【新唐人2011年10月22日讯】被中共形容为“特立独行”的利比亚独裁狂人卡扎菲毙命在一个下水道里。消息传出，整个世界为之沸腾。狂喜的不仅是利比亚人民，追求民主自由的民众都在欢庆。与之相反的是，同样是独裁政权的中共政府，对卡扎菲的死，却表现冷淡，在喉舌媒体上大做反调文章。
10月20号，卡扎菲的生命在苏尔特终结，标志着他42年的利比亚独裁统治的土崩瓦解。消息传出后，的黎波里街头士兵们向天空鸣枪表示庆祝，居民们欢欣鼓舞，持续了8个月的利比亚战争终于结束。
世界各国领导人纷纷谴责卡扎菲的生前的暴行，庆贺利比亚结束暴政。美国总统奥巴马表示，卡扎菲之死将翻开新篇章﹔欧盟执行委员会主席巴罗佐认为，这代表了利比亚专制时代的终结。此外，联合国秘书长潘基文、德国外长威斯特威勒、法国外长阿兰．朱佩、英国首相卡梅伦等都明确表达了对利比亚结束暴政的喜悦。
中共当局的反应又是如何呢？
中共外交部发言人姜瑜21号在回应卡扎菲身亡的消息时声称:中方注意到有关报导，中方希望利比亚尽快开启包容性政治过渡进程。姜瑜没有评论卡扎菲的死。当然，我们目前也没有看到中共领导人的任何回应。
中共喉舌媒体又是如何报导卡扎菲之死的呢？
卡扎菲死亡的重磅消息，《新华网》、《人民网》都摆在显要位置，不过，在《卡扎菲之死，谁最受益？》的文章中， 《新华网》评论说，卡扎菲曾多次誓言要当一名“烈士”，现在他在战场上被打死，而不会像萨达姆那样遭受种种羞辱，因此是个不算最坏的结局。
而这篇《卡扎菲之死对利比亚局势的影响》写道:对利比亚执政当局和国际社会来说，卡扎菲身亡并不意味着利比亚未来将是一片玫瑰色，相反，种种挑战已经摆在有关各方。
《人民日报》的《利比亚彻底翻过“卡扎菲时代”一页》的报导的副标题是:“过渡委”声称进入建设时期，有舆论认为各派别之争将加剧。
此外，中国社会科学院西亚非洲所研究员、中国中东学会副秘书长殷罡也提出，“军阀混战”不是没有可能发生的。
时事评论员陈志飞认为，中共当局散布利比亚会造成国家内乱的言论，是在混淆视听。
陈志飞：“因为现在的利比亚的过渡政府已经宣布，随着卡扎菲离开历史舞台，整个的民主这个过程啊，正式启动，在八个月内就要举行大选，而且利比亚现在国家的整个的形式趋于稳定，所以说可以证明，在大多数人民都喜欢民主的前提下，这也是一个最基本的人权的这个前提下，这个民主的过程应该是有序的，而且是符合大家利益的，而且也是会在很短时间内就会得到解决。”
我们再看《新华网》的《陈虎点兵:藏在利比亚战争背后的“触角”》这篇文章，第一个小标题就是:西方急着在利比亚“坐地分赃”。文章提出，从意识形态来说，西方没有更多的参与这场战争的理由。作者表示，西方参加这场战争的一个巨大动因是经济利益，还声称看到“一个赤裸裸的经济利益分配的过程”。
陈志飞：“但是我们看到，美国这个石油进口的这个数据的话，对美国石油进口最大的国家呢，其实不是中东国家，而是加拿大，占到了百分之五十左右，第二名是沙特阿拉伯，但第三名跟沙特阿拉伯的这个进口量基本相当，是墨西哥，那么按照一些网上非常热闹的这些讨论的这种结论来说的话，那么美国如果是入侵加拿大，或者入侵墨西哥岂不是比入侵伊拉克或者是利比亚，对解决自己的石油问题来的更容易一些吗。”
陈志飞指出，西方对利比亚反抗军的援助，实际上是基于西方文明社会的理念和对利比亚人民的爱护，希望对他们的自由民主运动做一些帮助。
新唐人记者李静、李若琳综合报导。
CCP Sings An Opposite Tune On Gaddafi’s Death
Libyan dictator Gaddafi came to his end finally and
celebrations everywhere in Libya.
