【新唐人2012年11月28日讯】蒙古族干部杨晶，不仅在中共十八大上进入了由七人组成的中央书记处，实现了少数民族在书记处的“零突破”，他还将分管维稳工作。中共重用少数民族干部“维稳”少数民族，能有效吗？请看报导。
香港《信报》的消息，新当选书记处书记的蒙古族干部杨晶，将转任中共中央政法委副书记、维稳领导小组副组长、社会管理综合治理委员会副主任，协助孟建柱分管政法系统。
接近中共高层的消息人士向媒体透露，杨晶这次进入最高权力的执行机构，习近平时代解决少数民族问题手法，可能有所转变。
虽然，杨晶实现了少数民族在书记处的“零突破”，但十六大和十七大有少数民族政治局委员，十八大则没有少数民族的席位。
独立评论员李善鉴：“从他（杨晶）的经历来看的话，他并不能代表蒙古族或者中国少数民族的利益，他已经是完完全全的共产党教育、共产党驯化出来的一个人，所以，把他跟其他共产党官员比较不会有任何区别。”
独立评论员李善鉴还认为，杨晶是少数民族干部，由他主管少数民族“维稳”工作的可能也较大。不过李善鉴指出，在中共体制下，少数民族干部即使有权，能做的也很有限。这种安排，摆个花瓶给世界看的意味更大。
事实上，中共的少数民族政策一直不得人心。
11月25号和26号连续发生四起藏人自焚抗议事件，其中三人身亡，仅11月内，藏人自焚抗议者的人数就达到20多人。最近两年来，中国已经发生超过80起藏人自焚事件，其中60多人丧生，但中共当局始终否认打压藏族的宗教与文化政策，并坚称藏人拥有宗教自由。
不过，有两点让外界对习近平解决西藏问题抱有希望：一是他父亲习仲勋作为前副国务总理，负责西藏工作，在世时一直极力主张保障藏、回及其他少数民族的权益﹔二是习近平妻子彭丽媛是佛教徒，曾拜藏传师父。
也有消息人士透露，习近平在去年（2011年）参加“西藏解放60周年”活动中，曾私下对一些领导干部讲，在西藏的绝大部分干部“只懂得援藏，不懂得治藏”。
但李善鉴指出，从最近来看，政法委对待异议人士、对待藏人、法轮功等其他宗教信仰团体的打压没有放松，中共“稳定压倒一切”的思路并没有改变。中共未来能不能控制政法委无法无天的混乱局面，还要观察。
另外，国务院发改委主管的《改革内参》刊物曾有署名文章指出，“稳定压倒一切”可能“变成权力通吃的尚方宝剑”，“维稳”可能变成“积怨累恨”。
《信报》透露，中共十八大把“一人独大”的维稳局面，改为“三层分管”局面，也就是﹕由王岐山“领衔”、孟建柱具体负责、杨晶协管。改变了以往由“江亲信”担任政治局常委，同时兼任中央政法委书记、维稳小组组长、综治委主任的“一人话语权”时代。
时事评论员邢天行：“从三层分管上看，至少中共它的目地是想制衡政法委的权力，也就是说，对于以前江泽民、周永康留下来的政法委独大、第二中央的弊病，他们是看的非常清楚的，为了怕威胁到习近平这些领导人主要的位置，所以一定要把它分权。”
邢天行还指出，过去十几年中，政法委独大，给中国带来了深重灾难。中共目前连这种体制都不改变，只想通过适当的权力制衡，去改变已经彻底腐败的政法委乱政，也不改变“稳定压倒一切”的思维方式，那么，老百姓的权益根本不可能得到保障，期待中国法制的改善也无异于痴人说梦。
采访/陈汉 编辑/宋风 后制/王明宇
Mongolian Enters CCP Regime’s
Stability Preservation Leading Group
Mongolian Yang Jing was promoted to the 7-member
Secretariat of Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) at the 18th Party Congress.
Yang Jing became the first ethnic minority person
in history to hold a post in the Secretariat.
Reportedly, Yang Jing will be in charge of
stability preservation.
Will his promotion effectively help maintain
stability for ethnic minorities in China?
