【新唐人2012年11月06日讯】中共副主席习近平预计在十八大之后出任中共总书记。日前，《新华社》公布了“七中全会”闭幕的消息，提到习近平主持修改党章。同一天，中共媒体发表文章，指称所谓“党建”（中国共产党的建设）将成为十八大的重要话题。因此，有分析认为，如何管理好中共自身，将是中共新晋“当家人”习近平上位后的第一要务。
《新华社》在11月4号傍晚发表的快讯说，在十七届七中全会上，习近平就《中国共产党章程（修正案）》讨论稿作了说明。但报导并没有透露党章修正案的细节。
当天，《中国新闻网》 发表题为“党建，十八大浓墨重彩之笔”的文章，指称官僚主义、形式主义、以权谋私、贪污腐败等党员干部的丑陋现象，都让中共的执政权力受到威胁。而薄熙来、刘志军等中外瞩目的案件，更暴露出制度监管的缺失。
因此，文章说，中共再次站到了历史关头，“党建”事关中共存亡的迫切问题，也必将成为十八大的重要话题。“党建”指的是所谓中国共产党的建设。
各大中共媒体纷纷转载了这篇报导，也掀起外界对习近平上位后的执政理念和首要任务的讨论。
《北京之春》杂志主编 胡平：“我不觉得他会有什么不同的做法，他会提一些新的口号，但是都大同小异，没有什么太大值得我们注意的方面。没看出他有什么进行大的改革的意思。”
《世界新闻网》报导，分析人士认为，作为拥有8000万党员执政党的新晋“当家人”，如何管好如此一个“庞大躯体”，无疑是习近平的第一要务。
报导说，登上中共“大位”前，习近平就是直管“党建”的“最高首长”，他主持的党校刊物曾抨击中共党内“潜规则”。据统计，最近半年来，习近平至少六次公开谈到中共“党建”工作，并强调要“保持和发展”所谓的“党的先进性和纯洁性”。
但中国当前的问题，是否能透过中共“党建”工作而有所改善或改变呢？
美国“哥伦比亚大学”政治学博士李天笑：“它只不过是通过所谓的改革来加强党的领导，使党的领导更有效率，这个实际上不但对老百姓没有好处，而且可能更加加剧这种专制的效率，共产党更有效的集中它的权力，党的执政能力更强，它对人民的压迫更加有效率。它主要意图是缓解外部老百姓对它的不满和对它的各种抗争。”
一位不愿透露姓名的中国社科院专家在接受《中央社》采访时说，中共的内部监督不可能发挥应有的效力，因为“一个人的左手，不可能管好右手”。
网络作家荆楚：“党的内部监督是国际笑话，那是让医生给自己开刀做手术嘛。其实很简单，不需要你管什么，你比如把新闻体制放开啊，把出关管制放松啊，把网路特务撤掉啊，这个民族的思想活力就发展起来了。不是需要他们做什么，而是需要他们不做什么。”
不过，美国“哥伦比亚大学”政治学博士李天笑指出，反过来讲，中共所谓的改革一旦启动，也可能会产生一种连中共都意想不到的“反”效应。
李天笑：“一方面（老百姓）会从各种形式破开封锁，现在海外的资源对老百姓已经起到很大作用了，很多人都翻墙出来看讲真相的媒体，像《新唐人》、《大纪元》这些﹔另外一方面，它这种压制一旦很严的话，老百姓觉得很难过下去的时候，老百姓就会组织起来进行抗暴，这个抗暴对中共来说就等于是要埋葬它。”
李天笑说，改革的“反”效应对中共来讲是可怕的，中共也可能因为改革而垮台。
采访/刘惠 编辑/王子琦 后制/王明宇
CCP Vice President Xi Jinping is set to become CCP’s
new Secretary General after the 18th Assembly.
Recently, Xinhua News Agency reported upon
the 7th Plenary Conference,
mentioning Xi Jinpings presidings over the revision of
CCP’s Party Charter.
The same day, CCP mouthpiece media published an article,
saying how the “party building" will be a central topic for the 18th Assembly.
Some analysts believe that it will be Xi’s first priority
to administer CCP itself after he takes power.
Nov. 4th, Xinhua News said in a newsletter,
how Xi Jinping briefed an amendment of CCP’s Charter
on 7th Plenary Conference.
However, the report does not disclose further details
of the revision.
The same day, China News website published an article titled,
“Party Building: Keyword of 18th Assembly.”
The article pointed out, CCP’s rule is shaken by
bureaucratism, formalism, abuse of power, and corruption amongst Party members.
The scandals about Bo Xilai and Liu Zhijun further expose
the true lack of supervision within CCP itself.
The article says CCP once again has come to an historical
moment.
“Party building" becomes a critical problem for CCP’s survival,
and will become a keyword of the 18th Assembly.
“Party building" refers to the development of CCP itself.
Major CCP mouthpiece media all reproduced this report,
triggering a discussion over Xi Jinping’s political philosophy and primary task.
Chief Editor of “Beijing Spring" Magazine: “I do not think
he will perform differently.
He might propose some new slogans, but largely the
same as before, unworthy of attention.
I do no see him planning to carry out any significant reform.”
According to “World News," analysts believe,
as new head of 80 million CCP members,
it will be Xi’s primary task to manage such a huge entity.
Reports say that Xi Jinping is already the highest official in
charge of Party building even before he becomes new president.
The CCP’s journals he oversees, have published articles
criticizing the" hidden rules" within CCP.
In the last half a year, Xi Jinping has on at least six occasions,
talked publicly about CCP’s Party building,
stressing the importance of “maintaining and developing
CCP’s advanced nature and purity.”
Will Party building solve the current problems of China?
Dr. Li Tianxiao, Columbia University: “Through these
so-called reforms, CCP only tries to strengthen its leadership with more efficiency.
This will in no way benefit the people, and will even
exacerbate the situation of CCP’s dictatorship.
CCP’s main purpose is solely to pacify public dissatisfaction
and anger against itself.”
An unnamed scholar from Chinese Academy of Social
Sciences said in an interview with the Central News Agency,
the CCP’s internal supervision will never be effective,
since “one’s left hand can not supervise his right hand.”
Internet writer Jing Chu: “Internal supervision within CCP is
only a joke, like a doctor doing surgical operations upon himself.
Actually CCP does not need to do much. As long as it revokes
censorship over news and publication, loosens customs deregulation,
and abandons its internet police, the Chinese nation will revive
its intellectual vigor once more.
It is not that they (CCP) should do anything,
but that they should stop doing what they are doing now.”
However, Li Tianxiao, doctor of political science from
Columbia University points out,
the CCP’s “reforms” might also produce a counter-effect,
which even CCP would find an unexpected surprise.
Li Tianxiao: “On the one hand, (people) will break open
information blockages in order to access overseas resources.
Many people are already doing so by visiting oversea’s media,
such as NTD and Epoch Times.
On the other hand, when CCP’s repression comes to an extreme
point and people feel it is difficult to continue on with their lives,
they will organize amongst themselves to resist any further
CCP’s violent rule, and aim to bury it.”
Li Tianxiao says, the “side-effects” of reform are more
formidable to CCP, since they could potentially bring an end to CCP.
