【新唐人2012年3月14日讯】中共最高人民法院院长王胜俊在两会进行报告中，提到了“司法公正”，但是对于“司法独立”却只字未提。学者认为，如果司法是属于某一个部门或者是某一个政党团体的话，那么肯定没有公正可言，同时有司法腐败的根源在里面。
中共最高人民法院院长王胜俊在人大会议进行工作报告，报告中关于“公正司法”或“司法公正”出现了8次，在提到“独立审判”时出现1次“独立”，但没有提到“司法独立”。
报告一开始，王胜俊首先提到加强刑事审判工作，全力维护国家安全和社会稳定。
“东南大学”法学院教授张赞宁表示，“维稳至上”相对破坏法治社会，如果一个国家“稳定高于一切”，那就等于没有法律了。稳定比司法还要高，比宪法还要高，那就是专制社会，就是“人治大于法治”的社会。
“东南大学”法学院教授张赞宁：“不稳定的根本原因，主要就是司法不公，还有其他的不公，譬如行政上的不公、制度上的不公所造成的，正因为有不公才有冤假错案，才有维权人士的出现，所以政府才提出了维稳，他的维稳实际上是饮鸩止渴，他越要维稳越不稳，只有解决这些冤假错案，是司法公正的，我们的冤假错案才会减少。”
学者认为，中国的司法“行政化”，只要在这个党政之下，那么不管将来谁当了最高人民法院院长，只要体制不改变，还是一样没有办法“司法独立”。
北京宪政学者陈永苗：“司法的人事任免权在党政的手上，在上面的手上的话，他就没办法做到司法公正，就有很大司法腐败的原因在里面。”
“东南大学”法学院教授张赞宁：“我的看法就是司法必须独立，司法不独立，那么这个法律就是一个虚假的法律，如果我们的司法是属于某一个部门或者是某一个政党的团体的话，那么它肯定是没有公正可言的。”
陈永苗预测，如果司法不独立，明年的法院报告还是跟今年一样的形式，有可能更倾向于控制，更强调社会的维稳。
北京宪政学者陈永苗：“一旦没有司法独立的话，法官就没办法做到司法公正，那么他（王胜俊）既然在这个报告里面提到这个目标，一旦经过那个（党）机制的运转，它自然而然的会产生司法腐败，最终的原因，就是司法在他的党的领导之下，这个体制还是这样子。”
张赞宁表示，只有“司法独立”才是公正的基础，一个国家什么时候真正实行民主，真正实行一个民选的政府，一个人民信的过的政府，那么这个司法才能公正，社会才能够稳定。
———————–
Maintaining “Stability” Intensified; Judiciary Goes Backwards
Wang Shengjun is President of the Chinese Communist
Party’s (CCP) Supreme People’s Court.
He highlighted an aspect of “Justice” in a work report in the
Two Sessions (the CCP’s high-level internal meeting).
However, he didn’t say any word
about “judicial independence”.
Scholars believe that if administration of justice belongs
to a specific department or a party group, then there is no justice.
Meanwhile, the root of judicial corruption will still exist.
Supreme Court President, Wang Shengjun delivered the
annual report to the National People’s Congress (NPC).
The word “Justice” appeared eight times in his report.
He once mentioned “independent trial,”
but didn’t talk about “judicial independent”.
At the beginning of report, Wang talked about strengthening
the criminal trial. This is to maintain “state security” and “social stability”.
Zhang Zanning, Prof. of Southeast University School of Law,
said that “maintaining stability above all” is in fact undermining the law. It would mean that there is no law.
“Stability” is above the administration of justice and the
Constitution, that is an authoritarian regime; the “rule of man”.
Zhang Zanning (law Prof.): “The fundamental root
of “instability” is judicial injustice, and others injustice, such as administrative injustice and the injustice of the system.
That is the leading cause of fake and false charges and
the existence of activists.
That’s why maintaining “stability” was launched. Maintaining
“stability”, in fact, is like “drinking poison to quench thirst”.
The more action taken to strengthen the so-called “stability”,
the more instability is taking place.
Only way to solve fake and false charges is justice,
and in this case, the injustices will be reduced.”
Scholars commented that in China, judicatory has
administrative characteristics, and has a state-character.
No matter who is a top judge of the Supreme Court, without
reform, “judicial independence” will not be achieved.
Chen Yongmiao (Beijing constitutional scholar): “Judicial
personnel management is controlled by the CCP regime.
In their hands, there is no way to achieve judicial justice.
Because of this, judicial corruption exists.”
Zhang Zanning: “In my view, the judiciary must
be independent. Otherwise, it is fake.
If a judiciary belongs to a specific department or a party
group, then there is no justice at all.
Chen Yongmiao predicted that if the judiciary is not
independent, next years annual report will be the same.
It will be possible to have more strengthening of control,
and intensifying of maintaining social “stability”.
Chen Yongmiao (Beijing constitutional scholar): “Without
judicial independence, judges cannot apply justice.
Even he (Wang Shengjun) mentioned good intent in the
report, but once it is operated under the Party system, it naturally will create judicial corruption.
Under the Party’s leadership, this system will
remain unchanged.”
Zhang Zanning said that Judicial independence is the
foundation of justice.
For a country, when democracy is really implemented, and
people can truly elect their government, this government can be trusted by people.
The judicial system will allow justice,
and society will be stable.