The Hong Kong Economic Journal reported on Mongolian
Yang Jing, member of Secretariat, CCP Central Committee.
Yang will take over as deputy chief of the Central Politics &
Law Commission(PLAC) of the Stability Preservation Leading Group,
and of social management, said the news report.
Sources close to CCP top-level told media that Yang Jing’s
entry into the ruling circle indicates a different way of handling minority issues under the reign of Xi Jinping.
Yang Jing became the first member of Secretariat of
the CCP Central Committee.
No ethnic minority Politburo member was produced at the
18th Party Congress, contrary to the two previous meetings.
Li Shanjian (Independent critic): “He (Yang Jing)
can’t represent the interests of the Mongolian or Chinese ethnic minorities.
His working experience shows that
he is reborn from CCP brainwashing completely.
So, there’s no difference between
he and other CCP officials."
Li Shanjian adds that as an ethnic minority cadre,
Yang Jing is likely to be in charge of “stability preservation”.
However, an ethnic minority official within the CCP system
is usually vested with limited authority.
Yang Jing’s role is more likely to be used as pretence,
Li Shanjian remarks.
In reality, the CCP’s minority policy has long been unpopular.
On November 25-26, four continuous Tibetan
self-immolations occurred in China,
with three of those taking part dying from their injuries.
In November, over 20 Tibetans set themselves
on fire to protest CCP rule.
In the last two years, China has seen over 80 Tibetan
self-immolations, causing over 60 deaths.
By contrast, the CCP authorities have consistently
denied their crackdown on Tibetan religion and culture.
The regime always asserts that
Tibetans in China possess religious freedom.
So far, two points have made the public hold out hope
for Xi Jinping to deal with Tibetan issue.
Firstly, Xi’s father Xi Zhongxun, former CCP deputy
premier in charge of Tibet, advocated to protect the interests of ethnic minorities;
Secondly, Xi Jinping’s wife, Peng Liyuan, is a Buddhist,
who is reported to worship a Tibetan master.
Informed sources have revealed Xi Jinping’s
covert comments.
In 2011, Xi Jinping attended an event held to celebrate
the 60th anniversary of the “liberation“ of Tibet.
Privately, Xi said to some leaders that the vast
majority of cadres in Tibet “only know how to aid construction in Tibet, but not how to govern it.”
Li Shanjian indicates that the PLAC’s crackdown
has continued on dissidents, the Tibetans,
Falun Gong practitioners and on other faith groups.
The Party’s policy of “stability overriding everything"
has never been changed.
The world still needs to wait and see whether
the CCP can get the PLAC’s lawlessness under control.
The in-house journal of the Development and Reform
Commission of the State Council published a commentary.
The article said that “stability overriding everything"
may be turned into “an imperial sword giving the bearer arbitrary powers”.
The “stability preservation" may finally evolve into piles of
grievances and discontent.
The Hong Kong Economic Journal said that CCP’s stability
preservation has changed from the past unipolar ruling to decentralization in three layers.
That is, Wang Qishan heads up stability preservation;
Meng Jianzhu is person in charge, Yang Jing, an assistant.
In the past, it was Jiang Zemin’s cronies who, as Politburo
Standing Committee members,
concurrently served as chiefs of the PLAC, of stability
preservation leading group and of social management.
Xing Tianxing (Critic): “Its decentralization aims to check
and balance the power of the PLAC.
That means, the new CCP top leadership knows very clearly
about the PLAC being set up as the 2nd Central Committee by Jiang Zemin and Zhou Yongkang.
So, fearing a threat to the power of Xi Jinping and
other top leaders, they now must decentralize PLAC power.”
Xing Tianxing adds that the PLAC’s hegemonic power
has brought grave disasters to the Chinese people over the past decade.
However, the CCP does not intend to remove the
rotten-to-the-core PLAC system, but only attempts to curb it with decentralization.
Nor does the regime want to change the ruling mindset of
“stability overriding everything”.
In this context, there is no way for Chinese citizens
to get their interests protected.
Nor is it possible that China’s legal system will see
any real improvement, says Xing Tianxing.
