【新唐人2012年1月4日讯】新的一年刚开始，中国总理温家宝就遭到中共中央机关刊物《求是》炮轰，有媒体指出，这是中共喉舌第四次不点名批评温家宝提中国“道德滑坡”政见。学者表示，温家宝挨批的背后，是18大前，各个派系争斗白热化的集中反映。
2012年元旦出版的中共党刊《求是》杂志，发表了所谓《正确认识我国社会现阶段道德状况》的署名文章。有媒体指出，这是继中共党报《光明日报》批评温家宝的“道德滑坡”论之后，中共媒体第四次炮轰温家宝。
2011年4月温家宝表示，近年来相继发生的“毒奶粉”、“瘦肉精”、“地沟油”、“染色馒头”等恶性食品安全事件，足以表明中国社会诚信缺失、道德滑坡已经到了何等严重的地步。
《求是》杂志同时刊登了胡锦涛在十七届六中全会上的部分讲话，指责西方加紧西化、分化中国。外界认为，杂志社有借胡打温的意思。
香港《苹果日报》指出，《求是》和《光明日报》是中宣部直接控制的报刊，两份报刊公然批评温家宝，既彰显胡温的政治歧见，又显示中共高层权斗的白热化。
“美国纽约城市大学”政治学教授夏明：“对温家宝的绞杀，从某种程度上来说，也是目前中国整个执政当局他的心理的直接封闭、逐渐反对普世价值的一个典型表现。这是中共政府目前在面对强大的普世价值的挑战下，他的一种退却、一种顽抗，同时一种封闭心态。”
夏明分析认为，以胡锦涛为代表的团派和以薄熙来为代表的新左派，他们都不想否定中国现状，他们觉得中国已经非常成功了，根本不用去考虑全球的普世价值来作为道德参考。而温家宝从改革派方向批评现存的一些政策，想把中国改革的主题提出来，所以他会受到胡锦涛和薄熙来一派的强大挑战。
不仅如此，在中国大陆，思想界也比较混乱。像毛左的《乌有之乡》网站发起评选“十大文化汉奸”活动。其中著名学者茅于轼、历史教师袁腾飞、党史专家李锐获得前三名，而白岩松、辛子陵等也都入围。
对此，夏明表示，中国思想界、知识界也在为不同的派系服务，他们因为利益的分化而出现尖锐的对立，他们本身代表着不同的政治阵营和利益集团。
夏明：“目前面对18大的权利交接班过程，各派在思想战线上展开了白热化的交锋。目前对温家宝的一些打压、思想上的围攻，从某种程度上来说，也是政治派系权利争斗的一部分。”
夏明最后指出，在道德层面，中共既反中国的传统又反西方的普世价值，是最为反动和落后的政权。
新唐人记者常春、宋风、孙宁采访报导。
CCP Internal Fighting Intensified, Wen Criticised in the New Year
At the beginning of the New Year, Chinese premier Wen Jiabao
was criticised by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s magazine, Qiushi.
Some media highlighted that this is the fourth time the CCP
media criticized his opinion on China’s moral degradation without mentioning Wen’s name.
Scholars said that criticising Wen reflects the intensified CCP
Internal fighting before 18th Congress.
On Jan.1, the CCP’s party media, Qiushi, published,
“Correct way of understanding the current moral situation.”
Some media pointed out that following the party’s media
Guangming Daily’s article,
this is the fourth time criticising Wen’s opinion regarding
China’s moral degradation.
On April 2011, Wen said that what happened recently
with the series of food safety incidents such as “tainted milk,”
“lean meat powder”, “drainage oil,” and “tainted steamed buns”
shows lack of integrity and serious moral decline in Chinese society.
Qiushi magazine published part of Hu Jintao’s
6th Plenary Session’s speech echoing this article,
accusing a western country of trying to westernize and divide China.
It is speculated that the articles intended to show Hu criticizing Wen.
Hong Kong Apple Daily reported that Qiushi
and Guangming Daily are controlled by the CCP central propaganda department.
Two media publicised articles about Wen Jiabao not only
highlights Hu and Wen’s differing political opinions, but also highlights the intensified internal struggle.
Political science professor, Xia Ming
at City University of New York, “Criticising Wen reflects
the CCP directly closed their mind and gradually went against
universal values.
This shows the CCP’s retreat, recalcitrance and closed mind
when facing the challenge of universal values.”
Xia Ming analysed that neither Hu Jintao’s nor Bo Xilai’s
groups want to devalue China’s current situation,
they think China has been very successful, and
never considered taking universal values as a moral reference.
However, Wen Jiabao criticised the current policies
from an angle of reform.
He wants to point out the major issue of the reform is
that he faces challenges from Wen and Bo’s groups.
Moreover, the intellectual field is also in chaos.
A leftist website devoted to voting for the “top 10 cultural spies,”
launched, scholar Mao Yushi, history teacher Yuan Tengfei,
party history expert Li Rui are selected as top 3,
and Bai Yansong and Xin Ziling have also been selected.
Xiao shared his opinion that China’s intellectuals serve
different party groups, they opposed each other for their own interests.
They represent different political groups and interests groups.
Xia Ming: “At present, facing the power shift process of
18th Congress, all the party groups’ fighting intensified. Pressuring Wen Jiabao is the part of it.”
Xia Ming concluded that if talking about morals,
China is against both their own traditional morals and universal values.
The CCP is a most reactionary and backward regime.
NTD reporters Chang Chun, Song Feng and Sun Ning
