度，以及干部选拔的机制，都存在着问题。
王军涛：“现在的领导班子高度极权的干部，并不是在解决问题中产生他们的干部候选人，然后由人民来选举，而是由共产党的各个权贵集团，进行瓜分这些职务，以便自己能有更大的机会，去继续能够捞取利益，去祸害老百姓。”
时事评论员林子旭认为，中共的“十八大”投票是假的、鼓掌是假的、营造的所谓和谐气氛是假的。
时事评论员 林子旭：“开会的这些所谓代表，当然也都知道自己需要扮演什么样的角色，什么时候举手、什么时候鼓掌，那都是非常清楚的，这些所谓的代表，心甘情 愿的让别人把自己当工具使用。事实上，这些代表到不到北京，对于最后的人事安排，没有任何的影响。”
那么，中共为什么要开这样一个会议呢？
林子旭：“无非就是为了骗骗老百姓，装出一副自己也能在一定程度上，实践民主的样子，一个烂透了的党，还非要给自己装点门面，看起来是非常可笑、非常愚蠢的。但是，就是这样一场丑陋虚假的大戏。不知道又要耗费多少亿的民脂民膏。”
另外，杂志文章还说，有两项具有民主和透明度的建议被政治局否决，一个建议是，十八大代表选举产生中央委员、以及候补中央委员过程，建议全国电视直播，向全社会公开选举结果。
另一个建议则是﹕十八届的一中全会，由中央委员、和候补中央委员选出中央政治局委员、和中央政治局常委、以及中央总书记等，建议投票选举过程能邀请党内、和社会人士参与观察，然后向全社会公开选举结果。
文章指出，这两项具有初级“民主”及“透明度”的建议最后被否决，主要的理由是：“怕引发反效果，使中央工作产生困难”。而中央坚持选举得票情况不公开内情，主要怕“丢面子”、怕“失党心、民心”。
林子旭表示，十八大是中国社会最具有权势的一批人，集合在一起毫无羞耻感的公开骗人，这是中国大陆的现状。在大陆百姓对中共十分反感的今天，中共或许只能通过这种方式聊以自慰。林子旭强调，这一切，都是中共走向穷途末路的征兆。
采访编辑/常春 后制/黎安安
Hong Kong Media Exposes Facts behind the 18th National Congress Election
Hong Kong Cheng Ming Monthly’s November issue
disclosed that
the Communist Politburo had determined the percentage of
votes to win the election prior to the 18th National Congress.
The Politburo also rejected two pro-democracy and
pro-transparency suggestions during the National Congress. The following is our report.
Cheng Ming Monthly confirmed that to demonstrate
a satisfactory election,
the Communist Politburo developed indicators to ensure
the percentage of votes for the 18th National Congress.
First, the elected Central Committee must receive
more than 80% votes,
and the elected alternate member must receive
more than 78% votes.
Second, the elected Politburo Central Committee
and the Central Committee Secretary must receive votes over 85% and the Politburo Standing Committee over 90%.
Secretary and deputy Secretary of the Central Commission
for Discipline Inspection and the Central Military Commission must receive more than 92% of votes.
General Secretary of the Central Military Commission,
Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission must receive more than 93% of votes.
In order to ensure the high percentage of votes indicators,
Hu Jintao issued a “three guarantees" instruction.
The magazine analyzed that these Chinese characteristics,
high percentage of votes, harmony and stability, are the consensus in the communist regime.
Dr. Wang Juntao, who received his doctorate in Political
Science at Columbia University,
analyzes the problems that exist in the electoral system
of the Communist Party.
Dr. Wang Juntao: “The highly totalitarian central cadres
did not select their cadres candidates based on the problems to be solved, and then let the people do the election.
These positions become opportunities for the Communist
bigwigs groups to profit and continue to gain interest.
The public became the victims."
Political commentator Lin Zixu comments that everything,
including the votes, the applause, and the harmony, was fake.
Lin Zixu: “These so-called delegates definitely know
their roles. It is clear when to raise hands and applaud.
These so-called delegates are willing to become tools.
In fact, whether or not they show up in Beijing would not
have any effect on the final personnel arrangements."
So, why did the Communist regime proceed
with such a meeting?
Lin Zixu: “It is just to fool the people by putting on a show,
to a certain extent, of democracy.
It is a ridiculous and stupid show by a rotten Party.
However, billions of hard-earned dollars were wasted
for such an ugly false drama."
The article also mentioned two suggestions of pro-democracy
and pro-transparency were rejected by the Politburo.
One was a live broadcast of the election during
the 18th National Congress and to avow the election results.
Another suggestion was to invite participants from within
the Party and the community to observe the election
during the first plenary session after the
8th National Congress and avow the election results.
The article commented that the two pro-democracy
and pro-transparency suggestions were rejected for fear of negative effects and problems to the Central Committee.
The true issue behind the closed door election was that
the Central feared losing face and the support from the cadres and the people.
Lin Zixu indicates China is facing a shameless group
of powerful deceivers.
The Chinese have found the Communist regime
very objectionable.
Lin Zixu stresses these self-comforting tactics are signs
of a dead end for the Communist regime.