The news inspired the world and rejoices spread over not only
the Libyan people but all who are striving for democracy and freedom.
In contrast, the CCP authorities, a similar regime to Gaddafi
dictatorship, responded coldly to his death.
Instead, the CCP made a big fuss in its mouthpiece media
with articles singing an opposite tune.
Gaddafi’s life ended on October 20th in the Libyan city of Sirte,
marking the collapse of his 42-year dictatorship.
The news was followed by Libyan celebrations.
On the streets of Tripoli, soldiers fired shots into the sky,
and residents rejoiced.
Eight-months of war ended at last.
World leaders condemned the atrocities committed by Gaddafi
during his lifetime and celebrated the end of tyranny in Libya.
U.S. President Barack Obama said that Gaddafi’s death is
opening a new chapter.
European Commission President Jose Barroso believes that
this represents the end of Libya’s authoritarian era.
Moreover, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, German
Foreign Minister West Wheeler, French Foreign Minister Alain
Juppe and British Prime Minister Cameron, among others,
expressed clearly their joy of the end of a tyrannical regime in Libya.
What is the response of the CCP authorities?
On October 21st, CCP Foreign Ministry spokeswoman
Jiang Yu, in response to the news of Gaddafi’s death,
claimed that China has noted the relevant reports, hoping
Libya would rapidly embark on an inclusive political process.
Jiang Yu did not comment Gaddafi’s death.
So far, no CCP leaders have made public comments.
How did the CCP mouthpiece media report Gaddafi’s death?
News about Gaddafi’s death were placed prominently
on both Xinhuanet.com and People.com.cn.
However, an article entitled “Gaddafi’s Death, Who Is
the Most Beneficial?" published on Xinhuanet.com,
commented that Gaddafi had repeatedly vowed to
be a “martyr."
Now he is dead on the battlefield, but unlike Saddam,
who suffered all kinds of humiliation, this was not the worst end for Gaddafi.
An article entitled, “The Impact of Gaddafi’s Death on the
Libyan Situation" stated, “For the ruling authorities of Libya and
the international community, Gaddafi’s death does not mean a
rosy future for Libya.
On the contrary, various challenges have
been posed among parties concerned. ”
People’s Daily published an article entitled “Libya Completely
Turned Over Gaddafi Era" with a subheading of
“Transitional Committee claims to enter into the construction
period; the public believes factional struggles will intensify.”
What’s more, Yin Gang, a researcher at The Institute of West
Asian and African Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social
Sciences and Secretary General at the Chinese Association of
Middle East Studies proposed that it is possible for tangled warfare to break out among warlords in Libya.
Commentator Chen Zhifei believes that the CCP authorities’
remarks claiming possible civil strife in Libya is misleading to the public.
Chen Zhifei: “Since Libya’s transitional government
has announced, with Gaddafi’s death, the whole democratic process has officially been initiated.
A general election will be held within eight months.
Now, the entire country is becoming stabilized.
That proves that with the majority welcoming democracy,
and in terms of basic human rights,
such a democratic process is proceeding orderly and is
in line with the interests of the Libyan people.
In a very short time, the problem will be solved.”
Let’s look at an article on Xinhuanet entitled,
“Chen Hu’s Review: Antennae Hidden Behind Libyan War".
The first subheading is: “The West Rushed to
Divide the Booty in Libya”.
The article said that in terms of ideology, the West has no
justifications to join the war.
The author claims that a huge motivation behind the West’s
involvement in the Libyan war is economic interests, displaying
“a naked allocation process of economic interest."
Chen Zhifei: “But what we have seen is that based on the
U.S. oil imports data, its largest export partner is not a Middle
Eastern country, but is Canada, which accounted for 50% of
the total import value of the U.S.
The second is Saudi Arabia, the third is Mexico.
So according to some online discussions’ conclusions,
shouldn’t the U.S. be more inclined to invade Canada or
Mexico, instead of Iraq or Libya, to resolve its oil problems?”
Chen Zhifei pointed out that the West’s aid to the Libyan rebels
is based on the concept of Western civilization and out of care for Libyan people.
By providing aid, the West hopes to give some help to promote
movements for freedom and democracy.
NTD reporters Li Jing and Li Ruilin
