【新唐人2011年10月17日讯】9月中旬在美国发起的“占领华尔街”运动，很快蔓延全世界。目前日本、德国、韩国、台湾和香港等地，近900多个城市响应“占领全球”，连中国大陆也低调进行。有网友在脸书上发起“占领北京”活动，可惜立即成了“敏感词”。
随着全球的“占领风潮”，有大陆网友在脸书上号召“占领北京”，令当局神经紧张。正值中共第十七届六中全会，北京警方果不其然在有北京华尔街之称的金融大街上，增加警力部署。
不仅如此，目前新浪微博和百度贴吧已经封锁“占领北京”的关键字，在百度贴吧上，甚至连“占领华尔街”都搜寻不到。
更早之前，左派网站“乌有之乡”公布照片显示，6号下午已有数百名河南郑州市民聚集，高举白布条支持美国人民的华尔街革命。
当天集会有不少年长者，他们手臂上也绑上红布条写着支持占领华尔街运动，现场还有人散发传单。
《法国国际广播电台》报导进一步指出，中共媒体如新华社，报导不少美国发生的占领华尔街运动；但是像郑州集会声援的消息，大陆主要媒体几乎没有报导，响应占领华尔街运动的贴文，在大陆知名入口网站百度的讨论区中也找不到。
那么这场扩散至全球的“占领”抗议势头会不会在中国大陆蔓延？这场运动未来的走向又是如何？
美国著名人权活动家，“中国人权”前任主席刘青表示，民主国家发起的占领行动，与专制国家有着本质上的不同。
前“中国人权”主席刘青：“这种不满意和中国民众的不满意是完全不一样的，中国民众的不满意，你可以很好的听到，大家喊‘中共是法西斯’，是‘专制独裁’，是对这个政权彻底的否认，是对这个制度的彻底的否认， 而美国呢并不是对这个制度的否认，而是对某个问题提出来旨在寻求解决了。所以这是根本性质的不同。”
刘青进一步分析，像欧美这些民主国家，尽管民众会发生各种抗议活动表达对社会的不满，但是他们都可以利用宪政的框架，使这些问题能够在议会或最高司法机构解决。
前“中国人权”主席刘青：“ 民主国家就像一个钟摆一样，它不断的摆过来摆过去，它在寻求一种合理的、合适的、大家伙能接受的这种分配方式，还有这种权利方式。而专制国家呢，它唯一做的就是压制和迫害百姓。 ”
中国宪政学者陈永苗对《德国之声》表示，中共政府尽管在宣传上，以调侃的方式评论这些运动，其实它们内心应该是大为紧张，不排除中国等专制国家已经做好强硬的应对准备。
“占领北京”能不能实现，恐怕将几经波折。
新唐人记者常春、林慧心、周天采访报导。
‘Occupy Beijing’ Vs ’Occupy Wall Street’,
Launched in mid-September in the U.S., a campaign of
‘Occupy Wall Street’ swiftly spreads all over the world.
So far, nearly 900 cities in Japan, Germany, Korea,
Taiwan and Hong Kong, among other regions,
have responded. Even mainland China got involved
in low profile. Chinese netizens launched on Facebook
an activity of ‘Occupy Beijing,’ but the words immediately
became sensitive words online.
With the global wave of ‘Occupy,’ Chinese netizens
called on to ’Occupy Beijing’ on Facebook,
making the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
authorities nervous.
This comes amid the period of the Sixth Plenary Session
of 17th CCP Central Committee.
At Beijing’s Financial Street, its own Wall Street,
police presence noticeably increased.
The term ‘Occupy Beijing’ has been blocked on
Sina microblog and Baidu Post Bar.
In the latter, even ’Occupy Wall Street’
cannot be searched.
Back to the earlier photos published on Wyzxsx.com,
a left-wing website, shows that on October 6,
hundreds of citizens in Zhengzhou, Henan province,
gathered holding white cloth strips
to support the Wall Street revolution in the U.S.
Many elderly locals attended the assembly,
their arms tied with red cloth strips,
which had “Supporting the Wall Street Revolution”
written on them. Leaflets were distributed at the site.
Radio France Internationale reported of CCP official media,
such as Xinhua News Agency, publishing many reports
about the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ campaign in the U.S.
But in mainland major media there is almost no coverage
of the mass assembly in Zhengzhou.
On Baidu, China’s renowned portal website,
one cannot find posts in response
to the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ movement.
Is it possible for the global wave of ‘Occupy’ to spread
to mainland China? What is the future of the movement?
Liu Qing, a renowned U.S.-based rights activist,
and ex-president of ‘Human Rights in China,’
thinks that the ‘Occupy’ campaign in a democratic country
is fundamentally different from that in an authoritarian state.
Liu Qing (Ex-President, ‘Human Rights in China’) :
“This dissatisfaction is completely different
from that of the Chinese civilians. You clearly hear the
Chinese speak out “CCP is fascist," and “dictatorship."
They are negating the current regime,
a complete rejection of CCP as an institution.
But in the U.S., civilians are not negating the institution,
but asking for a solution to the concrete problems.
So they have fundamentally different nature.”
Liu analyzed that in democratic countries in Europe and
America, although the masses initiate all kinds of protests
to express their dissatisfaction with the government,
they can have these problems resolved,
through constitutional means, in the Parliament
or by the highest judicial authorities.
Liu Qing: “Democracy is like a pendulum. It keep swinging
until reaches a reasonable solution for the civilians,
including their rights. But what an authoritarian state does
is to control, suppress and persecute civilians."
Chinese constitutional scholar Chen Miao, told Voice of
Germany that although the CCP authorities’ propaganda
seemingly commented on these movements in a quipped
way, it in fact should have much inner tension.
It can’t be ruled out that the CCP regime, along with other
authoritarian states, are readily prepared for tough response.
As to the ’Occupy Beijing,’ movement,
it will probably go through several twists and turns.
NTD reporters Chang Chun, Lin Huixin and Zhou Tian
