【新唐人2012年5月22日讯】近来，广东省委书记汪洋不断高调谈政改，引来外界关注。继“破除幸福是党赐予”的讲话之后，最近汪洋又提出要“让社会组织和公民充分自治”，再次为广东政改试验吹风。但有分析指出，虽然汪洋的主张有一些实质进步，但还没有触及宪政改革这个领域， 离真正意义上的“政改”还相差很远。
5月17号《南方日报》刊登了中共中央政治局委员、广东省委书记汪洋的一份调研报告。
汪洋在报告中指出，广东是“深化改革的排头兵”，但仍坚持社会主义市场经济的改革方向。汪洋特别提出要理顺政府与社会的关系，加快发展社会组织，把目前的大政府变成小政府。他认为，应该发挥社会组织和公民的自治作用，以增强社会的“自我修复”能力。
这也是汪洋继去年提出“凡是社会组织能够’接得住、管得好’的事，都要逐步交给他们”之后，进一步明确提出“让社会组织自治”。
对此，“山东大学”退休教授孙文广向《新唐人》表示，汪洋属于中共体制内的改革派人物，他关于市场经济改革的一些想法是比较好的。
孙文广：“现在在中共的领导下，政府是大政府，社会上的组织很稀少。这是不符合民主国家的状态的。有些事情应该让社会上一些组织去担当。”
时事评论员文昭也认为，汪洋的这一提法确实有实质性突破，但只是给出了一个模糊的方向。
文昭：“具体能够做到什么程度，要看两点。第一个是，他所说的收回政府权力，范围能有多大，哪些行政审批手续可以交给社会自己去办。还有就是，让社会组织自治是让哪些领域的社会组织可以自治。”
文昭同时指出，即使汪洋的主张能够暂时实现，目前也得不到制度性的保障，因为中共可以随时以任何理由再次取消这些自治。
文昭：“只有这个制度性解决了，根本制度性解决了，比方说：共产党的一党独裁结束了，司法独立了，然后社会媒体和新闻舆论，能够发挥它的舆论监督作用的时候，那么这样一个个具体的社会进步才能固化为一个成果，固化为不可逆转的成果。”
在此之前，汪洋曾经在5月9号的党代会上说：“我们必须破除人民幸福是党和政府恩赐的错误认识。”这一言论因为和大陆当局历来的宣传口径截然不同，而引起外界普遍关注。
中国民主大学校长唐伯桥：“汪洋也好，温家宝也好，胡锦涛也好，任何一个人，如果他们手上没有什么血债的话，如果没有做太多恶事的话，那么应该知道，（现在是）要跟中共这个邪恶的政权切割开的时候了。再不切割的话，他们会同归于尽的。”
与汪洋言论相呼应的是，国务院总理温家宝治下的民政部部长李立国在5月7号宣布，从去年（2011年）下半年，已经开始对各类社会组织进行直接登记。李立国同时强调，政治类、人权类的社会组织在登记管理上是平等的。
采访/刘惠 编辑/李谦 后制/柏妮
Wang Yang’s New Deal: Far from Constitutional Democracy
Wang Yang, Guangdong Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
Secretary has repeatedly mentioned political reform.
He has proposed “full self-governance of social
organizations and citizens."
This was after a speech on “Happiness is not given by CCP.”
However, analysis pointed out that Wang’s idea has little
relation with constitutional reform.
Wang’s idea is far away from constitutional democracy,
although what he claims can be seen as a real progress.
On May 17, “Nanfang Daily” published a survey report
by Wang Yang,
CCP Secretary of Guandong and member of the Politburo.
Wang Yang reported that Guangdong is a “vanguard
in deepening reform” based on the socialist market economy.
Wang mentioned the “small government” policy: To straighten
out the relationship between government and society.
To accelerate the development of social organization.
He also said way to enhance “self-healing” of society
by “self-governing of social organizations and citizens".
Wang Yang stated “self-governing of social organizations”
after he spoke about “the government should hand over
the handling of social organization businesses..
Sun Wenguang, retired Professor of Shandong University
said to NTD Television that Wang Yang belongs to reformists within the CCP.
His idea on market economy reform looks fine.
Sun Wenguang: “Under the leadership of the CCP,
the government becomes a big government.
Social organizations are scarce. However,
this situation is inconsistent with a democratic society.
The social organization should play a role in dealing
with social affairs.”
Commentator Wenzhao said that Wang Yang’s claims can
be seen as real progress, but did not show a clear direction.
Commentator Wenzhao: “How to convert what he said
into what he is going to do? There are two points.
The first is what kind of administrative approval procedures
can be canceled and let the social organizations self-control?
The second is what kind of social organizations
can be self-governing? ”
Wenzhao also mentioned that perhaps Wang’s target
can be achieved temporarily.
However, there is no institutional guarantee, so the CCP can
cancel “self-governance” at any time and with any reason.
Wenzhao: “Only with solving institutional issues, for example,
ending one-party CCP dictatorship, judicial independence,
or media really playing a supervisory role; then specific social
progress can be solidified as an outcome. An irreversible outcome.”
On May 9, Wang Yang made claims at the CCP Congress.
“We must get rid of misconceptions that people’s happiness
is a gift from CCP.”
Tang Boqiao, Rector of Chinese Democracy University said:
“Anyone, including Wang Yang, Wen Jiabao or Hu Jintao, if
they do not have blood on their hands, then they should know
that now is the time to cut away from the evil CCP regime.
Otherwise, they are going to perish together.”
Echoing Wang Yang, Li Liguo, Minister of Civil Affairs
in Wen Jiabao’s Cabinet spoke on this issue on May 7.
From the second half of 2011, they started direct
registration for certain kinds of social organizations.
Li Liguo emphasized at the same time that it is the same
registration process for political organizations and human rights organizations.
