【新唐人2012年6月19日讯】大陆一年一度万人争过“独木桥”的高考刚结束，网路上流传几篇2012年各地高考的“0分作文”，文章充满了对社会现状的不屑、调侃和讽刺，有批评教育体制的；也有对城管、拆迁、官员贪污腐败、食品安全等社会不公平现象的反映。网民在称赞作者有思想、有文才的同时，也为作者抱不平，认为给他们得零分是中国选才制度的悲哀。现在让我们也来看一看这些“0分作文”。
2012年广东高考“0分作文”——处女的眷恋。作者在作文中针对社会时弊，把中国人从小学到大学被中共洗脑十几年，还有当局管控言论，封网，校车事故，红十字会及官员强奸幼女定性嫖宿幼女罪等一一罗列出来。
文中用对白的方式说，（中共）如此邪恶的，如果给我重新投胎的机会，我一定不会选这个地方。
文中还对中共官员把社会上的恶性事件全部推到“临时工”身上，并对民众进行“假、大、空”的宣扬进行讥讽调侃。
然而这篇作文却被打了零分。网民看了这篇“0分作文”后认为，作者知识丰富、涉猎广泛、紧追时事、笔锋幽默，文笔功底扎实，这么好的文章给零分是中国教育的悲哀。
大陆自由撰稿人、原《河北人民广播电台》编辑朱欣欣表示，学生能够勇敢真实的表达自己，难得可贵。
朱欣欣：“中国的教育完全是一种维护专制者统治的这么一个工具，完全不是在培养一个独立思考的这么一个人的教育。所以，它在极力回避针对现实的一些问题。”
网路作家荆楚表示，大陆的教育体系就是为了洗脑。
荆楚：“党国的教育是想方设法把孩子的脑子禁锢起来，用马克思、列宁那一套，站不住脚的那一套东西给孩子洗脑。你如果是不信那就要打零分，考试就过不了关。你必须按照它的框框来走，必须按照它的思维方式来思考，你才是一个好学生；第二个方面，它就是一个仇恨教育，就是党国几十年来灌输这个阶级斗争，灌输这个白刀子进去红刀子出来，灌输你死我活。”
看了“0分作文”，荆楚认为，整体上文章立意新颖，逻辑性强，语言组织严密，不失为好文章，但中式教育，只允许为党歌功颂德。
另外，广东省有一篇高考“0分作文”《如果生活可以选择我愿生活在……》，文中调侃，如果生活可以选择，我愿生活在新闻联播里。那里的领导个个都是时代先锋，群众人人都是道德模范。即使偶尔抓到一个贪官，也只是一笔带过，不留一丝遗憾。….那里的农业年年大丰收，工业月月传喜讯。即使遇到百年不遇的自然灾害和金融危机，都是有增无减…..那里的孩子都能上得起学，穷人们都能看得起病…那里是爱的家园，人间的天堂….
荆楚：“新闻联播全是假大空嘛，到全国人民生不如死，新闻联播里还是形式一片大好，不是小好，而是越来越好，整个新闻联播就是一个虚伪的冼脑，根本就没有新闻。”
朱欣欣指出，能写出0分作文的考生绝对能写出满分作文。而由各地考试院划拨的阅卷费，一份试卷得花好几块钱，阅卷老师也不被允许让那些用来影射社会现实的文章得高分。
采访编辑/李韵 后制/君卓
Brainy or idiot? Scoring 0% in the written college entrance
examination in China
The highly competitive annual college entrance examination
has just concluded.
On the internet are revealed several papers of the 2012 College
Entrance Exam in mainland China that were marked 0%.
The articles are full of disdain, ridicule and satire on
the social current status.
Some criticize the education system; some reflect on social
Inequities: house demolition, official corruption, food safety etc.
While netizens praise the authors’ ideology and literary talent,
they also feel disaffected for the authors.
They think scoring 0% in these writings is a sorrow of the
Chinese education system. Let’s take a look at these 0% writings.
One of the 0% papers of 2012 College Entrance Exam in
Guangdong is “The attachment of Virgins”.
Reflecting on the social ills, the author listed the social events
in the 10+ years of brainwashing by Chinese Communist Party (CCP) from primary school to college.
The article also included the authorities’ control of speech,
internet blockade, school bus accidents,
the Red Cross event and officials raping young girls,
which was characterized as prostituting young girls, etc.
In the article, the author wrote in the dialogue that the CCP is
so evil, if I were given another opportunity to be born again, I certainly would not choose this place.
The article also ridiculed that CCP officials blame all serious
social incidents on the “temporary workers”.
It also ridiculed CCP’s “false, big and empty” propagandas.
However, this writing was scored 0%.
After netizens read this writing, they said that
the author has a wealth of knowledge.
The article covers a wide range with hot pursuit of current
events, humor and a solid foundation of writing.
Such a good article was scored 0% and it is a sorrow of
the Chinese education system.
Zhu Xinxin, freelance writer in mainland China and former
editor of Hebei People’s Radio,
said that it is rare and valuable for the students
to express their true thoughts bravely.
Zhu Xinxin: “China’s education is a tool to maintain the rule
of dictators, absolutely not an education for bringing up persons with independent thinking.
Therefore, it tries its best to evade the issues in real society.”
Internet writer Jing Chu said that the education system in
mainland China is about brainwashing.
Jing Chu: “The education in the party-state is trying to lock up
the minds of children, using an untenable set of ideology from Marx and Lenin to brainwash the children.
If you do not believe it, you will be scored 0%
so you will not be able to pas the test.
You must go in accordance with the process, and
you must think in accordance with its requirements of thinking.
Only by doing so are you a good student.
A second aspect, it is an education of hatred, in which the
party-state has inculcated the class struggle for decades.
The CCP inculcated fighting and killing, with life and death.”
After reading the 0% writing, Jing Chu said that the article had
a novel subject, strong logic and well-organized language.
After all, it s a good article. But in the education of CCP,
it is only allowed to write praise for the CCP.
In addition, there is 0% mark for a paper from the College
Entrance Exam in Guangdong province, with title “If I can choose life, I would like to live in …”
The article ridiculed that if the student could choose their life,
they would live in the News Feeds of the CCP state sanctioned
media (CCTV) where the leaders there are all vanguards of the
times, and everyone of the masses is a moral model.
Even occasionally a corrupt official is caught, it is just a
passing, without leaving a trace of regret….
The agriculture there has very good harvest every year, and
the industry has good news every month.
Even in the face of natural disasters and financial crises,
there are only increases in the economy without reduction.
The children there are all able to go to school;
the poor also can afford medical treatment…
That place is a home of love and a paradise on earth…
Jing Chu: “the irony is that The News Feeds (of CCTV) are
all false, big and empty lies.
Even as the people in the whole country only just survive
there are still reports of excellence in the News Feeds.
It is not a small excellence, but an exaggerated excellence.
The entire News Feeds are a hypocritical brainwashing;
there is simply no real news.”
Zhu Xinxin pointed out that the candidates scoring 0% on thier
writing can absolutely write out articles with the full pictures.
There is a marking fee allocated by the exam institutions.
The teachers marking are not allowed to score highly
the articles which reflect the social realities.
