【新唐人2012年3月2日讯】各位观众朋友们好，欢迎收看本期的中国禁闻。
首先，我们来看看中共两会前广受关注的几位大陆敢言知识分子的情况。
3月1号，大陆网友在社交网络推特上发起征集签名活动，要求全国人大、政协委员们前往山东了解被中共当局长期监控的盲人律师陈光诚及他的家人状况，并公布调查结果。他们指出，目前限制陈光诚和他家人的自由，没有任何法律依据。
同时，有44位探访陈光诚的网友，再次前往山东临沂，据了解，他们刚下高速路就被三辆特警车、20多辆警车包围。
两会前被限制自由的还有藏族女作家唯色，她最近获得了荷兰2011年度“克劳斯亲王奖”。3月1号唯色在自己的博客上发布消息说，她被北京国保人员约谈，不允许到荷兰大使馆领奖，并要求她在三月期间不能出门。
因为中共箝制言论而遭受损失的还有大陆学者杜光，他的新书“回归民主–与吴邦国委员长商榷十三个大问题”，原定3月1号由香港“新世纪出版社”正式出版，但是，据知情人士透露，新书已被中央党校紧急叫停。香港各书店当天也没有到货。此前，杜光曾发表文章，揭露中共理论的本质。
另一位广泛引起关注的人物，是大陆法律学者张赞宁，他最近发表的《议请撤销“政法委”案》一文，赢得众多大陆网民的支持。张赞宁在文章中指出，政法委的设立，是典型的党政不分“以党代政”，也是中共执政能力低下的典型表现；是中国最大的违宪事件。如果政法委不予撤销，中国的法治社会将从何谈起？又有何理由和脸面对外宣称“中国是法治国家”。
—————
Hello everyone. Welcome to today’s China’s Forbidden News.
First, let’s go to the story of several outspoken intellectuals’
before the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Two Meetings.
On March 1, netizens launched a signature petition campaign
on Twitter.
It urged National Congress and the Political Consultation
Committee to visit blind lawyer Chen Guangcheng,
to investigate Chen and his family, whom have been
under house arrest in Shandong by the CCP.
In addition, they asked for the investigation results
to be publicized.
Netizens point out that restriction on Chen and his
family’s freedom has no legal basis.
Meanwhile, 44 netizens had gone to Shandong to visit Chen.
However, sources said that once they exited the highway,
three armed vehicles and 20 police cars surrounded them.
Tibetan writer Woeser had her freedom restricted.
Recently, she was awarded with the Holland 2011
Prince Claus Awards.
On March 1, Woeser wrote on her microblog, saying that
she was invited for a “talk” by National Security personnel.
They didn’t allow her to attend the award ceremony
at the Holland Embassy.
In addition, they asked her to stay at home for 3 months.
Another story is about scholar Du Guang, and the CCP
restrictions on his freedom of publication.
His new book “Getting Back to Democracy,” was planned
to be published by Hong Kong New Century Press.
However, sources said that Central Party School urgently
ordered publisher to stop.
The books haven’t been delivery on that day to
Hong Kong bookstores.
Du Guang has published articles in the past, exposing the
CCP’s evil nature.
Another wide spread article is written by scholar lawyer,
Zhang Zanning.
This article is entitled “Dismissal of Political and Judiciary
Committee (PJC) Case.”
Zhang wrote that setting up PJC means there is no separation
of Party and Politics, it is the party replacing the politics.
It indicates the typical lower ability of one party
dominating a country.
This is the biggest case of breaking the law in China.
Without removal of the PJC, how can we talk about
China’s lawful society?
By what reason do they claim that China
is a country ruled by law?
