【新唐人2012年11月15日讯】“中文大学”最近进行民意调查发现，港人承认自己是“中国人”的比率，创下97年回归后的新低，香港媒体解读，香港的“人心没有回归”。而中共喉舌《环球时报》13号指责这份民意调查：不严谨，不应该把“香港人”与“中国人”并列调查等，并且恐吓香港学者“远离政治喧嚣”。那么，“香港人”又如何看待中共媒体的说词呢﹖下面请跟本台记者一起去了解，听听“香港人”怎么说﹖
10月中旬，香港“中文大学传播与民意调查中心”，以电话的形式访问了819名港人，要求受访者回答：自己属于哪一类人，四项选择为“中国人”、“香港人”，和“香港人，但也是中国人”或“中国人，但也是香港人”。
调查发现，有42%的受访者选择自己是“香港人，但也是中国人”；承认自己是“中国人”的受访者只占12%，其中，“80后”的港人仅有2.4%选择自己是“中国人”，创下香港97年回归以来的最低点。
香港作家、自由撰稿人张成觉指出，这份调查是港人的真正民意。他说，大陆人都说来生不做中国人，而港人今生就有机会不做中国人。
香港作家张成觉：“本世纪已来，大陆经济发展，所造成的环境破坏危及子孙后代，这些景像已经令人怵目惊心。那么从政治上来说，好多问题，你比方说，对言论自由的扼杀，对异见人士的一种非法禁锢或者是虐待等等，所以这些暴政，在香港同胞里面肯定是引起很大的不满。”
今年6月初，湖南“民主斗士”李旺阳被虐杀后，超过2万5千名港人前往中联办，要求调查李旺阳的死因真相，还有人焚烧党旗，高喊打倒共产党，要求中共下台。
7月底，香港“民间反对国民教育科大联盟”发起了“反洗脑教育”大游行，有9万港人走上街头，要求中共彻回扼杀学生自由讨论的课程。
张成觉：“中国在政治上，经济上，以及在文化上或者道德上，各方面情况都使人觉得这不是一个现代文明社会应该有的，背离了全世界的发展潮流。大陆喜欢说与国际接轨，与时俱进，但实际上它种种做法都背道而驰，在这种情况下，香港同胞对中国人身份的认同，肯定是越来越持有一种抗拒的心里。”
香港“中文大学”的这份民意调查公布后，《明报》12号发表《港人国民认同感见新低，抗拒国旗国歌新高》的文章；而《晴报》则发表了《港人认同中国人身份创新低》的新闻，报导了“香港回归，人心没回归”这一现状。
13号，中共喉舌《环球时报》却以“香港某些调查少搞为好”的评论文章回应，狠批这份民调不严谨，不应将“香港人”与“中国人”并列调查，并指责香港媒体“断章取义、掐头去尾、生搬硬套”，令“假命题”成了“真新闻”等。
文章还警告恐吓香港学者不要再做类似民调，“远离政治喧嚣，少玩‘滴血认亲’的闹剧。”结尾还引用中共总书记胡锦涛在十八大上的报告，要求港人走“共享做中国人的尊严和荣耀”路线。
香港时政评论员程翔指出，中共与其这么紧张的批判香港人，倒不如自己检讨一下它的政策出了什么问题。
香港时政评论员程翔：“因为你看香港人对中联办经常干预香港，事无大小，从区会选举到立法会选举，到特首选举，每一级选举，中联办的手都伸得长长的，中联办的背影都在很多选民的背后，像这些，你中共的政策让大家觉得做中国人没有尊严，没有吸引力。”
程翔还指出，中共对香港“一国两制”的承诺从来没有兑现，自香港回归开始，就不断干预香港的运作，现在又出手打压、恐吓香港学术界。
今年的7月1号，香港主权移交15周年，有40万港人走上街头，抗议中共操控香港，破坏了“一国两制”及高度自治。
采访编辑/李韵 后制/葛雷
CCP Upset With Hong Kongers’ Non-Chinese Verdict
Recently, the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)
published the results of a poll on Hong Kong residents.
They show, the number of Hong Kong residents, regarding
themselves as “Chinese” has hit a record low since the Handover in 1997.
Hong Kong media noted, such results show the Handover
had not won the Hong Kong’s people sentiment.
However, the Chinese Communist Party’ (CCP) Global Times
published a critical to the poll article on November 13.
The article describes the poll as “imprecise”, claiming that
it should not make people choose between “Hong Konger” and “Chinese.”
