【新唐人2012年5月16日讯】中共党报《人民日报》，极其罕见的整版刊登文章谈“政改”。外界分析，在目前中共政治敏感时机谈“政改”，显示胡温在这个问题上已经达成共识，而在温家宝和周永康的对决当中，温家宝占了上风。但是，针对“政改”议题，具体改什么?怎么改? 以人民的利益为重，还是仍以中共的利益为重? 分析说，老百姓正等着看胡温做什么，而不是说什么。
《人民日报》5月14号，在第五版，用整版刊登署名“郑志文”对这一议题展开的论述，并围绕六个方面论证中国政治体制改革。香港《东方日报》表示，作为具有风向标意义的《人民日报》以大篇幅文章讨论政改，显然不是无的放矢。报导说，《人民日报》论政改，是为十八大定调。
不过，在此之前，中共总理温家宝曾多次呼吁“政改”，不是被冷遇，就是遭到批评。
美国“乔治梅森大学”教授章天亮表示，在胡温当政期间，《人民日报》这样大量谈政改还是头一次，这表明温家宝和周永康的对决当中，温家宝占了上风。
美国“乔治梅森大学”教授章天亮：“因为实际上《人民日报》，它是在中宣部的控制下的，中宣部是在李长春的控制下，而李长春和周永康之间属于一个结盟的关系，他们都曾经被法轮功学员起诉过了，所以说，我想，在这个过程中，《人民日报》能登出来，他标志温家宝确实是在这个角力的过程中胜出了。”
《大纪元》新闻网14号也发表“温家宝战胜周永康”文章，指称，胡锦涛在一次会议上最终决定对周永康进行调查，并补充说，调查须要在“公正”但“不公开”的原则下进行。所有与会者都意识到胡、温现时对周永康的策略是“温水炖青蛙”。而在这个非常敏感的时机，《人民日报》呼应温家宝刊登整版“政改”的文章，显示胡、温在“政改”这个问题上已经达成共识。
而网路作家吴建国认为，在中国，政改到底能走多远？之前很多事情表明，一旦涉及党的利益，很多事情就被否决了。
网路作家吴建国：“六四镇压，也就是中共对80年代政改的彻底否决，六四后不仅政改被搁置了，而且还进一步剥夺了人民参政议政的权利，也就造成了之后镇压法轮功这样的特大冤案，以及中国社会面临的各种危机。”
因此，吴建国希望温家宝推行的政改，能够以人民的利益为重，而不要以中共的利益为重，这样才有真正的政改。
章天亮表示，现在中共谈的政改，并没有超出当年胡耀邦和赵紫阳所谈的范围，而那时的老百姓对政治体制改革，还是抱有很大的信心，但是现在不一样了，老百姓不但要看你说什么，还要看你做什么。章天亮说，民心不是靠空话就能赢得的。
章天亮：“比如说，废了中共，另立一个新党，开放结社，在中国实行向自由社会过渡，这些，我觉得都是作为胡、温来讲的话，是可以名垂青史的事情。那么我们也非常希望看到，这些双手沾满了鲜血，像周永康这样的人，他们能够被清洗，其实对于周永康能够被比如说免职，像薄熙来那样公开处理呀，对于胡、温来讲，他在党内可以立威，连周永康这样的狠角色，他们都能搞定的话，那么其他别人更不在话下了。”
吴建国也表示，血债派就是要维护现有的暴政，来保证他们不被清算，胡、温如果通过政改，比如尊重人民的参政、议政权或言论自由等方面的权利，一方面可以赢得人心，另一方面通过法律的手段可以清算血债派，吴建国认为，这是好的趋势。
采访撰稿/常春 后制/薛莉
How will Hu-Wen make “political reform”?
The state-run “People’s Daily” newspaper has published
a full-page article on “political reform”.
Analysts think it means that there is a Hu-Wen consensus
to discuss “political reform” at such a sensitive time.
Wen has also prevailed in a duel with Zhou Yongkang.
However, how will they make “political reform”?
Is it related to benefiting people or to benefit the CCP?
It is reported that Chinese people are waiting to see what
actions Hu and Wen take, rather than what they talk about.
On May 14, People’s Daily published an article by an author
named “Zheng Zhi Wen” in the fifth forum.
The article discussed six aspects of “political reform” in China.
Oriental Daily News in Hong Kong said it obviously has
a special meaning to discuss “political reform” with such a great length of article in “People’s Daily”.
Oriental Daily News thought this article raises a tone
for the coming 18th CCP National Congress.
Wen has called for “political reform” many times before,
but was met a cold shoulder and received a lot of criticism.
Zhang Tianliang, professor at George Mason University, US,
said that this is the first article which has discussed
“political reform” in depth since Hu and wen came to power.
It means Wen prevailed in the duel which Zhou Yongkang.
Zhang Tianliang: “In fact, People’s Daily is controlled
by the Central Propaganda Department.
The Central Propaganda Department is controlled
by Li Changchun.
Li and Zhou are in the same faction and they were sued
by Falun Gong practitioners before.
Therefore, I think the article in People’s Daily means
that Wen prevailed in the duel with Zhou Yongkang.”
On May 14, the Epoch Times also published an article
named “Wen defeated Zhou Yongkang”.
The article said Hu decided to investigate Zhou under
the “fair” but “not open” principle in a meeting.
All participants noticed that Hu and Wen dealt with
Zhou by the “stew a frog in slowly heated water” strategy.
In this very sensitive time, People’s Daily publishing
a full-page report on “political reform” echoes that Wen published a “political reform" article.
It means that there is a consensus between Hu and Wen
on this issue.
Wu Jianguo, an Internet commentator, asks how far can
political reform go in China?
A lot of things are rejected when it comes to CCP interests.
Wu Jianguo: “The June 4th event means a rejection of CCP
political reform in 1980s, and ever worse, people’s right
to participate in politics are deprived after that.
It results in the injustice in suppressing Falun Gong,
and other various crises in China.”
Wu Jianguo hopes that political reform by Wen will take
into account what benefit’s the people as much as possible,
rather than benefiting the CCP.
Then it will become real political reform.
Zhang Tianliang says the current discussion on political
reform is still within the range of what Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang talked about.
By that time, people had confidence in political reform.
However, everything is different now.
People would like to see what you are doing,
instead of what you are talking about.
Zhang Tianliang thought that public opinion
is now not relying on useless words.
Zhang Tianliang: “For example, they can revoke CCP
and establish a new party.
They should allow others to establish association freely.
All these will let them go down in the history.
We also hope that Zhou and the “bloody” group
will be punished.
In fact, if Zhou is removed from his duty, just like Bo Xilai,
then Hu and Wen can establish credibility within the CCP.
Because if they can deal with such a grizzly guy,
others are just like pieces of cake.”
Wu Jianguo said, the “bloody” group want to sustain tyranny
to prevent them from being revoked.
If Hu and Wen make political reforms and give people
the right to participate in politics and have freedom of speech,
then they can access public support and punish
the “bloody” group through legal means. It is a good trend, Wu said.