It even intimidated the Hong Kong scholars
to “stay away from politics.”
How did the Hong Kong people responded
to this criticism from the CCP’s media? Let’s take a look.
CUHK’s Communication and Public Opinion Survey Center
interviewed 819 Hong Kong residents In Mid-October.
The interviewees were requested to answer the question
about which group they think they belong to.
The answer’ options were ‘Chinese,’ ‘Hong Konger,’
‘Hong Konger but Chinese as well,’ ‘Chinese but Hong Konger’ as well.’
The survey found that 42% answered
‘Hong Konger but Chinese as well.’
Only 12% of all the interviewees and 2.4% of post-80s born
regarded themselves as “Chinese” only,
which hit the historic low since the Handover in 1997.
Hong Kong freelancer Zhang Chengjue believes,
the poll has reflected Hong Kong’s real public opinion.
Zhang remarked that even many mainlanders said,
they wouldn’t be Chinese again in their next life;
it’s not surprising that Hong Kong people did the same
when they were given the chance to choose in this life.
Zhang Chengjue: ”Although China’s economy has
developed much in this century,
the resulting environmental disruption is horrifying
and has already threatened our future generations.
There are also numerous problems in the CCP’s politics,
such as suppression on freedom of speech and illegal arrests or torture of dissidents.
All these tyrannical acts have definitely led
to a lot of grudges among Hong Kong’s people.”
After the Hunan democrat Li Wangyang was murdered
this June, over 25,000 Hong Kong residents protested.
They gathered at the Liaison Office in Hong Kong, requesting
investigation of the truth behind Li Wangyang’s death.
During the gathering, some even burned the CCP’s flags,
and demanded the CCP steps down immediately.
In late July, Hong Kong’s “Alliance of Activists against the
National Education Program” organized a demonstration to protest the “brainwashing education program.”
Over 90,000 Hong Kong residents walked down the streets,
requesting CCP to cancel its planned courses aiming at suppressing the free minds of students.
Zhang Chengjue: ”CCP’s regime makes you feel none of its
characteristics is consistent with a modern civilization, either politically, economically, culturally or morally.
It just deviates from the global trends of development.
CCP uses terms like “geared to international standards,”
and “keeping up with the times” to describe itself.
Yet, in reality all its acts are just showing the opposite.
In this situation, the Hong Kong people will have more
mental resistance to identify themselves as Chinese.”
After CUHK announced the results of the survey,
the Ming Pao published an article on November 12.
It was titled, “Hong Kong’s sense of national identity hits
record low, while resistance to national anthem and flag reaches record high.”
The Sky Post also released news titled, “Hong Kong’s sense
of identity as Chinese drops to historic low.”
It reported that “the Handover did not win
the Hong Kong’s popular sentiment.”
On November 13th, CCP’s mouthpiece media Global Times
responded to the survey with a review article titled,
“Hong Kong had better cut down surveys of particular kind.”
The article described the poll as “imprecise,” and criticized
that it should not have made interviewees choose between “Hong Konger” and “Chinese.”
It also blamed Hong Kong media for their “garbling and
improper remarks” which convert a “false statement” into “real news.”
The article even warned Hong Kong scholars
with an intimidating tone to not do such surveys any more,
to “stay away from political clamor,” and to “stop
playing games of dropping blood for kinship test.”
In the end, the article cited the CCP’s general secretary
Hu Jintao’s words at the 18th National Congress, requiring Hong Kongers to “share their dignity and glory as Chinese.”
Hong Kong political commentator Cheng Xiang remarked,
rather than nervously criticizing Hong Kong,
the CCP should look inward to find out the problems
of its policies.
Cheng Xiang: ”You can see how the Liaison Office has often
intervened with Hong Kong’s internal affairs, small or big.
At each level of election, including the district council,
legislative council and executive chief,
the Liaison Office has extended its arms as much as possible
and cast shadow over many voters.
All these CCP’s policies have made us feel no respect
or attraction to recognizing ourselves as Chinese.”
Cheng Xiang further remarked that the CCP’s promise
of “One country, two systems” has never been kept.
Since the Handover, it has never stopped intervening
with the business of Hong Kong;
now it even publishes articles to intimidate
Hong Kong’s academic circles.
On the 15th anniversary of Hong Kong’s Handover this July 1,
400,000 Hong Kong residents joined the street protest against the CCP’s manipulation of Hong Kong affairs,
which violates the policy of “One country, two systems”
and infringes upon Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy.
